Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011404
Original file (20060011404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011404 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Ms. Wanda L. Waller

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Ted Kanamine

Chairperson

Mr. Larry Bergquist

Member

Ms. LaVerne Douglas

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her Reentry (RE) code be changed.  

2.  The applicant states that she is requesting an RE code that will allow her to rejoin the military.  She contends that she was discharged for not providing an adequate family care plan to her unit within 30 days.  She states that she is now able to provide a long term and short term provider for her child in the event that she returns to the military.  She also states that she invested seven years in the military and would like the chance to retire.   

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 2 August 2005.  The application submitted in this case is dated
31 July 2006.

2.  The applicant enlisted on 25 June 1998 and trained as an automated logistics specialist.  She attained the rank of sergeant.  On 2 August 2005, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, for parenthood.

3.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry, "AR [Army Regulation] 635-200, PARA [paragraph] 5-8."  Item 26 (Separation Code) on her DD Form 214 shows the entry, "JDG."  Item 27 (Reentry Code) on her DD Form 214 shows the entry, "3."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on her DD Form 214 shows the entry, "PARENTHOOD." 

4.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JDG” is “Parenthood” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8.  

5.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, 


policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the 
U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

6.  RE-3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable.

7.  RE-1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

8.  The Separation Program Designator Code/Reentry Code Cross Reference Table, dated 31 March 2003, shows that SPD [Separation Program Designator] "JDG" will be issued an RE code of 3.   

9.  Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria.  They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of her separation.  

2.  Since the applicant’s disqualification is waivable, she has the option of visiting her local recruiting station and consulting with recruiting personnel who are required to process a waiver request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

TK_____  __LB____  _LD_____  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


____Ted Kanamine______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011404
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070227
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0300
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002581

    Original file (20120002581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4" to a code of "3." Records show the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, by reason of "Parenthood," and correctly assigned the SPD code of "JDG." Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and they may also process RE code waivers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018000

    Original file (20090018000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 4 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090018000 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 5 February 2009, she requested waiver of the 30 days and requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-8 (involuntary separation due to parenthood). Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003081C070206

    Original file (20050003081C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Della R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes), then in effect, prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014292

    Original file (20100014292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, his current RE code of RE-3 should be changed to RE-2 to show he was qualified for enlistment/reenlistment in accordance with Army Regulation 600-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 5. They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210. The evidence of record confirms that his separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, to include...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017558

    Original file (20080017558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her records be corrected by upgrading her reentry code (RE Code) from RE-3 to RE-1 so she may reenter military service. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated for this reason. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008734C080213

    Original file (20070008734C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    She is currently trying to go in under another branch of Service and is not able to do so due to those codes. On or about 14 March 2006, the applicant’s commander initiated involuntary separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8 due to parenthood due to the applicant’s failure to maintain a valid Family Care Plan. Item 26 of her DD Form 214 shows she was given a separation code of “JDG” (involuntary discharge under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008450

    Original file (20120008450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table indicates that an RE code of 3 was the proper code to assign members separated with an SPD code of JDG at the time of the applicant's discharge. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030167

    Original file (20100030167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The SPD code of JDG applies to Soldiers separated for parenthood. The available evidence shows the applicant was separated for parenthood.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011114

    Original file (20120011114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 June 2005, her commander notified her that action was being initiated to involuntarily separate her under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) due to parenthood. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. As such, there is no evidence of an error in assignment of her reason for separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009974

    Original file (20100009974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Table 3-1 includes a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified...