Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010030
Original file (20060010030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010030 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


X

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 12 March 1954 be corrected to reflect his correct place of birth as “Sabina, Ohio”, his award of the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that due to poor administrative procedures, his place of birth was incorrectly entered as “Sabanna, Ohio” when in fact it is “Sabina, Ohio.”  He further states that he is entitled to award of the NDSM and that his character of service indicates that he willingly complied with the demands of the military environment, that he was loyal and obedient to superiors and that he faithfully supported the goals of his unit and the Army.  Accordingly, his service qualifies for award of the GCMDL. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center informing the applicant that he qualifies for award of the NDSM. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 12 March 1954.  The application submitted in this case is dated 6 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

4.  The applicant initially served in the Ohio Army National Guard (non-federalized) from 22 September 1947 until he was discharged on 21 September 1950.
5.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1951 for a period of 3 years and was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 7 April 1951.  He completed the tractor-scraper operators course at Fort Belvoir, Virginia in 1953, was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 18 September 1953, and it appears that he was transferred to Germany, where he served for 11 months and 4 days.

6.  On 12 March 1954, he was honorably discharged at Camp Kilmer, New Jersey, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of total active service and had 2 days of lost time due to absence without leave (AWOL).

7.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge indicates in item 11 that his place of birth was “Sabanna, Ohio.”  In item 27, under Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized is the entry “None.”

8.  A search of towns and cities in Ohio indicate that there is no such town or city of “Sabanna”; however, there is a listing for the town of “Sabina”.

9.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 11 November 1956 was not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.
  




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his place of birth as listed on his DD Form 214 is incorrect appears to have merit.  All of the available documents contained in the reconstructed records indicate that his place of birth was “Sabina, Ohio” and since there is no listing of a town of “Sabanna, Ohio”, it is reasonable to presume that an administrative error was the resultant cause of the applicant’s place of birth being incorrectly entered.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that his place of birth is “Sabina, Ohio.” 

2.  The applicant is entitled to award of the NDSM for his service during the period in question and since action has already been taken to issue him that award, it would be appropriate to add the NDSM to his records at this time.  

3.  There is insufficient evidence in the available records to determine what the applicant’s conduct and efficiency ratings were during his service.  Therefore, it must be presumed that the applicant’s commander did not recommend him for award of the GCMDL and the applicant has failed to show sufficient evidence to establish his qualifications for that award.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to award him the GCMDL at this time.  

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 12 March 1954; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
11 March 1957.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available (evidence or argument), it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__X____  __X  __  __X__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his place of birth is “Sabina, Ohio” and that he was awarded the NDSM. 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the GCMDL.




_____ X________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010030
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070227
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(PARTIAL GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.110.0000
189/CORR 214
2.107.0069
115/NDSM
3.107.0056
102/GCMDL
4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005895C070205

    Original file (20060005895C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rea Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant was serving on active duty during a period in which the award of the NDSM was authorized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the NDSM and the GCMDL for the period of 8 September 1958 through 7 September 1961, while serving in the rank of specialist four.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006402C070205

    Original file (20060006402C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of his deceased uncle, a former service member (FSM) be corrected by awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), the Korean War Service Medal (KSM) and any other awards to which he is entitled to receive. He arrived in Korea on 28 September 1950 and was assigned to Medical Company, 8th Cavalry Regiment, for duty as an aidman. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Korean Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005926C070205

    Original file (20060005926C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 20 January 1959 through 19 January 1961. Accordingly, those badges should also be added to his records along with the awards of the NDSM and the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 20 January 1959 to 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007923

    Original file (20100007923.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to reflect: * all of his authorized awards * that he is entitled to be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) * that his most significant unit was B Company, 23rd Infantry Regiment * that he was wounded in Korea on 8 March 1951 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083500C070212

    Original file (2003083500C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his record does not show that he was wounded in action or awarded the PH. This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the Distinguished Unit Citation (DUC) for the period 16 - 22 May 1951 by Department of the Army General Order Number 72, dated 1951. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006693C070205

    Original file (20060006693C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Combat Service Commemorative Ribbon, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Senior Parachutist Badge and the Glider Badge and that his records be corrected to reflect those awards. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant was honorably discharged on 29 August 1952 and has had no further...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061054C070421

    Original file (2001061054C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The evidence of record clearly shows he was entitled to award of the GCMDL for the period 10 May 1950 to 19 July 1952, the CIB, the NDSM, the UNSM, and 2 bronze service stars to the KSM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the GCMDL for the period 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004151

    Original file (20090004151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and was transferred to Fort Gordon, Georgia to attend his advanced individual training as an MP on 22 August 1960. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001260C070205

    Original file (20060001260C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and all other awards he is authorized for his service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. After carefully examining the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091377C070212

    Original file (2003091377C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From The Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH), Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Korean Service Medal (KSM), and United Nations Service Medal (UNSM). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...