SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 December 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060016468
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in
proceedings dated 7 November 2006 were affirmed. The following additional
findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Maria C. Sanchez | |Analyst |
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated 7 November 2006.
| |Ms. Linda D. Simmons | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | |Member |
| |Mr. Donald W. Steenfott | |Member |
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C – 7 November 2006 Record of Proceedings
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
26. On 29 November 2006, new information was received from the applicant
in regard to the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20060003005,
dated 7 November 2006.
27. The evidence submitted consists of the applicant's contention that his
request for promotion to major was not discussed in the original
proceedings.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
7. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number
AR20060003005, dated 7 November 2006, it was the intent of the ABCMR to
make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should
properly have been at the time.
8. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20060003005, failed to address
the applicant's request for promotion to the grade of major.
9. The transfer of the GOMOR to the restricted portion of his OMPF does
not mitigate the applicant's indiscipline. Therefore, there is no basis to
grant the applicant's request for promotion to the grade of major.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_LDS_ __ _PHM___ _DWS__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
promotion to the grade of major.
__Linda D. Simmons__
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR 20060016468 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20061205 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000204
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE: 15. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20060014006, failed to include the authorization to also amend the effective date of promotion to MAJ/O-4 and in effect, all back-pay and allowances when it adjusted the applicant's DOR from 20 October 2006 to 20 November 2005. BOARD VOTE: __le____ __jrs____ __lwr____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001430
His promotion eligibility date (PED) to LTC was 26 September 2006, but the Army failed to comply with the prior Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) finding to consider him at the 2007 AMEDD LTC Board. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Regardless of the error contained in the unit vacancy board promotion order, the fact remains that since the applicant is not eligible for mandatory promotion consideration to LTC, the Boards prior decision does not effect his unit vacancy...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004848
The applicant states, in effect, that he was selected for promotion to MAJ by the 2006 U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Major Special Selection Board and advised by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, to submit an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant provides copies of a Headquarters, USA HRC, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, St. Louis, Missouri, memorandum, dated 22 September 2006; Headquarters, USA HRC, Office of Promotions,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008985
The applicant requests, in effect, a military education waiver and promotion reconsideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant states, in effect, that he recently received a memorandum from U.S. Army Human Resources Command, dated 16 April 2007 informing him that he was not selected for promotion to major by the Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) that convened on 8 January 2007, and that this was his second...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001894C070205
The applicant provides Federal Recognition Orders Number 21 AR, dated 23 January 2006; AKARNG Element Joint Forces Headquarters Orders Number 349- 005, dated 15 December 2005; Federal Recognition Orders 311 AR, dated 31 October 2005; AKARNG Element Joint Forces Headquarters Orders Number 292- 009, dated 19 October 2005; NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 19 October 2005; AKARNG Element Joint Forces Headquarters Orders Number 290-005, dated 17 October...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003277C071029
The memorandum advised of the promotion and three alternatives which the applicant could request for consideration: a. the applicant could request to be selected for a vacancy and accept promotion with continued assignment to the NCARNG, or b. request delay of promotion with continued assignment to the NCARNG in the present grade, or c. transfer to the United States Army Reserve to accept promotion. After having reviewed the evidence and available regulatory guidance, the NGB, Personnel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003488
The applicant requests, in effect, that his record of punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 29 November 2006, be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). The decision to file the original DA Form 2627 on the P-Fiche or R-Fiche of the OMPF will be made by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states, in pertinent part, that application for removal of an Article 15 from a Soldier's OMPF based on error or injustice...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014006
The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his promotion date for major (MAJ) from 20 October 2006 to 20 November 2005. The AHRC-St. Louis issued an Eligibility for Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Not on Active Duty memorandum, dated 28 June 2005, indicating the applicant's selection for promotion to MAJ by the 2005 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) that adjourned on 25 March 2005. The applicant was eligible for promotion to MAJ with a date of rank of 20 November...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053664C070420
Therefore, since the contested OER was properly filed at the time, there was no error in his record when reviewed for promotion to major by the fiscal year FY99 selection board. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below, to show there is no longer a basis for the granting of his request. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by rescinding the Board’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004883C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he is requesting that the effective date of the transfer of the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) from the performance portion to the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be changed from 5 December 2006, the date of the ABCMR's recommendation to 16 August 2003, a year from when it was issued, in order for him to be reconsidered for promotion to MAJ by a SSB for the promotion years since 2003. He further indicates...