Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001788
Original file (20070001788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	    


	BOARD DATE:	  24 July 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070001788 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. John Infante

Chairperson

Ms. Rose M. Lys

Member

Mr. James R. Hastie

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her Data for Retired Pay (DA Form 3713) and Retirement Letter dated 23 June 1993, to show her correct period of active military service.  

2.  The applicant states that she was ill at the time of her retirement and did not notice the error on the reverse of her retirement letter.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), and her retirement letter dated 23 June 1993.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 23 June 1993, the date of her retirement due to physical disability.  The application submitted in this case is dated 25 January 2007.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 1 September 1970, the applicant entered active duty as a United States Army Reserve Soldier, in the rank of private first class, pay grade E3, for duty as a student nurse at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

4.  On 31 May 1974, the applicant was released from active duty.  She had completed 3 years and 9 months of creditable active duty.

5.  On 11 July 1974, the applicant entered the Regular Army.  She was awarded specialty 66H9B (Medical-Surgical Nurse) and served until her retirement due to physical disability on 23 June 1993.  She had attained the rank of lieutenant colonel, pay grade O5, and had completed a total of 22 years, 8 months and 
13 days of creditable active military service. 

6.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending on 23 June 1993, shows in Item 12 (Record of Service) that she entered active duty this period on 11 July 1974 and was retired effective 23 June 1993, for a period of net active service of
18 years, 11 months, and 12 days. [This is a mathematical error.  It should read 13 days.] 

7.  On 23 June 1993, the Director for Retired/Annuitant Pay, Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) issued the applicant a letter of welcome to the retired rolls of the United States Army.  The reverse side of this letter indicates that her retirement date was 24 June 1993, in the retired pay grade of O5.  It shows her service for basic pay as 22 years, 9 months and 23 days. [This includes 1 month and 11 days of inactive Reserve time from 1 June to 10 July 1974.]  Her service for retired pay is shown as 18 years, 11 months and 13 days.

8.  DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay) shows in Item 26 (Computation of Years of Service Credited for Retirement or Retired Pay) 18 years, 11 months, and 
13 days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant served on active duty for a total of 22 years, 8 months, and 13 days and had 22 years, 9 months and 23 days of creditable service for retired pay.  

2.  Therefore, her records should be corrected to show that she had 22 years, 
8 months and 13 days of active duty creditable for retirement.

3.  Item 12 (Record of Service) of the Applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 June 1993, incorrectly shows on line 12c (Net Active Service This Period) 18 years, 11 months and 12 days. This is a mathematical error and should be corrected to read 18 years, 11 months and 13 days.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 23 June 1993; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
22 June 1996.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence or argument, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.




BOARD VOTE:

__ JRH __  __JI ____  __RML _  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

a.  Reissuing her retirement letter to correct that portion showing that she had completed 18 years, 11 months, and 13 days, to read as 22 years, 8 months and 13 days of active duty service; and

b.  correcting all related records at DFAS to show that she has completed 22 years, 8 months and 13 days of active duty service; 

c.  correcting Item 12c of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 June 1993, to read 18 years, 11 months, and 13 days.





__          John Infante ______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070724 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
 
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
136.0200
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008580

    Original file (20130008580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her military records to show at the time of retirement her rank/grade was colonel (COL)/O-6 vice lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O5. Since she did not serve in the grade of COL for 3 years in an active status, she is not entitled to the benefits associated with that promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008441

    Original file (20100008441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's records to show she is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits. The applicant provides copies of: * two self-authored Petitions * birth certificates for the FSM, herself, and their son * her and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Retirement Orders * the FSM’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * the FSM's certificate of death * a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014482

    Original file (20100014482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states her retired pay is based on her retirement in pay grade O-3, but it should be based on the pay grade of O-3E as she served 8 years as an enlisted member. The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 29 December 1969 * DA Form 3286-1, -2, and -3 (Statements of Enlistment), all dated 29 December 1969 * DD Form 373 (Consent, Declaration of Parent or Legal Guardian), dated 29 October 1969 * Two DA Forms 1695 (Oath of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014988

    Original file (20060014988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her deceased spouse's, a former service member (FSM), military records to show his retirement rank and pay grade as lieutenant colonel, O5. On 21 March 1972, the FSM requested to reenlist in the United States Army and a grade determination was requested. The evidence of record clearly shows that the FSM served on active duty as a commissioned officer for more than 11 years, attaining the rank of major, pay grade O4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001925

    Original file (20070001925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 10 June 1993, be corrected to show 4 years of constructive service credit for completing dental school prior to entering active duty. The applicant provides copies of the following documents in support of his application: a. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with a separation effective date of 1 September 1966; b. DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016945

    Original file (20130016945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (Record of Service – Separation Date This Period) the entry "93 – 01 – 31," indicating he was separated from the Army on 31 January 1993. d. Item 12c. The evidence of record shows his SSN was consistently represented as 391-XX-XXXX throughout his period of military service, with the exception of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 January 1993. Upon review of his relevant service documents (i.e., DD Forms 214, appointment orders, retirement orders, and DA Form 3713), and when adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020607

    Original file (20100020607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. an amendment to item 12b (Separation Date This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 2006 to show she separated on 1 November 2008; b. to be awarded all Active Duty (AD) points she would have earned had she separated on 1 November 2008; and c. all due back pay as a result of these corrections. Also during this period, a memorandum from JFHQ, AG Department, Subject: Notification of Approved...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000026

    Original file (20120000026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 December 1993 and 8 May 2000, as follows: * Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) * Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaigns Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal 2. The applicant provides: * 1993 and 2000 DD Forms 214 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060009246C071029

    Original file (AR20060009246C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an application to this Board dated 20 February 2006, the applicant requested correction of the term of service according to his records. The evidence of record shows that he is entitled to correction of his records and back pay as requested. The available evidence of records show that he was inducted into the Army on 15 September 1967 and he remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments until he as was released from active duty for the purpose of retirement on 28 February 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000391

    Original file (20140000391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders S144-4, dated 27 July 1981 * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 November 1981 shows his rank as SFC and his pay grade as E-7. This regulation states that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214.