Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005961
Original file (20070005961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  18 October 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070005961 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Antoinette Farley

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Shirley L. Powell

Chairperson

Mr. James E. Anderholm

Member

Mr. Joe R. Schroeder

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military occupational specialty (MOS) shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 11 November 1974.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that MOS 64C20 (Light Vehicle Driver) as shown on his DD Form 214 should be changed to MOS 64C40 or 64C40 Heavy Vehicle Driver.  The applicant continues that his DD Form 214 is in error and denies him an accurate record to apply for work prior to and after discharge from prison.  

3.  The applicant provides in support of his case a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in support of this case. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's service records are incomplete; however, his available records show that he entered active duty on 19 November 1971 and was awarded the MOS 64C20 (Light Vehicle Driver) on 31 March 1972. 

3.  The applicant's records also show that while he was stationed in Germany he was further assigned as a Light Vehicle Driver during the period 28 April 1972 through 30 October 1972 and as a Heavy Vehicle Driver during the period
31 October 1972 through 8 November 1974.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 11 November 1974 in primary MOS 71N20 (Movements Specialist) and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group to complete his remaining service obligation.  
5.  Item 16a (Primary Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry 71N20, 73-05-31, Movements Specialist, and item 17a (Secondary Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry 64C20, 72-03-31, Light Vehicle Driver.

6.  Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows an initial MOS entry of 64C20 on 31 March 1972.  Item 22 also shows he was awarded primary MOS 71H20 (Movements Specialist) on 17 May 1973.  There are no orders in the applicant's record which show he was awarded MOS 64C (Heavy Vehicle Driver).

7.  Item 27 (Military Education) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant completed a 5-week Light Vehicle Driver course, MOS Code 64C2O, in 1972; and a 3-week Driver Training Course, MOS Code 64C3O, in 1972. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  In pertinent part, it directs that the primary MOS code number and title will be entered on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his MOS as 64C3O (Heavy Vehicle Driver). 

2.  The applicant's record shows he performed the principal duties of a Light Vehicle Driver and a Heavy Vehicle Driver while stationed in Germany.  However, his record shows he was only credited with the completion of MOS 63C2O (Light Vehicle Driver) in 1972.  The applicant's records show he was awarded a new primary MOS of 71N2O (Movements Specialist) in 1973 and made his previous MOS 63C2O (Light Vehicle Driver) his secondary MOS.

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 directs that the MOS held at the time of separation is to be recorded on the DD Form 214.  




4.  Evidence of record shows that at the time of the applicant's separation, he held MOS 71N2O (Movements Specialist).  Therefore his DD Form 214 is correct as currently constituted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_JRS____  __JEA___  __SLP __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__Shirley L. Powell_
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070005961
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085487C070212

    Original file (2003085487C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010699

    Original file (20090010699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded primary MOS (PMOS) 63C2O (General Vehicle Repairman) on 4 December 1970 and MOS 63B2O became his secondary MOS. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant's PMOS upon separation was 63C as awarded through the publication of permanent military orders. Since only the PMOS is authorized for entry on the DD Form 214, his DD Form 214 correctly shows 63C as his PMOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006354

    Original file (20090006354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 71N2O (Transportation Movements Control Specialist). This order also shows the applicant's primary MOS as 71N2O. Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant's primary MOS as 71N2O.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020548

    Original file (20110020548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Special Orders Number 70, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor School, Fort Knox, KY, dated 5 April 1969 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 16 December 2004 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006750

    Original file (20120006750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending on 18 February 1972 shows: a. he had reenlisted on 20 February 1969 for 3 years; b. he had attained the rank of specialist five, E5; c. his specialty number and title at the time of REFRAD was 44C2O (Welder); d. he did not have any insurance in force. The applicant contends that his DD Forms 214 do not complement each other and they fail to show his correct: * dates of service * MOSs * period of service in the FRG * promotion status *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000027

    Original file (20110000027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His primary MOS was 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic) and because he qualified as an expert with his M-16 Rifle, he was assigned duties as an M-60 Machinegun gunner on an M113 (Armored Personnel Carrier); however, he was never awarded MOS 11B and his records should show this MOS. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry and warrant officers and enlisted personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021445

    Original file (20100021445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available record and he has not provided any to show he held an infantry MOS at any time during his military career. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000631

    Original file (20120000631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 March 1974 to show award of the Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Badge for length of service as a member of EOD teams. Senior EOD Badge is awarded to any commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier if they have: (1) Been awarded the basic EOD Badge. The evidence of record indicates the applicant: * completed the required training and he was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005381

    Original file (20090005381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) dated 7 April 1977 to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B4O instead of 11B2O. For an enlisted Soldier, the entry shows the first 5 characters of the primary and/or secondary MOS code which includes the 3 characters of the MOS, the fourth character of skill and grade level in the MOS, and the fifth character of a special qualification identifier (SQI), if applicable. The evidence...