RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 June 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060014989
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
x
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election be changed from child only coverage, full base amount, to child only coverage at a reduced threshold amount.
2. The applicant states he was never briefed on a reduced/threshold amount during his SBP briefing. He states the DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) can be confusing on which block to check. After the SBP brief, he was told to sign [the DD Form 2656] and his wife signed the form. He looked into changing his election during an Open Season. He found out that the only thing he could do was take full SBP and would have to pay in over $12,000.00. In effect, he states that he was never briefed properly and he should be able to participate at the threshold amount without any penalties.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 2656.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was married on 4 October 1980. After having had prior enlisted service in the Regular Army, he was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer on 29 September 1989. He was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) on 29 September 1991.
2. The applicant was appointed in the Regular Army on 25 November 1996 as a promotable CW2. He was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3) on 1 September 1997.
3. The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 30 December 1999. His DD Form 2656 shows he is married. He placed an X in Block 28c indicating he elected to participate in the SBP for children only coverage. He placed an X in Block 29a indicating he elected coverage to be based on full gross retirement pay. His spouse signed the DD Form 2656 under Section VIII (Survivor Benefit Spousal Concurrence) to indicate that she concurred with the applicants decision to elect children only SBP coverage.
4. Block 29b (Level of Coverage) on the applicants DD Form 2656 contains the entry I elect coverage with a reduced base amount of $ __________.
5. The applicant retired on 1 April 2000 in the rank of CW3.
6. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
7. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant completed and signed a DD Form 2656 on 30 December 1999 and elected participation in the SBP for children only coverage. He marked Block 29a on the DD Form 2656 for full gross pay coverage. His spouse concurred with his decision and she signed under Section VIII.
2. Aside from his own assertions, there is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant was improperly briefed regarding SBP coverage. His DD Form 2656 clearly indicates in Block 29b that he could have elected SBP coverage with a reduced base amount. This block could have triggered any questions he may have had concerning costs or types of election options available to him. Therefore, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicants request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
x_____ x______ x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
x_________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20060014989
SUFFIX
RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Mr. Schwartz
ISSUES 1.
137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006454
The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Level of Coverage) of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), to show Coverage with a Reduced Base Amount of $635.00 instead of Coverage Based on the Threshold Amount in Effect on the Date of Retirement. 2. The applicant states that he and his spouse elected coverage with a reduced base amount of $635.00 in Item 27 of his DD Form 2656, which was the minimum threshold amount in effect at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014083
The applicant states although she elected "threshold amount" level of SBP coverage on the DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) she completed in conjunction with her 19 July 2009 retirement, because the date her spouse signed the form was prior to the date she signed the form, her SBP level of coverage was established based on her full gross pay. The applicant contacted DFAS and was informed the SBP level of coverage election of full pay was the result of her spouse signing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015165
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015165 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He sent a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) to the retired pay services in July 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by: a. showing his spouse signed and dated the DD Form 2656 on 28 January 2009 electing to participate in the SBP for children only coverage, b. showing that DFAS...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018353
Section XI (Certification) item 30 (Member) states, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1-year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. He provided a DD Form 2656-2 requesting termination of his SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse/children based on the full amount in the presence of an RSO counselor.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008007
His pay records also show he paid SBP premiums throughout the years based on his SBP election of the reduced amount. His 10 September 2009 retiree account statement shows spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount. His pay records show he paid SBP premiums from 1985 to 2006 based on this reduced amount.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019212
The applicant states: * Army regulations in effect at the time the FSM submitted his retired pay application required the submission of a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) * After an exhaustive search with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised her that they could not find this document * She was never counseled or provided any documentation to sign for or notarize to relinquish of the SBP * She was married to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015698
A signed/notarized statement from his spouse, Nicole, wherein she states she concurs with the termination of SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows, prior to his retirement, the applicant made a spouse SBP election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 on 21 February 2012, electing not to participate in the SBP, and that his spouse properly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014732
In section IX (SBP Election) of this form, the applicant checked that he elected coverage for spouse only, based on full gross pay. There is no evidence of record and he does not provide any evidence to show that he completed a new DD Form 2656 prior to his retirement date. DFAS indicated the applicant requested termination of his SBP coverage in October 2009.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002610
The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse-only coverage. The applicant states: * an invalid election was made * she was shocked when the FSM's retirement pay was stopped after his death * entries on the FSM's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) are unclear and a determination should not have been made * the mistake would have been caught had the FSM listed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004344
The applicant, the spouse of a retired service member (SM), requests correction of the SM's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for children only instead of coverage for spouse and children. The applicant provides a DA Form 7652, dated 21 October 2010, in which the SM's commander recommended the SM not be retained in the military. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of the...