Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017604
Original file (20060017604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  .


	BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060017604 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mr. Michael L. Engle

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Chairperson

Mr. Ronald J. Weaver

Member

Mr. David W. Tucker

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his overseas deployment. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 shows his overseas deployment from 20 January 2003 to 1 June 2004 which is about 132 days.  He contends that he was deployed for 218 days.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a memorandum, dated 2 October 2003, showing he was away from his home for 218 days. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 28 November 2003, the date of his release from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 6 December 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 5 July 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 55B1O (Ammunition Specialist)

4.  On 28 November 2003, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had attained the rank of specialist, pay grade E4, and had completed 2 years, 4 months and 24 days of creditable active duty.

5.  Item 12f (Foreign Service) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 months and 12 days of overseas duty.  Item 18 (Remarks) of this same form shows that he served in Afghanistan from 20 January 2003 to 1 June 2003, a period of 4 months and 4 days.

6.  On 2 October 2003, the Personnel Sergeant, 3rd Battalion, 229th Aviation Regiment, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, provided the applicant a memorandum stating that he had "acquired 218 days during this PERSTEMPO [Personnel Tempo Policy] event."  This information was provided for out-processing purposes only.

7.  The fiscal year 2000 National Defense Authorization Act required all services to start tracking individual deployments with the start of fiscal year 2001.  The intent of the personnel tempo policy (PERSTEMPO) is to force commanders to better manage Soldier’s time away from home.  PERSTEMPO measures the time a member is deployed.  A Service member is considered “deployed” when that member is on orders and is performing duties in a training exercise or operation at a location or under circumstances that make it impossible or infeasible for the member to spend off-duty time in the housing at the member’s permanent duty station or home port.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The PERSTEMPO memorandum provided by the applicant indicates that he was away from his home for 218 days during a particular PERSTEMPO event.  However, it does not provide specific information as to what event or to where he was temporarily assigned.  

2.  The available evidence does not provide sufficient information on which to determine the accuracy of the applicant’s DD Form 214 regarding his foreign service.  

3.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should not be granted.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 28 November 2003; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
27 November 2006.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JCR __  ___DWT _  __RJW__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__Jeffrey C. Redmann____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060017604
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070524 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
  . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
 DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
120.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005531C070208

    Original file (040005531C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon application, any such service member may be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal in lieu of the GWOTEM for such service; however, no service member shall be entitled to award of the Iraq Campaign Medal and the GWOTEM for the same act, achievement or period of service. The evidence confirms that the applicant was deployed to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom for at least 30 consecutive days and as such, based on his request, is entitled to the Iraq Campaign Medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024701

    Original file (20100024701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Iraq Campaign Medal is awarded to members who served in direct support of OIF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: * in item 12f – change the period to "0001 01 24" * in item 13 – add the Iraq Campaign Medal with bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000687

    Original file (20080000687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his foreign service in block 12f and that his DD Form 214 reflect that he was deployed to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from 10 January 2003 to 14 September 2003. It states that, for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, the statement "SERVICE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006996

    Original file (20080006996.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also requests correction of his records to show his military schools. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal; the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal; the National Defense Service Medal, and adding these awards to item 13 (Decoration, Medals,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013837

    Original file (20140013837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his deployment dates. Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows 4 years and 1 day creditable active service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 April 2007 to show in: * item 12f, "0000/09/16" * item 18, "Service in Iraq...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014762

    Original file (20130014762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards. His active duty service and his specific service in support of OEF authorize him award of the GWOTSM, GWOTEM, and ACM with one bronze service star, which are not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 12f of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017886

    Original file (20090017886.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he deployed and served overseas on three separate occasions. As documentary evidence in support of this application, the applicant provides: a. two deployment orders; b. a NATO Travel Order; c. two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award); d. two award certificates; e. a memorandum; f. a DD Form 214; and g. a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). Therefore, the applicant is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01259

    Original file (BC-2007-01259.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPPR states after a through review of the applicant’s military record and the submitted documentation, they are unable to locate any source documentation to substantiate the applicant was in the area of eligibility (Iraq) for the awards requested. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 May 2007, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001474

    Original file (20140001474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. his correct Afghanistan and Iraq deployment dates; b. he was awarded or authorized the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM), Combat Action Badge (CAB), Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), and Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM). The applicant states: a. his DD Form 214 lists his deployment dates to Iraq as his Afghanistan deployment dates, and does not list his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015644

    Original file (20080015644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015644 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her foreign service in Kuwait.