SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010120
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in proceedings dated
17 February 2005 were affirmed. The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.
Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz
Acting Director
Mr. Michael L. Engle
Analyst
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 17 February 2005.
Ms. Linda D. Simmons
Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell
Member
Mr. Roland S. Venable
Member
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C Application for correction of military records
Exhibit D Prior Record of Proceedings
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
22. On 19 July 2006, new information was received from the applicant in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20040003371, dated 17 February 2005.
23. The evidence submitted consists of a time line of events, unit manning rosters, military orders, memorandums, a copy of his promotion packet, officer evaluation reports, and his college transcript.
24. In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Division, National Guard Bureau, 111 South George Mason Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22204-1382. Based upon a directive from the Army Review Boards Agency to amend the applicant's date of rank to first lieutenant from 19 June 2002 to 15 December 2000, it opined that the applicant's records should be forwarded to a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to captain under the 2003 promotion criteria.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
8. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20040003371, dated 17 February 2005, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicants record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
9. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20040003371 failed to direct that the applicant's records be submitted for consideration by an SSB for promotion consideration to captain under to 2003 promotion criteria.
BOARD VOTE:
__JTM___ __LDS__ __RSV__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
2. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records set forth in Docket Number AR20040003371, dated 17 February 2005, to show that the applicant's records should be submitted to a Special Selection Board for promotion consideration to captain under the 2003 promotion criteria.
___Linda D. Simmons______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20060010120
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20070322
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
. . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
131.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005727C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, a civilian education waiver and promotion consideration to captain by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2004 criteria. On 23 April 2004, he submitted an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) and requested a waiver of the civilian education and special board consideration for promotion to captain. Therefore, based on the circumstances presented, the officer's deployment and redeployment in support of Operation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004733C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, a civilian education waiver and promotion reconsideration to captain by a special selection board (SSB). The evidence of record shows that based on the applicant's deployment in support of Operation Noble Eagle and Enduring Freedom from December 2003 through February 2005, he was unable to continue and complete degree requirements prior to the convening date of the 2005 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004514C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to captain in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) under the 2000 criteria, with entitlement to back pay and allowances, or promotion consideration to captain by a USAR special selection board (SSB) under the 2000 criteria. The opinion also stated that the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to captain by the FY 2004 Captain, Army Promotion Selection Board that recessed on 21 November 2003. Since there is no basis to consider...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015100
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015100 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In ABCMR Docket Number AR2003096515, the Board recommended and the secretarial authority approved correction of his records to show that a 1 August 2000 request for a waiver was approved and that the applicant be considered by an SSB for promotion to CPT. The advisory official noted that following the last ABCMR case and selection by an SSB the applicant's DOR and effective...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009730C070208
A staff member of the AHRC – Alexandria, advised the Board that the above the zone dates of rank for the fiscal year 2002 medical corps major promotion board was 1 October 1996 through 30 September 1997. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled to promotion consideration by a SSB under the fiscal year 2002 criteria based on the adjustment to his date of rank for captain from 3 June 1999 to 3 June 1997. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009945
The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to captain by the 2002 SSB and was provided an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 2 May 2006. The PRARNG issued Orders 46-209, dated 13 March 2006, promoting the applicant to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 3 March 2006 but with a penned in change to the effective date to read, 2 May 2006, the date Federal recognition was extended. The Departments of the Army and Air Force, NGB, issued the applicant a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016770
The applicant requests, in effect, award of constructive credit for his 10 years of pastoral experience and adjustment to his dates of rank (DOR) for captain and major. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of an Army Reserve Personnel Center-St. Louis (ARPC-SL) Form 1035 (Computation Sheet for Establishing Constructive Commissioned Service Date, DOR, and Projected Promotion Eligibility Date of Reserve Officers), two DD Forms 2088, his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010417C070208
The National Guard Bureau recommended that, if the applicant is not selected for promotion by the selection board that adjourned on 1 April 2005 (since he was affected by STOP-LOSS he was considered by that board), then his records should be forwarded to an SSB for promotion reconsideration. Army Regulation 135-155, table 2-2 states that, to qualify for promotion from captain to major, the officer must complete any officer advanced course not later than the day before the selection board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009543C071113
The result would have been that he would have been promoted to Colonel prior to the conduct of the 2003 Mandatory Promotion Board from Lieutenant Colonel to Colonel. The applicant believes his discussion that was provided to the ABCMR in response to the unfavorable opinion submitted to this Board from the National Guard Bureau shows that the ABCMR should now grant full relief to his request for promotion to colonel. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has failed to provide...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106309C070208
She also states that the Board in its original conclusions stated that promotion to LTC would require seven years of service as a MAJ and adjusting her MAJ date of rank to 1 November 1997 would still not make her eligible for promotion to LTC. In its original conclusions, the Board found the applicant applied for accession into the AGR program prior to the release of the 1997 DA MAJ RCSB and elected to delay her promotion by the Troop Program Unit (TPU) in which she was serving in order to...