Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009912C080410
Original file (20060009912C080410.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 APRIL 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060009912


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz            |     |Acting Director      |
|     |                                  |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |                                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |                                  |     |Member               |
|     |                                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his
discharge.

2.  The applicant states that he was informed that President Carter granted
clemency to draft dodgers and feels he is eligible for an upgrade of his
undesirable discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his
request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 22 December 1971.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 3 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 February 1969, for a
period of 3 years.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the
applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 13 March 1969 to 20 March
1969, and from 2 October 1969 to 30 October 1969.

5.  On 26 June 1970, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial
of being AWOL from 8 January 1970 to 4 April 1970.  The court sentenced him
to
confinement at hard labor for 4 months, forfeiture of $88.00 pay per month
for
4 months, and reduction to pay grade E-1.

6.  On 10 May 1971, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial
of being AWOL from 12 December 1970 to 24 March 1971, and from 30 March
1971 to 15 April 1971.  He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for
5 months, forfeiture of $95.00 per month for 5 months and reduction to pay
grade E-1.
7.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was in military confinement or AWOL
from 18 April to 13 May 1971, 14 May 1971 to 21 June 1971, and 30 September
1971 to 21 November 1971.

8.  On 11 May 1971, certification by the Chief, Neuropsychiatry Services
found the applicant mentally responsible, able to distinguish right from
wrong and adhere to the right, had the mental capacity to understand and
participate in board proceedings, and that there was no disqualifying
mental or physical defects sufficient to warrant disposition through
medical channels.

9.  On 28 April 1971, the applicant's commander recommended his discharge
prior to expiration of his term of service under the provisions or Army
Regulation 635-212 for unfitness.  Elimination was recommended because the
applicant had accumulated approximately 418 days of bad time through
periods of AWOL and confinement.  He had been convicted on AWOL charges by
one special court-martial, and was pending a second special court-martial
for two subsequent AWOL periods.  The applicant was notified of the pending
elimination action on 28 April 1971.

10.  On 29 April 1971, a medical examination cleared the applicant for
separation.

11.  Additional facts and circumstances concerning the applicant's
discharge proceedings are not in the available records.  However, on 22
December 1971, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army
Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the service, under other
than honorable conditions.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he and 1 year, 4 months
and 23 days of creditable service and 498 days of lost time.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides,
in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses
for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at
any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  A
discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered
appropriate.  However, at the time of the applicant's separation the
regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.



13.  Presidential Proclamation 4313, issued on 16 September 1974, by
President Ford, provided for the issuance of a clemency discharge to
certain former soldiers who voluntarily entered into and completed an
alternate restitution program specifically designed for former soldiers who
received a less than honorable discharge for AWOL related incidents between
August 1964 and March 1973.  Upon successful completion of the alternate
service, former members would be granted a clemency discharge by the
President of the United States, thus restoring his or her affected civil
rights.  The clemency discharge did not affect the underlying discharge and
did not entitle the individual to any benefits administered by the Veterans
Administration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Presidential Proclamation 4313 was implemented on 16 September 1974, by
then President Ford.  The proclamation provided that certain categories of
person who were permitted to apply for a clemency discharge.  While the
applicant may have been eligible for this program, there is no evidence
that he ever applied for the program or completed any of the required
alternate service.  The program is no longer available, and even if the
applicant had fulfilled the requirements the clemency discharge would not
have affected his underlying discharge, and would not have entitled him to
any Department of the Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the
applicant's discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and
regulation applicable at the time.

3.  The applicant voluntarily requested separation under the provisions of
Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu
of trial by court-martial.

4.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were
appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the
applicant's request.


7.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 22 December 1971; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 21 December 1974.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JS___  __DH ___  ___JH___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ______ _______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060009912                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20070419                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009893

    Original file (20100009893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 January 1971, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 28 January 1971. Evidence of record shows he was awarded a clemency discharge in 1975 pursuant to PP 4313 of 16 September 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010876

    Original file (20100010876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Undesirable Discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He was advised that, in order to participate in the program, he must agree to participate in the President’s Program; agree to reaffirm his allegiance to the United States; and pledge to perform alternate service for a period not to exceed 24 months (this portion of the program was administered by the Selective Service System and entailed performance of work in jobs that promoted the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014827

    Original file (20130014827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge to an honorable discharge. The complete facts and circumstances concerning the applicant's discharge proceedings are not in the available records; however, on 3 December 1970, the general court-martial convening authority approved the applicant's request for excess leave without pay pending execution of his bad conduct discharge. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge because he received a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010073

    Original file (20120010073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He received a clemency discharge issued pursuant to Presidential Proclamation Number 4313 (PP 4313) * He went into the Army at age 17 * He served in Germany and Vietnam * He got hepatitis C while he was in the Army and has been suffering 32 years * He needs treatment at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) because he can’t get insurance 3. On 2 October 1971, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706226

    Original file (9706226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 February 1975, the applicant was discharged, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313, in pay grade E-1. If they completed the alternate service satisfactorily, they would be entitled to receive a Clemency Discharge. The award of a Clemency Discharge could be considered by this Board, but the discharge per se did not require relief be granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706226C070209

    Original file (9706226C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 February 1975, the applicant was discharged, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313, in pay grade E-1. If they completed the alternate service satisfactorily, they would be entitled to receive a Clemency Discharge. The award of a Clemency Discharge could be considered by this Board, but the discharge per se did not require relief be granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017690

    Original file (20090017690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). For those who elected discharge, a Joint Alternate Service Board composed of military personnel would establish a period of alternate service of not more than 24 months that the individuals were to perform. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006680

    Original file (20120006680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 October 1971, he acknowledged that he had been advised by counsel of the contemplated action to separate him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Misconduct (Fraudulent Entry, Conviction by Civil Court, and Absence without Leave or Desertion)) by reason of conviction by a civil court. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020823

    Original file (20110020823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The Joint Alternate Service Board established by Presidential Proclamation 4313 reviewed the applicant's official records and determined that he would be required to serve 21 months of alternate service. He also understood: * he must report to his State Director of Selective Service for alternate service within 15 days of discharge * satisfactory completion of such service would be acknowledged by issuance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003601C070205

    Original file (20060003601C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter indicates that Presidential Proclamation 4313 further provided that those servicemen who satisfactorily completed an assigned period of alternate service of not more than 24 months would be issued a Clemency Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence of record which indicates he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant’s records were reviewed for an upgrade of his discharge...