Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004686C071029
Original file (20070004686C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        30 August 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070004686


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano          |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Bernard P. Ingold             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Thomas M. Ray                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Gerald J. Purcell             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to
show he is entitled to retain his Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill
(MGIB) benefits.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) sent him a letter stating he owes a debt due to
unsatisfactory completion or participation in the Selected Reserve MGIB.
He was medically discharged.  He was not separated due to unsatisfactory
participation.

3.  The applicant provides an extract from Army Regulation 135-7; a DFAS
Account Statement, dated 3 January 2007; a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation
Board (PEB) Proceedings); a Physical Disability Information Report; and
discharge orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had about 6 years of prior service in the Regular Army
plus prior service in the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in
the USAR on         18 September 2000 for 6 years.  On this date, he signed
a DA Form 5436 (Statement of Understanding – The Selected Reserve
Montgomery GI Bill). Section VII, paragraph 1 of this form stated he
understood that his entitlement to educational assistance would be
terminated if he were declared an unsatisfactory participant.  Paragraph 2c
of this form stated he understood that his entitlement to educational
assistance would be terminated if he were discharged or separated from the
Selected Reserve except for disability that occurred after his eligibility
date and which was not the result of his own misconduct.

2.  On 2 March 2005, an informal PEB found the applicant to be physically
unfit, with a zero percent disability rating, due to chronic bilateral foot
pain due to pes planus (flat feet).  There was evidence to support a
finding that his condition existed prior to service (EPTS) and was not
permanently aggravated beyond natural progression by his service.  The PEB
recommended he be separated without disability benefits.  On 30 March 2005,
the applicant concurred with the findings of the informal PEB and waived a
formal hearing of his case.

3.  On 12 June 2005, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR.

4.  On 3 January 2007, DFAS billed the applicant for a debt in the amount
of $653.48 for unsatisfactory completion or participation in the Reserve
MGIB.  Repayment of unearned funds was required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was not separated from the USAR for unsatisfactory
participation.

2.  Section VII, paragraph 7 of the applicant’s DA Form 5436 stated he
understood that his entitlement to educational assistance would be
terminated if he were discharged or separated from the Selected Reserve
except for disability that occurred after his eligibility date and which
was not the result of his own misconduct.

3.  Even though the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 12 June 2005
for having a physically unfitting condition that was determined to be EPTS
and not service aggravated, that condition did not become a disability that
made him medically unfit for retention until more than 15 years after he
initially entered the service and almost 5 years after he enlisted in the
USAR.  Because he had been paid some MGIB benefits, it is a reasonable
presumption that his condition did not become a disability until after his
MGIB eligibility date.  Therefore, his MGIB entitlement should not have
been terminated.

BOARD VOTE:

__bpi___  __tmr___  __gjp___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  showing that he was not discharged from the USAR on 12 June 2005
as a result of unsatisfactory completion or participation in the Reserve
MGIB;

     b.  showing that he was discharged from the USAR on 12 June 2005 as a
result of a disability that occurred after his MGIB eligibility date and
which was not the result of his own misconduct; and

     c.  as a result of the above corrections, cancelling the applicant’s
MGIB debt.




                                  __Bernard P. Ingold___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20070004686                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070830                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Ms. Mitrano                             |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.10                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013607

    Original file (20090013607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his unit commander at the 414th Civil Affairs (CA) Battalion gave him an unsatisfactory participation for a drill weekend without trying to contact him. The applicant provides a self-authored supplementary letter; a DVA rating decision, undated; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 30 March 2004; a 414th Civil Affairs Battalion, memorandum, dated 3 December 2007, Subject: Letter of Instructions-Unexcused Absence; a DVA...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008061

    Original file (20050008061.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he received a medical discharge. The applicant has provided insufficient evidence to the Board that shows those injuries would have interfered with his ability to perform military duties. There is evidence to show he had already completed a baccalaureate degree when he signed up for the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026565

    Original file (20100026565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a Standard Form 507 (Clinical Record), dated 22 April 2006, which shows he stated that his asthma prevented him from performing his military duties. He was medically boarded and determined unfit for duty and was separated from military service on 16 August 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001279

    Original file (20110001279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she feels she does not owe any of the money she received from the MGIB. The Certificate and Acknowledgment – USAR – Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment (Reserves Annex), section IV (Service Obligation), dated 25 October 2003, shows the applicant agreed to serve 6 years as an assigned member of a troop program unit (TPU) in the Selected Reserve and 2 years as an assigned member of the IRR. Her enlistment contract with annex clearly states she was obligated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008852

    Original file (20060008852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her enlistment contract be changed to reflect enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for 1 year instead of the currently shown 6 years recorded on her DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment / Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) dated, 29 September 2005. The applicant states, in effect, that she reenlisted in the USAR for 6 years, with the understanding that she would receive a Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB). The applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007136

    Original file (20070007136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was told by his Unit Administrator that if he did not strive to go in front of the Medical Review Board for his knee that he would receive an uncharacterized discharge and never would have any debt whatsoever to the military. However, the applicant has provided no evidence to show what his knee condition was at the time of or shortly before his separation for nonparticipation in October 2005 so it cannot be determined if it was such as to warrant referral to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005867

    Original file (20080005867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a letter from the San Bernardino (CA) Department of Veterans Affairs dated 29 January 2008, he was informed that he would have to submit a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) in order to establish his eligibility for the MGIB-SR program. It would, therefore, be appropriate to show that he completed his IADT requirement on 22 May 1999, vice 12 August 2000, and that he had 6 years of satisfactory participation in the Selected Reserve on 21 May 2005, thus qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004553

    Original file (20090004553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DFAS Leave and Earnings Statements for the period from 1 February 1997 through 31 January 1998 show that $100.00 per month for 12 months was deducted from his military pay for the purpose of MGIB enrollment. In June 2000, the applicant applied to this Board for relief of his ROTC debt to the U.S. Government based on his active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011170

    Original file (20080011170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he was not excused from the unit drills and lost his SLRP and MGIB benefits for unsatisfactory participation. In this statement, the Army Reserve Recruiter states that during the time frame the applicant was receiving "U's" for not attending his unit drills, he had personally called the applicant's unit (399th Military Intelligence Battalion) to inform the unit administrator that the college course the applicant was enrolled in required him to attend class on Saturdays. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007136C080213

    Original file (20070007136C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was told by his Unit Administrator that if he did not strive to go in front of the Medical Review Board for his knee that he would receive an uncharacterized discharge and never would have any debt whatsoever to the military. However, the applicant has provided no evidence to show what his knee condition was at the time of or shortly before his separation for nonparticipation in October 2005 so it cannot be determined if it was such as to warrant referral to a...