RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 6 November 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004636
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Mr. Kenneth L. Wright
Chairperson
Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas
Member
Mr. Michael J. Flynn
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his records by amending his mobilization orders to cover an existing 52-day mobilization gap from 2 December 2005 through 22 January 2006.
2. The applicant states that due to his and the chain of command's misunderstanding of the mobilization process and the regulation that covers temporary change of station (TCS), he did not demobilize from active duty upon completion of his mobilization period. He further states that he should have been demobilized on 2 December 2005, but had a TCS order that covered his active duty for a period of 180 days. He concludes that he continued on active duty until 9 January 2007.
3. The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application:
a. 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Orders Number 05-028-0005, dated 28 January 2005, assignment orders.
b. 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Orders Number 05-028-0006, dated 28 January 2005, mobilization orders.
c. 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Orders Number 05-097-00017, dated 7 April 2005, mobilization orders.
d. Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, Orders 299-300-4-1, dated 26 October 2005, TCS Orders.
e. Headquarters, 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Orders 05-300-0003, dated 27 October 2005, assignment orders.
f. 75th Division, Houston, Texas, Orders 06-024-00044, dated 24 January 2006, mobilization orders.
g. 90th Regional Readiness Command Annual Duty Training (ADT) Orders for January and February 2007.
h. Memorandum, dated 22 February 2007, from applicant's commander to 75th Division to resolve the break in service issue.
i. Memorandum, unsigned, from the applicant's commander to HRC, to amend the mobilization orders.
k. Applicant's Chronological Statement of Retired Points.
l. Applicant's attendance calendar for December 2005 and January 2006.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is a master sergeant (MSG), who is a member of the U.S. Army Reserve since August 1981 and holds military occupational specialty (MOS) 13Z (Field Artillery Senior Sergeant). He was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 354th Field Artillery (2/354 FA), Wichita Falls, Texas. His unit of assignment is subordinate to 1st Brigade (Training) of the 95th Division (Institutional Training).
2. On 28 January 2005, 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published Orders Number 05-028-0005, releasing the applicant from his unit of assignment with a Unit Identification Code (UIC) W751AA and further assigning him to Detachment 1 of the same unit, UIC W751Y1.
3. On 28 January 2005, 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published Orders Number 05-028-0006, mobilizing the applicant on active duty for a period of 93 days in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (Other than Homeland). The applicant was ordered to report to Detachment 1 of 2/354 FA (W751Y1) and then proceed to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, on 2 February 2005. Orders Number 05-032-00012, dated 1 February 2005 amended the period of active duty to 90 days and the report date to Fort Sill as 5 February 2005. The end date of mobilization was 5 May 2005.
4. On 7 April 2005, the 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published Orders Number 05-097-00017, mobilizing the applicant on active duty for a period of 210 days in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (Other than Homeland), effective 6 May 2005. The applicant was ordered to report to Detachment 2 (W751Y2) of 2/354 FA and then proceed to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, on 6 May 2005. The end date of mobilization was 1 December 2005.
5. The applicant's record confirms that he performed duties of first sergeant (1SG) from February 2005 to October 2005 at the U.S. Army Field Artillery Training Center, Fort Sill, Oklahoma.
6. On 26 October 2005 and while the applicant was still mobilized under the 95th Division Mobilization Order through 1 December 2005, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, published Orders 299-300-4-1, assigning the applicant to 2nd Simulation Exercise Group, 75th Division (W86W04), Fort Sill, Oklahoma, effective 28 October 2005, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, for a period of 180 days.
7. The applicant's record confirms that he performed duties of senior observer/controller from November 2005 to July 2006 at the 2nd Simulation Exercise Group (SEG), 75th Division, Fort Sill, Oklahoma.
8. On 27 October 2005, the 95th Division, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, published Orders Number 05-300-00003, reassigning the applicant from his 2/354th Artillery Troop Program Unit (TPU) to another TPU outside the command-the 2nd SEG, 75th Division, Fort Sill, Oklahoma.
9. On 24 January 2006, the 75th Division, Houston, Texas, published Orders Number 06-024-00044, mobilizing the applicant on active duty for a period of 352 days, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (Other than Homeland), effective 27 January 2006. The applicant was ordered to report to Detachment 6 (W86WY6) of 1st Brigade, 75th Division, Houston, Texas, and then proceed to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, on 27 January 2006
10. On 10 January 2007, the applicant was released from active duty. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release confirms that he entered on active duty this period on 2 February 2005 (the date of his mobilization) and was released from active duty on 10 January 2007 (the date his 75th Division Orders directed) and transferred to Detachment 6, 1st Brigade, 75th Division.
11. On 22 February 2007, the commander, 2nd SEG, submitted a memorandum to the 75th Division G-1, requesting the applicant's "undocumented break in service" from 2 December 2005 through 22 January 2006 be corrected. The commander explained that the applicant did not demobilize and return to his U.S. Army Reserve unit, on 2 December 2005 in accordance with the 95th Division Mobilization Order.
12. On 9 March 2007, the commander, 2nd SEG, submitted another memorandum through USAR G-1 to the commander, HRC, Alexandria, Virginia, requesting the applicant's "undocumented break in service" from 2 December 2005 through 22 January 2006 be corrected. The commander explained that the applicant did not demobilize and return to his U.S. Army Reserve unit, on 2 December 2005 in accordance with the 95th Division Mobilization Order.
13. An advisory opinion was obtained on 10 September 2007 in the processing of this case. The USAR G-1 stated that Department of the Army (DA) Amendment Orders 621-05 directed that Detachment 2 of the 2/354th Artillery be added to Mobilization Orders 576-04 and ordered to active duty for 365 days effective 6 May 2004 (later extended to 575 days). On 2 February 2005, the applicant was mobilized with the 95th Division for 93 days, later extended through 1 December 2005. On 26 October 2005, the applicant received TCS Orders to the 2nd SEG, 75th Division. The only purpose of the TCS Orders was to reassign the applicant temporarily, from one duty location to another. On 1 December 2005, Detachment 2 of the 2/354th Artillery, 95th Division, demobilized in accordance with Demobilization Order 166-06. The applicant and two other members of the unit remained on active duty without proper authority. The USAR G-1 further adds that the USAR Headquarters contacted the previous S-1 of the 1st Brigade, 75th Division, who stated that he did not believe there was any confusion about the use of TCS Orders. The USAR G-1 concluded that the USAR headquarters contacted the DA G-3 and requested an amendment to cover the three Soldiers who remained on active duty after the unit demobilized, but the DA G-3 refused to amend the mobilization Orders.
14. On 10 September 2007, the applicant was provided a copy of the USAR G-1 advisory opinion in order to have an opportunity to respond to its contents. The applicant has not responded to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by amending his mobilization orders to cover an existing 52-day mobilization gap from 2 December 2005 through 22 January 2006.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
3. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was mobilized with the 95th Division for the period 2 February 2005 through 1 December 2005. Upon the unit's demobilization on 1 December 2005, the applicant failed to demobilize with his unit. The fact that the applicant failed to demobilize with his unit and remained on active duty without authorization does not constitute that an error or injustice occurred in the orders issued in this case. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the application in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__klw___ __lmd___ __mjf___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
Kenneth L. Wright
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070004636
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20071106
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
113.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004727
He further states that he should have been demobilized on 2 December 2005, but had a TCS order that covered his active duty for a period of 180 days. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his release confirms that he entered on active duty this period on 21 April 2005 (the date of his mobilization) and was released from active duty on 9 January 2007 (the date his 75th Division Orders directed) and transferred to the 2nd Simulation Exercise Group (SEG), 75th Division, Fort Sill,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000605
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 JUNE 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000605 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders Number A-06-512765 dated 6 June 2005 shows that the applicant was retained on active duty, beyond his orders expiration date, and was assigned to the Medical Retention Center, Fort Sill, Oklahoma effective 3 June 2005. U.S. Army Human Resources Command Orders Number B-08-606086 dated 21 August 2006 shows that the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007191
The applicant further requests reassignment to unit through a direct antedated enlistment; award of full credit for active duty service with all back pay and allowances, including weekends and holidays; dismissal of allegations made at the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy; removal of DA Form 268 (Report to Suspend Personnel Actions (Flag)), dated 26 August 2003, DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 August 2003, 7 August 2003, 22 August 2003, and 28 August 2003; and approval of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010527
According to the applicant's application for correction of military records, he requested the approval of an ADME for the period between 15 January and 11 August 2005, with entitlement to all back pay and allowances as a result of a left knee injury he suffered while serving on active duty in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). However, medical records from the applicant indicate that the prior injury and subsequent surgery were for his left knee. In his rebuttal statement, he stated: * his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331
The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018089
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he enlisted in the Regular Army as a sergeant first class. The opinion stated the applicant received a grade determination in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 upon his entry into the Regular Army in February 2007. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he enlisted in the Regular Army as a sergeant first class.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007506
The applicant states that his original request was denied because the Record of Proceedings stated he was assigned to the 42d Infantry Division from 5 October 2004 until his release from active duty and as such he never occupied a COLs position in the NYARNG. The applicant provides a Headquarters, SSS order, dated 1 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 9 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 1 October 2004; release from active duty orders; two promotion memoranda, both dated 18 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007506C080213
The applicant states that his original request was denied because the Record of Proceedings stated he was assigned to the 42d Infantry Division from 5 October 2004 until his release from active duty and as such he never occupied a COLs position in the NYARNG. The applicant provides a Headquarters, SSS order, dated 1 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 9 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 1 October 2004; release from active duty orders; two promotion memoranda, both dated 18 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007506
The applicant states that his original request was denied because the Record of Proceedings stated he was assigned to the 42d Infantry Division from 5 October 2004 until his release from active duty and as such he never occupied a COL’s position in the NYARNG. The applicant provides a Headquarters, SSS order, dated 1 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 9 December 2002; transfer orders, dated 1 October 2004; release from active duty orders; two promotion memoranda, both dated 18 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017608
AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. A temporary profile is given if the condition is considered temporary, the correction or treatment of the condition is medically advisable, and...