Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010189
Original file (20060010189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  20 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010189 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.



	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he entered active duty on 3 January 1975.

2.  The applicant essentially states that he knows his date of entry onto active duty.  He also states, in effect, that he went on active duty on 3 January 1975. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 
3 February 1978, the date of his release from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 12 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant stated that he entered active duty on 3 January 1975.  However, the applicant’s DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) clearly shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 February 1975.  Item 57 (Oath of Enlistment) of this document also clearly shows that the applicant signed this document, and shows that he was administered his oath of enlistment in the Regular Army on 5 February 1975.

4.  Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, 640 Chapel Street, New Haven, Connecticut Special Order Number 25, dated 5 February 1975, also clearly shows that the applicant entered active duty on 5 February 1975.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that 

the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he entered active duty on 3 January 1975.

2.  Evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant entered active duty on 
5 February 1975, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which proves that an error exists in his military records by a preponderance of the evidence.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting relief to the applicant in this case.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 3 February 1978; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
2 February 1981.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KN ___  ___DH __  ___LD __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




____Kathleen Newman______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010189
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070320
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.
110.0100.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018840

    Original file (20140018840.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A copy of the 14 September 1978 DD Form 214 is not available in the applicant's military personnel records and the applicant did not provide any documentary evidence in support of his application. However, based on the evidence of record, it would be appropriate to issue the applicant a document showing his honorable period of service in the RA from 11 November 1975 through 14 September 1978. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012568

    Original file (20060012568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 June 1975. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 26 September 1975; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 25 September 1978.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004924

    Original file (20080004924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states he entered active service on 12 October 1988 and was discharged from active duty on 20 February 2000. The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 20 February 2000 and 27 May 1975; a letter from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The Adjutant General of Pennsylvania, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Military Personnel Support Branch; his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003910

    Original file (20090003910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1984, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certificate of Military Service), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), three DD Forms 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Contracts), two military pay vouchers, one Leave and Earnings Statement, and a letter from the Board directing a change to her date of rank. This DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012502

    Original file (20060012502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected by: a. correcting the years and months he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L (Administrative Specialist) in item 11 (Primary Specialty); b. correcting item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty [AD] This Period) from 28 March 1978 to 13 August 1975; c. correcting item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) from 17 years, 5 months, and 2 days to 20 years and 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016768

    Original file (20100016768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, her records should be corrected at this time to reflect in block 7a of her DD Form 214 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn, New York. Accordingly, her DD Form 214 reflected all of her service from 1978 to 1995 and reflected her prior active service as well. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 7a of her DD Form 214 dated 31 May 1995 that she entered active duty in Brooklyn,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003817C070206

    Original file (20050003817C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided documents which confirm his record of service and military service dates; however, this evidence does not support a change to Item 12a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge date from active duty was 23 January 1985. Therefore, Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080007270

    Original file (AR20080007270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to the service entry date on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 30 January 1978. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to Item 15 of his DD Form 214, dated 30 January 1978. He was separated for immediate reenlistment on 30 January 1978 and provided a DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009186C070208

    Original file (20040009186C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5, which establishes the policies and procedures for the preparation and distribution of separation documents, provides, in pertinent part, that a separation report (DD Form 214) will be prepared at the conclusion of a period of active (emphasis added) Federal service. Prior to 1978 Army Regulation 635-5 required the preparation of a DD Form 214 each time an enlisted Soldier was discharged from active service for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. _____ Ted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012476

    Original file (20120012476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 8 December 1978, to show he entered active duty (AD) on 12 February 1975. He was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and entered active duty on 24 March 1975. The applicant's 1978 DD Form 214 correctly reflects his record of service and contains no errors.