Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010995
Original file (20060010995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  13 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010995 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Ms. Wanda L. Waller

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Hubert Fry

Chairperson

Mr. William Crain

Member

Mr. Dale DeBruler

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his retired rank and pay grade as Sergeant First Class (SFC/E-7).  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he retired on 31 December 1953 in pay grade E-7 and that his rank was changed to Staff Sergeant/E-6 without an explanation.  He also states that he served as a platoon sergeant for three months.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States); a DA AGO Form 494 (Retirement Certificate); and a letter, dated 19 January 1984, from the Veterans Administration. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 31 December 1953.  The application submitted in this case is dated 26 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Having prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1951.  He was promoted to the temporary rank of SFC/E-6 on 28 April 1953.    

4.  On 31 December 1953, the applicant was permanently retired by reason of physical disability in the temporary rank of SFC/E-6.

5.  The enlisted grade structure of the Army on 21 January 1951 was as follows:

	Pay Grade E-7 - Master Sergeant
	Pay Grade E-6 - Sergeant First Class
	Pay Grade E-5 - Sergeant   
	Pay Grade E-4 - Corporal
	
	Pay Grade E-3 - Private First Class
Pay Grade E-2 - Private
Pay Grade E-1 - Private	
 
6.  On 1 June 1958, the top four enlisted grades were restructured as follows:

	Pay Grade E-9 - Sergeant Major
	Pay Grade E-8 - First Sergeant or Master Sergeant
	Pay Grade E-7 - Platoon Sergeant or Sergeant First Class    
	Pay Grade E-6 - Staff Sergeant 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At the time the applicant retired, the enlisted grade structure gave the rank title SFC for Soldiers in pay grade E-6.  The evidence of record shows that this was the rank and grade he held upon his retirement.  However, after he retired the enlisted grades were restructured and Soldiers in pay grade E-6 were titled Staff Sergeant and the rank title of SFC for Soldiers in pay grade E-6 ceased to exist.  The applicant’s retired rank is now properly titled Staff Sergeant.

2.  The applicant did retire while holding the rank title SFC.  However, due to automation systems (such as finance or identification card systems) that link the pay grade to the rank title these systems will automatically identify the applicant as a Staff Sergeant.  If the applicant is concerned about his identification card, he should ask his identification card issuing facility if they could/would manually enter his rank as SFC.  He should show them supporting documentation such as his DD Form 214 or this Board action so they may verify he retired as a SFC/E-6. The applicant’s finance records should be amended to show he holds the honorary rank of SFC/E-6.  
  
3.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 31 December 1953; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 30 December 1956.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

HF_____  _WC____  __DD____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

3.  The Board determined that an administrative error in the records of the individual concerned should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show he holds the honorary rank of SFC/E-6 and that a copy of this correction be provided to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center Retired Pay Operations.




___Hubert Fry____________
          CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010995
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070213
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0200
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008660

    Original file (20110008660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his records be corrected to show he retired in the rank title of sergeant first class. The evidence of record shows that this was the rank and grade he held upon his retirement. The applicant has provided no evidence that there is an error in his official record that can be corrected.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004539C070208

    Original file (20040004539C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004539 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was promoted to the rank of SFC with a corresponding pay grade of E-6 on 1 September 1951. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was REFRAD and placed on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007203

    Original file (20070007203.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show his rank, date of rank, and grade history as follows: a. Corporal (CPL), permanent grade (P), pay grade E-4 with a date of rank of 31 August 1950, in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army Enlistment Program); b. On 23 October 1967, the applicant signed a statement declining his recommendation for promotion to pay grade E-7 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-200 and stated that he was retiring and did not wish to have a two-year service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000694

    Original file (20140000694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he retired in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. These orders show the FSM's rank as M/Sgt and pay grade as E-7. The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM was promoted to the rank of M/Sgt in pay grade E-7 effective 11 September 1956.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000694

    Original file (20140000694 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he retired in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. These orders show the FSM's rank as M/Sgt and pay grade as E-7. The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM was promoted to the rank of M/Sgt in pay grade E-7 effective 11 September 1956.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016291

    Original file (20090016291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows his rank as Specialist 2 (T) [temporary] with a date of rank of 19 December 1955. A copy of a noncommissioned officer (NCO)/specialist program appointment letter, dated 13 March 1957, states the applicant's personnel records indicated he converted to a specialist status on or about 1 July 1955; however, there was no record of his acceptance or declination of the rank designation. The applicant also states that he does not know what rank a SP5 is.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001044

    Original file (20100001044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no available evidence to show he was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 prior to his 21 February 1960 or 10 April 1963 discharges from the USAR. Although the rank of SFC as pay grade E-7 was introduced into the Army grade structure on 1 June 1958, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence to confirm he was promoted to pay grade E-7 prior to his 1960 and 1963 discharges from the USAR. He was promoted to SSG/E-6 on 5 May 1979 and he was subsequently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005285

    Original file (20120005285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AGUZ Form 658 (Determination of Grade for Retirement, Advancement, Separation or Retirement Pay), dated 14 May 1974, shows the FSM was promoted to MSGT (E-7) on 24 January 1953 and reduced to SFC (E-6) on 16 December 1957 (per orders). Records show the FSM held the grade of E-6 when he was retired from active duty on 31 May 1964 and he was placed on the Retired List in that grade. Records show the FSM was advanced on the Retired List to the grade of SFC (E-7), effective 16 May 1974,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001064C070205

    Original file (20060001064C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains an Application for Retirement (DA Form 2339), dated 12 December 1963, which confirms that he requested voluntary retirement, in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, on 31 March 1964. Enclosed with this letter, is an extract of DA Special Orders Number 34, which authorized his retirement in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, and his placement on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 April 1964. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008733C070205

    Original file (20060008733C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM’s DD Form 214, dated 30 September 1955, shows his rank as "SFC" but his retired pay account statement shows "SSG." The FSM's Military records contain a copy of a DD Form 424 (Certification of Information for Retired Pay), dated 2 September 1955, which shows the rank and grade in which he retired was "SFC (E-6)."