RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 November 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005713
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Ms. Antoinette Farley
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. James E. Anderholm
Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols
Member
Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his Social Security (SSN) be corrected in his military service records.
2. The applicant states that his SSN on his separation document should read xxx-84-xxxx instead of xxx-24-xxxx.
3. The applicant provides a copy of an unsigned Social Security Card with a SSN of xxx-84-xxxx in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army on 5 August 1969. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91B20 (Medical Specialist). Upon completion of his training, he was assigned to the 543rd Medical Dispensary from 23 March 1970 through 20 March 1971, in Korea. The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/pay grade E-4.
3. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that, on 21 March 1971, he was honorably separated from active duty, as an early overseas returnee and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his service obligation.
4. The applicant's DD Form 214, Item 3 (Social Security Number) shows his SSN as xxx-24-xxxx.
5. Item 1 (Name and Service Number) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which covers the period from 5 August 1969 through
21 March 1971 shows his SSN as xxx-24-xxxx.
6. The applicant's records contain a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), dated
30 April 1969 shows his SSN as xxx-24-xxxx.
7. The applicant's records contain DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated
10 September 1969 documented his request for Classification as a Conscientious Objector. This request shows the applicants SSN as xxx-24-xxxx and the applicant signed the request.
8. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant's SSN as xxx-84-xxxx.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his correct SSN is xxx-84-xxxx instead of
xxx-24-xxxx.
2. The available records show that during the applicant's period of military service he continuously used the SSN of xxx-24-xxxx; this is verified by his signature.
3. The applicants desire to have his records changed is understood, however, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes. The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.
4. The applicant has failed to establish a basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records. However, the Record of Proceedings will be filed in the applicant's military records; therefore, a record of the additional SSN issued by the Social Security Administration will be on hand.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___JEA _ __LE ___ __JCR __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____James E. Anderholm___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070005713
SUFFIX
RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002135
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his: * social security number (SSN) as "xxx-x4-xxxx" instead of "xxx-x0-xxxx" * place of birth as "Cleveland" instead of "Clevelan" 2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant provided the requested SSN and place of birth during his accession processing. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002135
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his: * social security number (SSN) as "xxx-x4-xxxx" instead of "xxx-x0-xxxx" * place of birth as "Cleveland" instead of "Clevelan" 2. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant provided the requested SSN and place of birth during his accession processing. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003181
The applicant requests correction of the social security number (SSN) listed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect xxx-8x-xxxx. The applicant states the SSN on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. His record contains the following documents showing his SSN as xxx-8x-xxxx, the number he claims is correct: * DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 8 June 1969 * DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request), dated 24 June 1969 *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014426
The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that was created upon the applicant's entrance into the Army shows his SSN as xx5-xx-xxxxx. The DA Form 20 was audited on 16 December 1971 and the applicant authenticated this form by placing his signature in Item 47 (Signature of Individual). The evidence of records show the applicant used the number 4 as the third digit of his SSN when he enlisted. Therefore, lacking convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009217
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 1967 shows his SSN as xxx-x8-xxxx. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 July 1969 to show his SSN as it appears on his Social Security card.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014644
His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract Armed Forces of the United States) shows his SSN as "XXX-92-XXXX"; however, other official documents prepared that day show his SSN as "XXX-82-XXXX." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant accurately represented his SSN as "XXX-82-XXXX" upon enlistment in the Regular Army. It appears that his DD Form 4 was prepared incorrectly and he did not notice his SSN was incorrect prior to authenticating the form.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016447
His records contain the following: * SO Number 116 (Induction Orders), dated 11 June 1969, which lists his SSN as "526-XX-XXXX" * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), dated 18 February 1970, which lists his SSN as "526-XX-XXXX" * SO Number 240, dated 28 August 1970, which lists his SSN as "562-XX-XXXX' * DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 14 September 1970, which lists his SSN as "526-XX-XXXX" 3. Item 3 of his DD Form 214 lists his SSN as "562-XX-XXXX." As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018700
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SSN) as "xxx-76-xxx" instead of "xxx-67-xxxx." The evidence of record shows at the time of his enlistment, the applicant listed his SSN as "xxx-76-xxxx" (the requested SSN). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 3 of his DD Form 214 the current SSN * adding to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020659
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and his social security card with associated documents. During the processing of the applicant's enlistment he completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 7 September 1966, wherein he entered his SSN as "xxx-38-xxxx." Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022893
His Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a: a. DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record Armed Forces of the United States) that shows a service number, not an SSN; b. DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data), signed by the applicant, dated 23 June 1969, that shows in Item 9 (SSN) the entry "xxx-4x-xxxx"; c. VA Form 29-8286 (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election), signed by the applicant, dated 1 July 1969, that shows his SSN as "xxx-4x-xxxx"; d. DA Form 3082-R (Statement of Medical...