Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011860
Original file (20060011860.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  15 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011860 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Margaret K. Patterson  

Chairperson

Mr. Larry W. Racster  

Member

Mr. Rodney E. Barber

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show the name L***y J*e A***s instead of J*e D****y A***s.

2.  The applicant states that his name was changed and that he has previously requested that his records be corrected.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a State of Louisiana Amended Birth Certificate and a copy of his driver's license in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 12 September 1969, the date of his transfer to the United States Army Reserve.  The application submitted in this case is dated 15 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records show that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 September 1966 for a period of three years.  The DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record-Armed Forces of the United States) shows the applicant's name as J*e D****y A***s.  The applicant initialed the form in several places using the initials "JDA" and he authenticated the form with the signature J*e D****y A***s.

4.  There is no indication in any of the applicant's official military records that he served under the name L***y J*e A***s.

5.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows that the applicant was identified as J*e D****y A***s and authenticated the form using the signature J*e D****y A***s.

6.  The applicant submitted a copy of his amended birth certificate which shows that his full name was corrected from J*e D****y A***s  to L***y J*e A***s on 20 September 2001.
7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management
/Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Chapter 2 of this regulation states an OMPF is initiated when the Soldier becomes a member of any Army Component.  It further states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

11.  The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show he served his term of service under the name L***y J*e A***s.

2.  Evidence shows he was enlisted and served under the name, J*e D****y A***s.  The applicant's amended birth certificate shows that his name was changed from J*e D****y A***s to L***y J*e A***s, however, this document was not prepared until after his military service.  Therefore, the Army records are consistent with the applicant's name at that time.

3.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  

4.  In the absence of compelling information to the contrary, there is no basis for changing the records in this case.  

5.  A copy of this decisional document, along with his application, which confirms his birth name, will be filed in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the different names, and adequately document his name in his record for the purpose of entitlement to veterans' benefits.  

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 12 September 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
11 September 1972.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LWR__  _MKP__  __REB___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__M. K. Patterson___
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016080

    Original file (20070016080.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of Item 1 (Name) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 17 September 1981 to show his first name is W_ _ _ _ _ instead of F_ _ _ _. The applicant’s records show that he used the first name F_ _ _ _ in all military documents and records throughout his military service. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted and served using the first name of F_ _ _ _ throughout his military career.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015060

    Original file (20060015060.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show the name G*****o C*****o-V*****z instead of P***o C*****o-V*****z. The birth certificate provided by the applicant shows the name G*****o C*****o-V*****z, however, this document cannot be validated and is insufficient to amend the applicant's military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075859C070403

    Original file (2002075859C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: However, the Board finds insufficient available evidence to support this claim, or to show that the applicant has or would suffer an injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining its records with the last name under which he served.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000123C070206

    Original file (20050000123C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is not interested in changing the name and gender throughout the military record, only on the subject DD Form 214. Therefore, as a matter of compassion, it would be appropriate to issue a Transcript of Military Record (DA Form 1569), under the applicant's current legal female name, showing the applicant's honorable active duty service from 29 April 1965 through 18 January 1968 and from 19 January 1968 through 13 May 1970. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005033C071108

    Original file (20070005033C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jerome L. Pionk | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Enlistment Record records his last name as B****n***l. A review of the available military records, show the FSM’s last name as B***n***l. The FSM signed his name using B***n***l. 4. It is understandable that the applicant wants to have the name recorded in his late fathers military records changed to reflect the FSM’s name that is shown on his amended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013404

    Original file (20070013404.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 5 of the DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of her separation shows her date of birth as 5 October 1987. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Therefore, in view of the evidence provided, the applicant is entitled to correction of her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014361

    Original file (20070014361.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his last name as J_ _ _ _ _ _ instead of S_ _ _ _ _ _. The applicant’s records show that he used the last name S_ _ _ _ _ _ on all of his military documents and records throughout his military service. The applicant requests his service records be corrected to change his last name to J_ _ _ _ _ _.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003112C070206

    Original file (20050003112C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter, dated 23 August 2005, from the SSA confirmed that during the applicant's period of military service the SSA's records show the applicant's last name as W-----y and his SSN as ***-38-****. However, there is no evidence that shows the applicant ever used the last name of P---e while in the military service. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 May 1963, the date of his discharge; therefore, the time for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099589C070212

    Original file (03099589C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the erroneous National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), currently in his OMPF (Official Military Personnel File), be replaced by the correct form which was published by the Mississippi National Guard. However, the original NGB Form 22 was filed in his OMPF. The NGB Form 22, contained in the applicant’s OMPF, indicates that he was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard on 9 May 1996 to accept appointment as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058295C070421

    Original file (2001058295C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: