RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 30 August 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070006061
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Bernard P. Ingold | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Thomas M. Ray | |Member |
| |Mr. Gerald J. Purcell | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a
general discharge under honorable conditions.
2. The applicant states that he was born in Mexico and came to the United
States to better himself. He met his wife at a young age. They had four
young children. He got his citizenship papers, and that is when he decided
to join the Army. It was very hard for him and his wife being away from
each other. At the time, he made a very bad decision by not returning to
his unit. Shortly after returning he was discharged for being absent
without leave (AWOL), not realizing at the time how it would affect his
future. He has been an outstanding citizen for the past 65 years.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the
Armed Forces of the United States); the results of an El Centro, CA, Police
Department records check; two letters of support, one from his pastor,
dated 9 February 2007 and on from his wife, dated 12 December 2006; a
basic training completion certificate; and a basic airborne course
completion certificate.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an
applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations
if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided
in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is
granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are
insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there
were sufficient documents (consisting of the documents provided by the
applicant) for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this
case.
3. The applicant was born on 26 January 1928. He enlisted in the Regular
Army on 3 February 1953. He was discharged with an undesirable discharge
on 26 November 1954 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368.
His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 1 day of service
for pay purposes and had 266 days of lost time.
4. Army Regulation 615-368 governed the separation of enlisted personnel
for unfitness. In pertinent part, it provided for the discharge of an
individual who was unfit for further military service because of habits or
traits of character manifested by antisocial or amoral trends, chronic
alcoholism, criminalism, drug addiction, pathological lying, homosexuality,
sexual perversion or misconduct; unclean habits including repeated venereal
infections; repeatedly committing petty offenses not warranting trial by
court-martial; habitual shirking; possessing an antisocial personality
disorder or defect; or a record of service revealing frequent disciplinary
actions because of infractions of regulations and commission of offenses.
5. Army Regulation 635-200 is the current regulation that sets forth the
basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7b
provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under
honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose
military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant
an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions
may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation
specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the
applicant’s discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and
regulations applicable at the time. The applicant acknowledges that he
went AWOL and his DD Form 214 shows he had 266 days of lost time.
2. The applicant’s good post-service conduct is admirable; regrettably,
however, that factor does not warrant granting the relief requested.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__bpi___ __tmr___ __gjp___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
__Bernard P. Ingold___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070006061 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20070830 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |UD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |19541126 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 615-368 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |A50.00 |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Ms. Mitrano |
|ISSUES 1. |110.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004115 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The records available to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records were provided in part by the applicant and from reconstructed records. On 14 August 1953, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004187
The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Based on his available record, his service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006502
The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. However, his WD AGO Form 53-59 shows he was discharged on 4 May 1949 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men Discharge Unfitness (Undesirable Habits and Traits of Character)) in the rank of private. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to upgrade his discharge to either an honorable or a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001288
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 9 February 1956 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men - Discharge - Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) with an undesirable discharge. The applicant's contention that his discharge should be upgraded and the evidence he provided as well as his available service record, including his service in Germany, was carefully considered.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009796
On 11 August 1949, the applicant appeared before a board of officers to determine if he should be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 for unfitness, repeated contraction of a venereal disease. His WD AGO Form 53-59 shows he was discharged from active duty on 3 November 1949, under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368, by reason of unfitness - unclean habits including repeated venereal disease with an undesirable discharge. On 13 June 1956, he was discharged from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059335C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008313C070205
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 9 December 1954; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066548C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He recommended that the applicant be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066954C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 14 June 1949 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002085638C070215
The regulation states that an individual separated under this regulation will be furnished an honorable or general discharge. The Board considered the applicant's request to change his discharge to Army Regulation 615-365 or Army Regulation 615-360. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reason and authority for separation issued to him was in error or unjust.