Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011146
Original file (20060011146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  1 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060011146 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.



	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show "Combat Medical Badge” versus “Medical Badge.”

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that this award was incorrectly annotated on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 16 September 1966, the date of his release from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 17 May 2006, but received on
7 August 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 3 October 1963, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of three years.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).  

4.  The applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 12 May 1965 through 
12 September 1966.  He performed duties as a medical specialist and ambulance driver with Company B, 173rd Support Battalion (Airborne).

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was awarded the "Medical Badge" by Special Orders 169, Headquarters, 
173rd Airborne Brigade (Separate).  The award order was not available in the official record.
 
6.  Review of the applicant's record indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows a unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971.

8.  The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  However, his DD Form 214 does not show any bronze service stars indicating campaign credit.  His records indicate he participated in the Vietnam Offensive, the Vietnam Counteroffensive, and the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II campaigns.   

9.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows a unit to which the applicant was assigned (Company B, 173rd Support Battalion) was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 5 May 1965 -4 May 1967, by Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1968.

11.  The applicant's records show that he received ratings of excellent in conduct and efficiency.  There is no evidence the applicant was disqualified for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

12.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.


13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant performed duties as a medical specialist in the Republic of Vietnam from 12 May 1965 through 12 September 1966 with the 173rd Support Battalion (Airborne).  His DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the "Medical Badge" by HQ, 173rd Support Battalion (Separate) by Special Orders.  Although his record does not specifically state he was awarded the "Combat Medical Badge," given that this he was awarded this badge during his tenure in the Republic of Vietnam, the Board determined there is sufficient evidence to support that the applicant was awarded the "Combat Medical Badge."  Therefore, he is entitled to have his record changed to show this award. 

2.  General Orders awarded the applicant's unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross With Palm Unit Citation which is not shown on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this foreign unit award.

3.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of three bronze service stars to be affixed on his Vietnam Service Medal. 

4.  General Orders awarded the applicant's unit the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 5 May 1965 – 4 May 1967.  Therefore, he is entitled to have his record corrected to show this award.

5.  The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal.  There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 3 October 1963 through 16 September 1966 and to correction of his records to show the award of the Good Conduct Medal (First Award).


6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 16 September 1966; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
15 September 1969.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

__tmr___  __jcr___  __jrh___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

a.  deleting "Medical Badge" and adding "Combat Medical Badge;"

b.  awarding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; 

	c.  awarding the Meritorious Unit Commendation; 

	d.  awarding three bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal; and

	e.  awarding the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the qualifying period of service from 3 October 1963 through 16 September 1966. 


					Thomas M. Ray
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060011146
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070301
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
107.0113
2.
107.0094
3.
107.0034
4.
107.0056
5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001659306C070421

    Original file (2001659306C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. He states the awards “were deleted” from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His honorable service also entitles him to a National Defense Service Medal and his record should be corrected accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013510

    Original file (20100013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state he contacted the Military Awards Branch and was made aware that no record of his submission for the Purple Heart was recorded and he would like to correct this oversight. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076689C070215

    Original file (2002076689C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-15b provides that requests for reconsideration, which are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case will be considered only if the staff of the Board determines that substantial relevant new evidence shows fraud, mistake of law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or that there is substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009671

    Original file (20100009671.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following information: * separation as a sergeant (E-5) * conversion in 1965 of the MOS 111.07 to the new MOS designation of 11B1P (Light Weapons Infantryman - Parachute qualified) * foreign service in Okinawa from 19 November 1963 through 4 May 1965 with assignment to Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment * award of the Parachutist Badge, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam), and the Marksman Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088371C070403

    Original file (2003088371C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22, section I provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009929

    Original file (20110009929.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 10 December 1963 through 9 December 1966 and he met the eligibility criteria for the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 10 December 1966 through 9 December 1969. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008723

    Original file (20090008723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), Combat Infantryman Badge, Parachutist Badge, Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, Aircraft Crewman's Badge, and three overseas service bars. Concerning his service with the 173rd Airborne Brigade, that service is shown in the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003557

    Original file (20120003557.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * completion of 2 years of foreign service in Vietnam * award of the Senior Parachutist Badge * award of four overseas service bars 2. * item 22c of his DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he completed 11 months and 14 days of foreign service in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) * item 24 his DD Form 214 for this period of service shows: * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018549

    Original file (20070018549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 12 May 1965 to 14 May 1966; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal; additionally, records show the applicant participated in two campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018289

    Original file (20080018289.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge with two other medical specialists while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, but it is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that, in addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the...