Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012326
Original file (20060012326.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060012326 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Linda D. Simmons 

Chairperson

Mr. John T. Meixell

Member

Mr. Ronald S. Venable

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the appropriate campaign badge that she is entitled to based on her service during the Gulf War Era.

2.  The applicant states that she was not aware that she was entitled to a campaign badge until it was brought to her attention by another Soldier.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 11 February 1991, the date her discharge.  The application submitted in this case is dated 25 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 April 1982 and entered active duty on 27 February 1986.  Records also show the applicant served in Germany during the period 26 May 1986 to
11 February 1991.  She was honorably discharged in the rank of specialist/pay grade E-4 by reason of pregnancy on 11 February 1991.

4.  Block 12f (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry 
"4 years, 8 months, and 15 days."

5.  Block 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, Army Achievement Medal, NCO Professional Development Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Good Conduct Medal, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).  

6.  There are no orders in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded a campaign badge for her military service during the Gulf War Era.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for announcement of awards.  Specifically, this regulations states in paragraph 1-26 that permanent awards of badges, except basic marksmanship qualification badges, identification badges, and the Physical Fitness Badge will be announced in permanent orders by commanders authorized to make the award or permanent orders of Headquarters, Department of the Army. .

8.  Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on her DD Form 214.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that she is entitled to a campaign badge based on her service during the Gulf War Era was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.  There is insufficient evidence in the available records to show that she is entitled to a campaign badge based on her military service.

2.  Records show that the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show this award.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 11 February 1991; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 10 February 1994.   The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

4.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the Board Determination/Recommendation section below.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JTM__  __LDS___  __RSV__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for award of a campaign badge to individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the National Defense Service Medal.




_Linda D. Simmons_____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001476C070206

    Original file (20050001476C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Achievement Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a second award of the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001476C070206

    Original file (20050001476C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Army Achievement Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded a second award of the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008097C070208

    Original file (20040008097C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Lawrence Foster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A Purple Heart certificate, dated 28 February 1991, indicates the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing she was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 28 February 1991, the Kuwait Liberation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004381C070206

    Original file (20050004381C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    As new issues, she also requests an additional Purple Heart, the "Meritorious Medal with Bronze Star" (known as the Meritorious Service Medal (2nd award)), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd award), the Valorous Unit Award, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Overseas Service Ribbon (3rd Award), the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia), the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Iraq), the United Nations Medal, the Joint Service Achievement Medal, the Cold...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-185

    Original file (2008-185.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With regard to the applicant’s reference to a “veteran’s preference” under Public Law 105-85, CGPC stated that the applicant’s DD 214 clearly shows that she was on active duty from March 4, 1985, to January 3, 1991, which overlaps with the period August 2, 1990, to January 2, 1992. (1) states the following as the primary eligibility criterion for a National Defense Service Medal: Honorable active service as a member of the Armed Forces for any period (inclusive) from 27 June 1950 to 28 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007876

    Original file (20140007876.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Although she entered active duty prior to 30 June 1985, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that she contributed any money towards a post–Vietnam era VEAP. The applicant provides insufficient evidence for the Board to establish the correct entry.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020370

    Original file (20090020370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following awards: * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) with 2 bronze service stars * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Kuwait Liberation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004155

    Original file (20120004155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), paragraph 2-11, states applicants do not have a right to a formal hearing before the ABCMR. Records show the applicant met the qualifying period of service for the following awards and correction of her DD Form 214 to show these awards: * Southwest Asia Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) 4. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007119

    Original file (20100007119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge and all awards related to her service in Southwest Asia during the Gulf War. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show she was awarded the Combat Medical Badge. In the absence of evidence that she was personally present while the infantry unit was in contact with the enemy, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002153C070205

    Original file (20060002153C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002153 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the Army Honorable Service Lapel Button and the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 February 1989 to 26 February 1992. As a result, the Board recommends...