Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001291C071029
Original file (20070001291C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        10 July 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070001291


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano          |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Kathleen A. Newman            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Susan A. Powers               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Edward E. Montgomery          |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his reentry (RE) code.


2.  The applicant states, in effect, it has been 20 years since his
discharge and he would like to reenlist.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of
his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 11 June 1986.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
18 January 2007.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and
entered active duty on 6 September 1984.  He was trained in and awarded
military occupational specialty (MOS) 31C (Single Channel Radio Operator),
and private first class (PFC) is the highest rank he attained while serving
on active duty.

4.  The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows he
was reduced to private/E-1 (PV1) on 9 May 1986.  It also shows that during
his active duty tenure, he earned the Army Service Ribbon.  His record
documents no acts of valor, significant achievement or service warranting
special recognition.

5.  The applicant's disciplinary history includes his accrual of 59 days of
time lost due to two separate periods of being absent without leave (AWOL)
and 1 period of confinement.  It also includes his Summary Court-Martial
(SCM) conviction on 2 May 1986.  He was found guilty of two specifications
of violating Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) by
twice being AWOL; and of violating Article 121 of the UCMJ for stealing
$1,040.00.  The resultant sentence was a reduction to PV1, forfeiture of
$425.00 and confinement for 30 days.
6.  The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of a
separation packet containing the specific facts and circumstances
surrounding his separation processing.  The record does contain a properly
constituted separation document (DD Form 214) that contains the authority
and reason for the applicant's discharge.

7.  The DD Form 214 on file shows that on 11 June 1986, the applicant was
discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-
200, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense, his service
was characterized as under honorable conditions and he received a general
discharge (GD).  It also shows that based on the authority and reason for
his separation, the applicant was assigned a Separation Program Designator
Code of JBK and an RE code of RE-4/3b.  The DD Form 214 further shows that
at the time of his discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 7 months,
and 17 days of creditable active military service and had accrued 59 days
of time lost due to AWOL and confinement.

8.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and
procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the
United States Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes
basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That
chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.
RE-4 applies to persons who have a nonwaivable disqualification.  RE-3
applies to persons who have a waivable disqualification.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities
(regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active
duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states, in
pertinent part, that the SPD code JKQ is the appropriate code to assign to
Soldiers separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, by reason of
commission of a serious offense.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table
indicates that RE-3 is the proper code to assign members separated with SPD
code JKQ.

10.  The SPD code regulation identifies the SPD code of JKB as the proper
code to assign members separated by reason of a civil conviction, and the
SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that the RE code of RE-3 is also
the proper RE code to assign members separated with a SPD code of JKB.  The
version of the table in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge
stipulated that the
RE-3b would be assigned to members who accrued time lost due to AWOL during
the period covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for a change to his RE code was carefully
considered and found to have merit.  By regulation, both the one in effect
at the time of the applicant's discharge and under the current version of
the regulation, the proper SPD code to assign members separated under the
provisions of Paragraph
14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a
serious offense, is JKQ and the RE code assignment is RE-3.

2.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at discharge erroneously
assigned a SPD code of JKB and an RE code of RE-4/RE-3b.  Therefore, it
would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity and justice to
correct the applicant's DD Form 214 by deleting the current entry in Item
26 (Separation Code) and replacing it with the SPD code of "JKQ" and by
deleting the current entry in Item 27 (Reenlistment Code) and replacing it
with the entry "RE-3".

3.  The applicant is advised that RE-3 applies to persons who are not
considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service; however, it
does allow for a waiver of the disqualification.  Therefore, if he desires
to reenlist, he should contact a local recruiter to determine his
eligibility.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as
to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers
of RE codes.

BOARD VOTE:

__KAN __  __SAP__  __EEM__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by amending his 6 September 1986 DD Form
214 by deleting the current entry in Item 26 and replacing it with the
entry "JKQ" and deleting the current entry in Item 27 and replacing it with
the entry "RE-3"; and by providing him a correction to his separation
document that includes these changes.




                                  _____Kathleen A. Newman____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20070001291                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2007/07/10                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |GD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1986/06/11                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Misconduct-Serious Offense              |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Ms. Mitrano                             |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018880

    Original file (20080018880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 June 2008, the applicant's commanding officer informed him that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14 (Separation for misconduct), paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a serious offense). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of "4" is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003122C070206

    Original file (20050003122C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of Item 25 (Separation Authority), Item 26 (Separation Code) and Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his 21 June 1994 separation document (DD Form 214). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s commander recommended his separation under the provisions of paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021630

    Original file (20100021630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a Serious Offense), Army Regulation 635-200, based on his period of AWOL from 20 February through 21 July 2009. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014292

    Original file (20080014292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 shows "KFS” and Item 27 shows "RE-4." An RE code of "4" was entered to his DD Form 214. The evidence of record also shows the applicant completed an honorable period of service from 10 July 1996 to 25 January 1999.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011869

    Original file (20110011869.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 April 2008, the separation authority approved separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense, with issuance of a general discharge. List additional specialty numbers and titles involving periods of one or more years)) - his primary specialty as “11B1O INFANTRYMAN – 1 YRS 3 MONTHS//NOTHING FOLLOWS”; b. item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) - he entered active duty on 22 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021620

    Original file (20090021620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 February 2008, the applicant's unit commander initiated action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011000

    Original file (AR20130011000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-5, section II, for misconduct, civil conviction. On 10 November 2010, the separation authority approved the waiver request and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provides in support of his application a DD Form 293 (Application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015689

    Original file (20140015689.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code and rank at separation. There is no evidence in the available records showing his rank was reduced to E-1 after his general court-martial conviction. The SPD code of JBK applies to Soldiers discharged for completion of required active service and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013741

    Original file (20090013741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he was separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of expiration of term of service. Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) shows that he was a private (E-1), item 12c (Net Active Service this Period) shows that he had 3 years of active service, item 26 (Separation Code) shows he was assigned an SPD code of LBK, and item 27 (Reentry Code) shows he was assigned an RE code of RE-4. Evidence of...