Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014576C071029
Original file (20060014576C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 April 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060014576


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz            |     |Acting Director      |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. David K. Haasenritter         |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. John G. Heck                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he
completed  20 years of active duty.

2.  The applicant states that at the time he was placed on the Temporary
Disability Retired List (TDRL) he was just one month short of completing 20
years of service, thus disqualifying him from receiving concurrent receipt
of retired pay (i.e., retired pay and Department of Veterans Affairs
disability compensation).  He had every intention of completing 20 years.
He was not permitted to take his remaining leave time of 38 days.  He
believes he falls under the temporary retirement category for consideration
of concurrent receipt.  He was advised that his temporary retirement orders
would extend his time past the 20-year minimum; however, he has received no
updated finalized orders that should have confirmed his official retirement
at least met the 20-year minimum.

3.  The applicant provides his TDRL orders; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 February
1997; and his leave and earnings statement (LES) for the period 1 through
19 February 1997.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which
occurred on 19 February 1997.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 3 October 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular
Army on 29 March 1977.  He served in Southwest Asia during the Persian Gulf
War from 22 October 1990 through 26 July 1991.  He was promoted to Sergeant
First Class, E-7 on 1 July 1996 in military occupational specialty 76J
(Medical Supply Noncommissioned Officer).

4.  On 10 October 1996, a Medical Evaluation Board referred the applicant
to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for diagnoses of mild pulmonary
hypertension, hypertension, and pulmonary fibrosis.

5.  On 27 October 1996, a PEB found the applicant to be unfit by reason of
pulmonary fibrosis.  The PEB recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a
100 percent disability rating.  On 1 November 1996, the applicant waived a
formal hearing of his case and concurred with the findings and
recommendation.

6.  On 19 February 1997, the applicant was released from active duty after
completing a 19 years, 10 months, and 21 days of creditable active service
and was placed on the TDRL the following date.  His LES for the period 1
through    19 February 1997 shows he had 38 days of earned leave to his
credit and was paid for 30 days of unused leave (with a career total of 60
days of paid leave).

7.  On 30 September 1998, a TDRL PEB found the applicant to be unfit due to
pulmonary fibrosis and recommended his permanent disability retirement with
a 100 percent disability rating.

8.  Orders dated 19 October 1998 removed the applicant from the TDRL
effective 19 October 1998 and permanently retired him the next day.

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement,
or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who
may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical
disability.  It states a Soldier may not be retained or separated solely to
increase retirement or separation benefits.

10.  The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 granted a
special payment to certain disabled retirees - Combat Related Special
Compensation (CRSC).  CRSC is payable to certain disabled retirees who have
at least 20 years of active duty or a combination of active duty and
Reserve points equaling 20 years of full-time active duty.  Those retired
for disability must still have completed at least 20 years of service in
order to meet the length-of-service requirements.  Compensation is paid for
combat-related disabilities, i.e., those incurred in combat, in a training
exercise, or in the performance of hazardous duty.  Members retired under
the temporary early retirement authority are not eligible unless the member
has been recalled to active duty long enough to accumulate 20 years or more
of service.

11.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1202 provides that if a member would be
qualified for retirement for disability but for the fact his disability is
not determined to be of a permanent nature and stable, the Secretary shall,
if he also determines that accepted medical principles indicate the
disability may be of a permanent nature, place the member's name on the
TDRL with retired pay computed under section 1401 of this title.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is acknowledged that the applicant may have had every intention of
completing 20 years of service.  Unfortunately, he developed a medical
condition that necessitated his medical retirement 39 days prior to his
completing 20 years of active duty.  A Soldier may not be retained or
separated solely to increase retirement or separation benefits.

2.  It is noted that the applicant had 38 days of earned leave at the time
he was placed on the TDRL.  The evidence of record shows he was paid for 30
of those days.  It cannot be determined from the available evidence if he
requested payment rather than the opportunity to take that leave.  Even if
he had taken that leave prior to being medically retired, however, he still
would have been retired one day short of completing 20 years of active
duty.

3.  There is no available evidence to show the applicant would have been
eligible for early retirement.  Even if he had been retired under the early
retirement authority, members retired under the temporary early retirement
authority are not eligible for CRSC unless they are later recalled to
active duty long enough to accumulate 20 years or more of service.

4.  When the applicant was placed on the TDRL on 20 February 1997, he was
retired.  The only thing the orders dated 19 October 1998 did was remove
him from the TDRL and permanently retire him.  The removal from the TDRL
and permanent retirement did not change his retirement date.  A copy of the
orders removing him from the TDRL will be provided to him.

5.  The CRSC was enacted into law in Fiscal Year 2003.  The applicant
retired for physical disability in February 1997.  The fact the CRSC was
enacted six years after he retired is an insufficient basis on which to
grant the relief requested.

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 19 February 1997; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on   18 February 2000.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jns___  __dkh___  __jgh___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  __John N. Slone_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060014576                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070419                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schwartz                            |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.01                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |

-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014768

    Original file (20120014768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 March 2012, a TDRL PEB convened and found his condition continued since being placed on the TDRL. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving. CRSC determinations require evidence of a direct, causal relationship to the military retiree’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00460

    Original file (PD 2012 00460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating for SVC syndrome secondary to fibrosing mediastinitis. RATING COMPARISON: Service FPEB – Dated 20030729 VA *– All Effective Date 20030924 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam SVC Syndrome, Secondary to Fibrosing Mediastinitis 7199-7120 10% Fibrosing Mediastinitis with DVT and S/P stenting of SVC and R/Main PA 6899-6817 60% *STR Combined: 10% Combined: 60% *No C&P Exam’s in Record ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board noted that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023001

    Original file (20100023001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his permanent physical disability be removed from his military records and that he be granted a 20-year retirement. (2) Paragraph 7-4 states that a Soldier will be removed from the TDRL and separated with severance pay if the Soldier has less than 20 years of service and is unfit because of the disability for which the Soldier was placed on the TDRL and either the disability has stabilized at less than 30 percent or the disability, although not stabilized, has...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01142

    Original file (PD 2012 01142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Following later re- evaluation, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis following treatment of Stage III-B Hodgkin’s disease as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). At the TDRL re-evaluation exam, the CI reported that there had been improvement in her chest pain but she still had DOE with some activities. Rating criteria for 6830 (radiation induced pulmonary pneumonitis and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064662C070421

    Original file (2001064662C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he did not enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that all premiums deducted from his retired pay be refunded. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It would be equitable to show that the applicant terminated his enrollment in the SBP effective 1 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003967

    Original file (20110003967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states they petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) but they were told to contact the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA). His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary physical disability. If this fails, and the Soldier does not undergo a physical examination, the USAPDA will administratively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008838

    Original file (20100008838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Review the characterization of change of service to honorable conditions under full medical discharge under conditions by releasing me from Temporary Duty Retired List and properly placing me on the Permanent Retired List of 30 years of active duty service." The commander recommended the applicant's processing and separation through the U.S. Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). Therefore, she could not have been placed on the TDRL or the Retired List in the grade of master sergeant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010771

    Original file (20110010771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the decision to deny him combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 6 July 2010, he filed a claim for CRSC based on his VA rating of 100-percent for depressive disorder. The applicant also provides a VA Rating Decision, dated 11 March 2004, wherein his service-connected disability of depressive disorder and PTSD, rated at 100-percent disabling, was considered permanent and total.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008351

    Original file (20080008351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The evidence or record also shows that the PEB considered the applicant’s medical conditions described in his medical records and the evidence presented at that time. Based on a review of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014647C071029

    Original file (20060014647C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her disability retirement of 29 April 1997 be changed to show she was instead retired under Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) in effect at the time. The applicant's contentions that she is entitled to have her disability retirement changed to a TERA retirement under the most favorable pay provisions of the law (10 USC 1401b) and the discharge review standards established in DODI 1332.28, as codified in Army Regulation 15-180, were carefully...