Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011369
Original file (20060011369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  13 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011369 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Ms. Wanda L. Waller

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. William Powers

Chairperson

Mr. Paul Smith

Member

Mr. Jerome Pionk

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 3 (Grade) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) be corrected to show technician four instead of technician five.

2.  The applicant states that his pay grade was technician four not technician five. He contends that he served in a time of war and making rank was not only hard but a privilege.

3.  The applicant provides a photograph of a Soldier in uniform and a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 13 October 1945.  The application submitted in this case is dated 31 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

4.  The applicant was inducted on 17 October 1941.  He served in the European Theater of Operations from 17 August 1942 through 17 September 1945 and was honorably discharged on 13 October 1945.

5.  Item 3 on the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the entry, "TEC [technician] 5."  Item 38 (Highest Grade Held) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the entry, "TEC 4.”     

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided a photograph of a Soldier in uniform apparently wearing the rank of technician four.

7.  A review of the enlisted rank/pay grade structure of the Army between 1 July 1920 and 31 July 1948, shows that the three lowest pay grades (grade 7 through grade 5) essentially consisted of a private (grade 7); private first class (grade 6); and corporal/technician five (grade 5); grade 4 personnel carried the rank title of sergeant/technician four; grade 3 personnel carried the rank title of staff sergeant or technician three.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was a technician five at the time of his discharge on 13 October 1945.  Item 38 on the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his highest grade held was technician four and the applicant provided a photograph of a Soldier in uniform wearing the rank of technician four. The applicant may have been administratively reduced to technician five at some point prior to his discharge.  Such a reduction would not have been a reflection on his service, merely an indication of an administrative necessity.  As there is no evidence to show exactly what happened in the applicant’s case, it is presumed he was a technician five at the time of his separation.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 3 on his WD AGO Form 53-55.

2.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 13 October 1945; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950 
(3 years after the Board was established on 2 January 1947).  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

WP_____  __PS____  __JP____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



___William Powers_____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011369
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070313
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011335

    Original file (20120011335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable) to show his grade as Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt) instead of "PFC" (Private First Class). All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only seven rank insignias and seven pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade (highest) to 7th Grade (lowest). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017339

    Original file (20130017339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show the rank of corporal (CPL) instead of the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he held the rank of PFC at the time of separation and the highest rank he held while on active duty was CPL.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011089C070208

    Original file (20040011089C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM’s WD AGO Form 100 indicates that he held the rank of PFC at the time he was separated. The policy in effect at the time provided for entering the rank a member held on the date of separation in Item 3 and the highest rank a member held in Item 38 of the WD AGO Form 53-55.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004484C070208

    Original file (20040004484C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected to show his rank as Technician Five (Tec 5). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The last official documents prepared on the applicant during his separation processing, which include his WD AGO Form 53-55 and WD AGO Form 100, both confirm he held the rank of Tec 4 on the date of his separation from active duty, and that this was the highest rank he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066388C070402

    Original file (2002066388C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), military occupational assignments section, shows in item 10 (months) the entry "24", in item 11 (Grade) the entry "Tec 5" (Technician 5th Grade/Grade 5) and in item 12 (military occupational specialty (MOS)) the entry "Artillery Mechanic Heavy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083888C070212

    Original file (2003083888C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank of technician 5 th Grade (Tec 5). The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his military records be corrected to show the rank of Tec 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013116

    Original file (20100013116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his last name be corrected in item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation); his grade be corrected to show technician fourth grade instead of private in item 3 (Grade); and item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) be corrected to show a marksmanship badge for the .50 caliber machine gun. His WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was a private at the time of his discharge on 30 November 1945. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011640

    Original file (20100011640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant held the grade of technician third grade temporarily or was promoted to technician third grade prior to his discharge on 5 November 1945. However, his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was a technician fifth grade at the time of his discharge on 5 November 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021730

    Original file (20120021730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) vice private first class (PFC) * award of the Bronze Star Medal 2. The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Unfortunately, there are no orders in his reconstructed record that show he was promoted or appointed to SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019668

    Original file (20140019668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his grade be changed to technician 4 (TEC 4)/grade 4 instead of TEC 5/grade 5 on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge) with a date of separation of 16 August 1946. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140019668 3 ARMY BOARD FOR...