RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 November 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012156
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Robert W. Soniak | |Member |
| |Mr. David W. Tucker | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration for chief
warrant officer five (CW5) due to material error in his promotion
consideration file.
2. The applicant states, that he was not selected for promotion to CW5 by
the 2006 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) due to material error.
He also states that his promotion consideration file did not contain his
officer evaluation reports (OER) for the periods 1 January 2004 to 7 August
2004 and 8 August 2004 to 8 September 2005, which included his rated
service as unit commander of the 175th Quartermaster Company, his
deployment to Kuwait in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and his
Meritorious Service Medal.
3. The applicant states he provided copies of the OERs for the periods
ending
7 August 2004 and 8 September 2005, and an award of the Meritorious Service
Medal, in support of his request; however, they were not provided to the
Board with his application. His application was processed through the
Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command (HRC),
St. Louis, Missouri, and it appears that this office retained the
abovementioned documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based upon a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, HRC, St. Louis, it was determined that
the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained
material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to
CW5 by the 2004, 2005, and 2006 RCSBs. His OERs for the periods ending
31 December 2003, 8 August 2004, and 30 May 2005, were not seen by the
board.
2. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion consideration or
reconsideration by a special selection board may only be based on
erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record
at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for
promotion to CW5 by the 2004, 2005, and 2006 RCSBs and should now be
submitted for appropriate special selection board consideration for this
purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
__ JCR___ ___DWT_ _RWS_ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_______ ___DWT __RWS__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by placing the officer evaluation reports for the periods ending
31 December 2003, 8 August 2004, and 30 May 2005 in the OMPF of the
individual concerned.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his
records be submitted to duly constituted special selection boards, as
deemed appropriate for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer
five, under the 2004, 2005, and 2006 year criteria.
3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to chief warrant officer five on his date of eligibility, as
determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the criteria cited,
provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for
promotion.
4. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
_____Jeffrey C. Redmann__
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060012156 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20061116 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.00 |
|2. |131.10 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016141
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be considered for promotion to chief warrant officer five (CW5)/pay grade W-5, by a promotion advisory board under the 2008 CW5 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (DA RCSB) promotion criteria. The Chief, Special Actions, DA Promotions, stated that the applicant's board file was missing two OERs with through dates of 9 January 2006 and 15 April 2006, which should have been seen by the original selection board. The evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011579
The evidence shows the applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 30 August 1999. Based on the established zone of consideration for the 2002 RCSB and the applicant's date of rank for lieutenant colonel, he was not eligible for consideration for promotion to colonel by that board. He was considered and selected for promotion to colonel by a SSB that convened on 4 August 2006.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013271C080407
The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he was not selected for promotion to CW4 because several key documents were missing from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and the record reviewed by the Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) in March 2007. This official further states that based on these omissions, the applicant is eligible for promotion consideration by a DA Promotion Advisory Board (PAB), and it is recommended the applicant be granted PAB consideration under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000096C070206
The applicant requested promotion consideration to colonel by an SSB on 31 May 1994 and on 13 July 1994. In the processing of the applicant's original case, the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, USAHRC - STL advised the Army Review Board Agency – St. Louis that the applicant had a basis for consideration by an SSB [under the 1993 and 1994 criteria] because the OERs ending 1 May 1993 and 8 January 1994 were not seen by the promotion boards. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011681C070208
His records show he was considered and not selected for promotion to colonel by the 2000, 2001, and 2002 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). On 4 December 2002, he submitted a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) and requested reconsideration for promotion to colonel by a SSB based on the fact that his last 2 OER's and his Master's degree were omitted from the promotion package. On 23 December 2004, the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, St. Louis,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005260
The applicant requests, in effect, below the zone promotion consideration to major by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria and promotion to major effective as if he had been selected in 2007. The applicant states, in effect, he was not selected for below the zone promotion to major by the 2007 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB), because of an unjust officer evaluation report (OER) for the period 7 November 2005 to 30 April 2006. In accordance with regulatory...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001615C070205
The applicant request, in effect, promotion reconsideration to colonel, as an Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) officer, by a special selection board (SSB), under the 2005 year criteria. The applicant's military records show he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), as a second lieutenant, effective 11 December 1981. The Board also concludes that the applicant did not present convincing evidence of a material error in his file at the time he was not selected for promotion by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010374C070208
The applicant's Officer Record Brief shows he was assigned with the 343rd Support Center, Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) from 28 March 1994 to 1 December 1996, and he was promoted to major/O-5 (MAJ/O-5) on 22 June 1995. On 17 May 2004, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, informed the applicant that a Special Selection Board (SSB) convened to consider him for promotion to LTC under the 2002 criteria; however, he was again not selected for promotion, which confirmed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019264
The applicant requests, in effect, that she be reconsidered for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Five (CW5) by a Special Selection Board (SSB). Therefore, it would be appropriate to have the applicant's record placed before an SSB for consideration for promotion under the criteria of the FY2008 CW5 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting her records to a duly constituted SSB for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017285
The applicant's record further shows that he was selected for promotion to MAJ by a RCSB, and that the promotion list was approved on 7 June 2006. He further states that the applicant was promoted based on the date he was placed in the higher grade position as an IMA officer on 28 August 2006, and was given this date as a DOR. He states that had the form been submitted through the Special Forces Career Manager's Office, and that office had submitted the form to his office, the 180 day...