Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011832
Original file (20060011832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  8 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011832 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement in the US Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states her discharge was an error; other Soldiers without family care plans were retained.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty).

	b.  An 8 August 2006 letter to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR for 8 years on 6 February 2001.  At the time of her enlistment, she stated she was single with no dependents.  Some time following her enlistment she had a baby.

2.  Army Regulation (AR) 600-20 (Army Command Policy) prescribes the policies and responsibilities of command, which include the well-being of the force, military discipline and conduct, the Army Equal Opportunity Program, and the Army Sexual Assault Victim Program.  It provides, in part, for the establishment of The Family Care Plan to ensure family members are properly and adequately cared for when the Soldier is deployed, on temporary duty (TDY), at Annual Training, or otherwise not available due to military requirements.

3.  The applicant established a Family Care Plan to provide for her infant baby in event she was called to active duty and deployed.

4.  On 7 December 2003, the applicant's unit was mobilized and she was ordered to active duty.  At that time, her Family Care Plan proved ineffective and there was no one to take care of her child.  On 26 January 2004, she voluntarily, in writing, requested separation under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for parenthood.  Her request was approved and the approving authority directed an Honorable Discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for parenthood.  The approving authority directed the applicant not be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), per paragraph 1-36, AR 635-200.

5.  On 20 February 2004, the applicant was honorably discharged.  She has had no affiliation with the Army since her discharge.

6.  AR 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-8 provides for separation when parenthood interferes with worldwide deployment.  Chapter 1-36 states Soldiers with a remaining military service obligation (MSO) are ineligible for transfer to the IRR when released by reason of parenthood.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant voluntarily sought separation by reason of parenthood.  her request was granted and, under the provisions of AR 635-200, she was properly denied transfer to the IRR.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wfc___  __eem___  __rmn___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



							William F. Crain
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011832
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070308
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
110.0300
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012476

    Original file (20140012476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Program – U.S. Army Delayed Entry Program) shows: * she enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) * she enlisted under the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (Reduced Military Service Obligation (MSO) Enlistment Bonus 3 Years Active and 3 Years Selected Reserve) * she was authorized an enlistment bonus in the amount of $30,000 2. Enlistment bonuses for RA Soldiers are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013889

    Original file (20140013889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 November 1990, the applicant requested separation from the U.S. Army under paragraph 5-8, Army Regulation 635-200. On 14 December 1990, consistent with the recommendations of the applicant's chain of command, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for the inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood with an honorable characterization of service. Every case is individually decided based upon...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150002814

    Original file (AR20150002814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows on 17 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, for failing to implement and maintain an adequate family care plan, with an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089016C070403

    Original file (2003089016C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 11 May 1994, the applicant submitted a request for a chapter 6, hardship discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that she was released from active duty on 3 June 1994 under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 6-3b(2) and her service was characterized as honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003013

    Original file (20120003013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The MFR cited provisions contained in Army Regulation 600-20 (Army Command Policy), paragraph 5-5 (Family Care Plan), and Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-8 (Involuntary separation due to parenthood). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that her RA reenlistment bonus...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007030

    Original file (AR20130007030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007030 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Discharge received:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021494

    Original file (20090021494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of her general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 31 August 2007, the applicant was counseled on her failure to submit an adequate FCP and informed that her chain of command was initiating separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-8 (Involuntary Separation Due to Parenthood). The applicant's request to upgrade her general discharge to an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006228

    Original file (AR20120006228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a fully honorable discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board that relief be denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026003

    Original file (20100026003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the applicant's stated intent not to comply with the requirement to complete an FCP, his company commander counseled him on the possibility he could be involuntarily separated in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-8 for parenthood. On 3 September 2009, the approving authority approved the request and directed the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004518

    Original file (20130004518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 26 (Separation Code) something other than LDG * item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) something other than 3 2. She waived additional time to complete her family care plan and acknowledged she understood that her separation under Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-8 (Involuntary separation for parenthood) would be initiated. ...