RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF: .
BOARD DATE: 2 October 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR200070005803
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mr. Michael L. Engle
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Ms. Ann M. Campbell
Chairperson
Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas
Member
Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage. The applicant also requests to personally appear before the Board.
2. The applicant states that when he retired from the United States Army on
1 August 1993, he had elected SBP coverage for his spouse. At the time of his divorce on 20 April 2004, he was required by the court to retain this SBP coverage for his former spouse. Beginning 1 May 2004, he ensured that the SBP cost was deducted from his retired pay. However, he did not know that he was required to affirmatively elect former spouse coverage after his divorce in order to continue annuity coverage for his ex-wife. As a result of his remarriage on 25 December 2006, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) automatically terminated his SBP and returned the entire cost of the SBP by check to both he and his former spouse. The applicant further states that his greatest concern in this matter is to be in compliance with the Divorce Courts order. He wants his former spouse to be the beneficiary under his SBP and never intended anything different.
3. The applicant provides copies of his divorce decree; retiree account statements; marriage certificate; letter, dated 1 March 2007;and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letters, dated 23 February 2006 and
24 March 2007.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 7 June 1961, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the Regular Army. He remained on active duty through a series of assignments until his retirement for length of service on 1 August 1993. He had attained the rank of lieutenant general, pay grade O-9, and had completed 32 years, 1 month, and
24 days of creditable active service.
2. On 20 April 2004, the applicant was divorced from his former spouse. The Divorce Decree, which includes the Separation Agreement dated 15 April 2004, stated, in effect, that the former spouse is entitled to retain SBP benefits until such time as she should remarry, and that the applicant was responsible for the cost of the premiums.
3. The applicant married his current spouse on 25 December 2006.
4. The applicants Retiree Account Statements for the period from 1 September 2004 to 1 February 2007, show that he was enrolled in the SBP with full coverage for spouse only. Effective 1 March 2007, his Retiree Account Statement shows that the SBP coverage was discontinued due to no SBP election being reflected on his account.
5. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
6. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.
7. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(2) permits a person, incident to a proceeding of divorce, to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse if required by court order to do so. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one
year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requested a personal appearance before the Board; however, since there is sufficient evidence on the record to fully consider this case, a formal hearing is not warranted.
2. The applicants retired pay account shows that he was enrolled in the SBP for spouse only coverage and the premium payments were deducted from his retired pay.
3. When the applicant divorced in April 2004, the Divorce Decree required him to continue the SBP coverage for the benefit of his former spouse until such time as she might remarry. There is no evidence showing that his former spouse made a request for a deemed election. Furthermore, it appears that the applicant did not understand that at the time of his divorce that an affirmative SBP election was required to change his election from spouse only to former spouse. Hence, when he remarried in 2006, DFAS automatically cancelled all SBP coverage due to his not submitting an SBP election.
4. It appears that the applicant intended to comply with the court order to provide his SBP coverage to his first wife and that his not making a former spouse election at the time of his divorce was due to his misunderstanding of the requirement to do so. Therefore, the applicants records should be corrected effective1 May 2004 to show that he elected to participate in the SBP for former spouse coverage at the full base amount.
BOARD VOTE:
__ AMC__ __JCR_ _ __LMD _ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that effective 1 May 2004, he submitted an SBP election for former spouse coverage at the full base amount. Furthermore, that DFAS audit the applicants retired pay account and, based on this correction, make the necessary monetary adjustments to properly restore his retired pay account, and recover the necessary premiums that were previously refunded.
__ Ann M. Campbell ____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070005803
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20071002
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
. . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
137
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000113C071029
The FSM's Retiree Account Statement, with an effective date 2 December 2003 and with a new pay due date of 2 January 2004 shows he elected full SBP coverage (to provide a 55% annuity amount), for spouse only. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an election. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026946
The evidence of record shows that when the FSM retired in 2006, he elected SBP for spouse coverage. In 2008, the FSM and the applicant were divorced. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of their divorce in February 2008; b. showing his request was timely received and processed by the appropriate DFAS office; and c....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000357
The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 27 January 1957. The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 4 November 1961. The evidence of record shows the applicant remarried and his second spouse (C_____ A. Y____) became eligible for the spouse SBP coverage, as SBP coverage is governed by category; however, they also later divorced There is no evidence of record to show the applicant took any action to request a change to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016527
The applicant provides a self-authored statement; Decree of Divorce; a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment; State of Alaska, Fourth Judicial District Court Order; Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letter, dated 22 January 2009; Retiree Account Statements; third-party letter; and DFAS letters, dated 17 February 2009 and 11 June 2009. On 22 January 2009, in response to an application for payment from the former spouse DFAS informed her that if her divorce decree...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017490
h. She is the FSM's former spouse in name only. Therefore, as a matter of equity and compassion, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's record to show he elected former spouse SBP coverage at the time of his divorce, with the applicant as the authorized beneficiary, and to provide the applicant the SBP annuity due from the date of the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the FSM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004219
This letter further notified the applicant that if her divorce decree specified that she were to be designated as a former spouse beneficiary for the SBP, she must make a "deemed election" for SBP coverage within one year of the date of the divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000247
The applicant and Executrix of the FSM's estate contend the FSM's records should be corrected to show he participated in the SBP with former spouse coverage because the final judgment of the divorce decree awarded the applicant the FSM's SBP as a former spouse and the FSM attempted to notify DFAS of this on several occasions. d. Thus, the evidence of record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM's SBP election from spouse to former spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015527
The applicant requests that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of her ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his election to former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 30 June 1998 and elected SBP spouse coverage. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, and it appears the FSM did not change his election to former spouse coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003619C070205
The applicant provides a DA Form 5002 (SBP Election); the FSM’s Alimony Support Statement; a General Power of Attorney; a DFAS-CL Form 5890-2 (Designation of Beneficiary Information); the FSM’s Retiree Account Statement; the FSM’s Last Will and Testament; the FSM’s and the applicant’s joint bank account statement; an Assignment of Proceeds of Insurance with a listing of funeral expenses; a divorce decree; and the FSM’s Certificate of Death. There is no evidence that either the FSM or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015984C070206
John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a...