Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010892
Original file (20060010892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  8 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010892 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Mr. John J. Wendland, Jr.

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. William F. Crain

Chairperson

Mr. Edward E. Montgomery

Member

Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge documents.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge documents indicate that his service was from 27 November 1945 to 7 May 1947; however, his actual dates of service were from 27 November 1944 to 7 May 1946.  The applicant also states that he has attempted several times to have the errors corrected, but just recently learned that he could apply to this Agency to have his records corrected.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), with an effective date of 7 May 1947 and Army of the United States Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated
7 May 1947.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on
7 May 1947, the date of his discharge from the Army.  The application submitted in this case is dated 25 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

4.  The applicant's military service records contain 2 War Department (WD) Forms 372A (Final Payment - Work Sheets), Disbursing Office (D.O.) Voucher Number 27923, Sub voucher number 34 (April 1947) and D.O. Voucher Number 29875, Sub voucher number 29 (May 1947).  These documents were prepared to document the applicant's pay and entitlements for the periods 1-31 March 1947, 1-30 April 1947, and 1-7 May 1947.  Both of the WD Forms 372A show in the block "Name of D.O." the stamped entry "J. M. B_______, Lt. Col. FD" and in the block "Honorable Discharge by Reason of" the authority is shown as Army Regulation 615-365, TWX [i.e., message] 85018, dated 8 November 1946.  The WD Form 372A, Voucher Number 29875, Sub voucher number 29 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was issued check number 48509 in the amount of $71.61.  The WD Form 372A, Voucher Number 27923, Sub voucher number 34 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was issued check number 27670 in the amount of $129.80 and cash in the amount of $100.00, for a total of $229.80. This WD Form 372A also shows the applicant placed his signature on the document acknowledging receipt of the monies.

5.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55, with an effective date of 7 May 1947 and Army of the United States Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 7 May 1947.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 shows in Item 23 (Date of Enlistment) the entry "27 NOV 45", in Item 24 (Date of Entry into Active Service) the entry "27 NOV 45", and in Item 7 (Date of Separation) the entry "7 May 1947."  Item 35 (Latest Immunization Dates) shows the applicant was immunized for Smallpox in December 1945, Typhoid in January 1946, and Tetanus in February 1946.  Item 36 (Service Outside Continental United States and Return) shows the applicant departed the United States on 29 August 1946 for service in the European Theater of Operations and returned to the United States on 10 April 1947.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows in Item 40 (Reason and Authority for Separation) the entry "CONV OF GOVT AR 615-365, 24 JAN 47 & TWX 85018 DTD 8 NOV 46." The WD AGO Form 53-55 further shows in the section for Pay Data, Item 47 (Total Amount, Name of Disbursing Officer) the entries "229.80"; "71.61"; and "JM B______
LT COL FD."  The applicant's Army of the United States Honorable Discharge Certificate shows that he was honorably discharged by the Separation Center at Fort Dix, New Jersey on 7 May 1947.

6.  War Department Technical Manual (TM) 12-235 (Enlisted Personnel - Discharge and Release from Active Duty), dated January 1945, provides uniform procedures in discharging or releasing personnel from active duty.  The instructions for completing the Report of Separation (WD AGO Form 53-55) states that the form is completed from the Service Record, Soldier's Qualification Card, Immunization Register, and information ascertained by interview with the dischargee.
 
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge documents should be corrected to show that he served in the Army from 27 November 1944 to 7 May 1946 because typographic errors were made concerning the year he entered active duty and the year he was discharged.  By inference, in effect, the applicant also contends that other information on his WD AGO Form 53-55 is also incorrect.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted and entered active service in the Army on 27 November 1945.  In fact, the entries for his immunizations (i.e., December 1945, January 1946, and February 1946) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 logically follow his enlistment date (i.e., of 27 November 1945) and, in turn, are logically followed by the period of his overseas service (i.e., from 29 August 1946 to 10 April 1947).  Moreover, there are no entries on the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 that indicate he served in the Army during the period 27 November 1944 through 26 November 1945.

3.  The evidence of record shows that, at the time of his separation, the applicant received two "mustering out" payments; in separate amounts totaling $229.80 and $71.61.  The evidence of record also shows that he was honorably discharged from the Army for the Convenience of the Government under authority of Army Regulation 615-365, dated 24 January 1947, and Army message (TWX) 85018, dated 8 November 1946.  In this regard, the applicant's
2 WD Forms 372A and WD AGO 53-55, with an effective date of 7 May 1947, show the corresponding amounts of the applicant's "mustering out" pay and authority for separation, which serve to validate the accuracy of the documents.  Moreover, as both the Army regulation and Army message cited in the reason for the applicant's discharge are dated 24 January 1947 and 8 November 1946, respectively, it would have been impossible for these documents to have been promulgated and cited as authority for the applicant's discharge, if the applicant was discharged on 7 May 1946 as he claims.  Finally, the evidence of record shows that the applicant placed his signature on both the WD AGO Form 372A and WD AGO 53-55, thereby indicating that he had reviewed the documents and affirmed the accuracy of the information recorded on the documents at that time. Consequently, based on the evidence of record, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the applicant's period of military service as recorded on his
WD AGO Form 53-55 and the date on his Army of the United States Honorable Discharge Certificate are determined to be accurately recorded.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 7 May 1947; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 6 May 1950.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___WFC_  ___EEM _  ___RMN_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




        _William F. Crain____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010892
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
2007/03/08
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19470507
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 615-365
DISCHARGE REASON
Convenience of the Government
BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
Mr. Schwartz
ISSUES         1.
110.0100.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015356,

    Original file (20070015356,.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Mr. D___ concludes by stating “[h]ad [the applicant] not been misdirected into refusing an extended enlistment, he would have only served an additional 38 days prior to discharge and would have received his wings and commission.” Mr. D___ also urges correction of the applicant’s records to show he was commissioned in October 1945; d. WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation - Certificate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004145C070206

    Original file (20050004145C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Date of Entry into Active Service) of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected. The applicant is advised that because his initial entry date of 18 April 1944 is adequately documented in Item 43 of his 2 November 1946 WD AGO Form 53-55, he should suffer no injustice based on the 6 November 1945 entry date contained in Item 24. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017360

    Original file (20090017360.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation—Honorable Discharge) to show he enlisted on 18 May 1943 not 10 November 1945. The WD AGO Form 53-55 the applicant provided shows he entered the Regular Army on 10 November 1945 in Paris, France while serving in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000884

    Original file (20080000884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show his date of induction and date of entry into active service as 25 June 1945. When 1 year, 5 months, and 1 day of total service is subtracted from the applicant's discharge date of 25 November 1946; his date of induction and entry into active service is determined to be 25 June 1945. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010969C080407

    Original file (20070010969C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he was promoted to private first class (PFC) and that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 26 June 1943 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011089C070208

    Original file (20040011089C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM’s WD AGO Form 100 indicates that he held the rank of PFC at the time he was separated. The policy in effect at the time provided for entering the rank a member held on the date of separation in Item 3 and the highest rank a member held in Item 38 of the WD AGO Form 53-55.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003154C070206

    Original file (20050003154C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The "SGO Files Report," was reviewed for any information that the applicant was wounded in action while he served in the PTO. The evidence shows that the applicant was wounded in action two times while he served in World War II. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart, with oak leaf cluster, or the second wound he sustained in action against the enemy on Cebu Island,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009009

    Original file (20090009009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that at the time of his discharge for the purpose of enlistment in the RA, the applicant was assigned to the 94th Military Police Battalion, which is correctly shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55. Therefore, although his unit of assignment is correctly shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55 as the 94th Military Police Battalion, there is no harm to the Army or the applicant if this form is corrected to show he was assigned to the 290th Infantry and his WD AGO Form 53-55 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010061

    Original file (20060010061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Korean Army of Occupation Medal (AOM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his entitlement to the Army of Occupation Medal with Korea Clasp; by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 21 June 1946...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005758C070208

    Original file (20040005758C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 May 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005758 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was assigned to a clearing company that was part of a medical battalion and that...