Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010045
Original file (20060010045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010045 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that he believes that he is entitled to the Overseas Service Ribbon because he spent a year serving in Germany.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 
9 March 1972, the date of his release from active duty.  The undated application submitted in this case was received on 14 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 August 1970.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Wireman).  He served 1 year, 1 month, and 29 days in Germany, and served with Battery D, 3rd Battalion, 71st Air Defense Artillery.  

4.  Headquarters, 3rd Battalion, 71st Air Defense Artillery Special Orders Number 25, dated 3 February 1972, reassigned the applicant to the United States Army Transfer Station, Fort Dix, New Jersey on or about 10 March 1972.  The authority for this reassignment was paragraph 5-3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), and message, Date/Time Group 102035ZDec71, Subject:  Phasedown Release Program.  

5.  On 9 March 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  The DD Form 214 that was issued to him at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.
6.  Although the applicant essentially completed a normal tour in Germany between 1971 and 1972, which was curtailed because he was released from active duty under the Phasedown Release Program, there is no evidence that he had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Overseas Service Ribbon was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981.  This regulation states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award for successful completion of overseas tours.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981 and the overseas service is not recognized with another U.S. service medal.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon.

2.  Although the applicant completed an tour in Germany, which was cut short by the Government to release the applicant from active duty under the Phasedown Release Program, there is no evidence that he had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981, which is a requirement for retroactively awarding the Overseas Service Ribbon to personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for awarding the Overseas Service Ribbon to the applicant in this case.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 9 March 1972; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 8 March 1975.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___MM__  __JM____  __QS___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




______Mark Manning_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010045
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070222
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.
107.0079.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027199

    Original file (20100027199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal. General Orders Number 2107 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Engineer Command, Vietnam, dated 18 December 1971, awarded him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service from 28 January 1971 to 10 January 1972. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of his subsequent DA Form 2-1 (Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021288

    Original file (20090021288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal and correction of his MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007805

    Original file (20100007805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his duty assignments in Vietnam and the following awards: * Good Conduct Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Army Commendation Medal * Bronze Star Medal * Presidential Unit Citation 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008899

    Original file (20080008899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, the Army Service Ribbon with Numeral 6, the Overseas Service Medal, the Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal, the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon, the Army Superior Unit Award, the Presidential Unit Citation, and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. The applicant was retired on 1 June 1981 and did not have an Active Army status on or after 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003133C070206

    Original file (20050003133C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show that he completed two overseas service tours in Hawaii and he was assigned to Germany twice. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 27 February 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 26 February 1987. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010722

    Original file (20120010722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 31 December 1990 to show: * Two vice three oak leaf clusters with the Meritorious Service Medal * No oak leaf clusters with the Army Commendation Medal * No numerals with the Army Service Ribbon * Two awards of the Overseas Service Ribbon 2. The applicant states: * He was awarded three awards of the Meritorious Service Medal so he should be authorized to display two oak...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004468

    Original file (20140004468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the: * Army Service Ribbon * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007413

    Original file (20130007413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the following and any other award entitlements: * Army Service Ribbon * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. The record does not show and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing he had any active Army service after 1 August 1981; therefore, he is not entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018802

    Original file (20070018802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While assigned in Korea, the applicant reenlisted on 25 April 1975 for a period four years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AFEM to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 April 1981. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019997

    Original file (20100019997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 10 July 1980, to show his total active service and awards. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 10 July 1980 the: * Korea Defense Service Medal *...