Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008823
Original file (20060008823.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  29 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060008823 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  



Acting Director



Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson


Member



Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his mandatory removal date (MRD) be corrected to reflect his actual date of commissioning as an officer. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that his MRD should be corrected to reflect his actual date of commissioning, and states that the date of his commissioning was 16 December 1988.  He also states, in effect, that his current MRD reflects his time as a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadet. 

3.  The applicant provides his DA Form 597 (Army Senior ROTC Student Contract) and orders reassigning him to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) on 16 December 1988 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant stated that his current MRD reflects his time as an ROTC cadet; however, it does not appear that his ROTC time was used in his MRD calculation.  

2.  The applicant also stated, in pertinent part, that his actual date of commissioning was 16 December 1988.  However, the applicant’s DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel) and his original letter of appointment both clearly show that he was originally commissioned in the USAR on 8 December 1988.

3.  During the processing of this case, and advisory opinion was obtained from the National Guard Affairs Office, United States Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri.  That office recommended no change to the applicant’s MRD at this time.  The advisory opinion also stated that the applicant’s MRD is established at 28 years from the date of his commissioning, not 30 years as the applicant has indicated.  This advisory opinion also essentially noted that if the applicant obtains the rank of colonel, he will be allowed an additional 2 years, making his MRD 30 years from the date of his commissioning.

4.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for rebuttal or comment, and provided 30 days to provide a response.  The applicant failed to respond with the time permitted.


5.  Believing that the applicant had not clearly articulated the issues in his application, the analyst for this case contacted the applicant on 6 March 2007.  The applicant clarified that he is looking for his current MRD of 1 January 2017 to be adjusted for the break in service he had from his discharge on 3 October 2002, in which all of his officer appointments were terminated, until he was commissioned in the Tennessee Army National Guard on 16 February 2005.  

6.  The applicant’s official military personnel file contains a separation order, dated 9 October 2002, which discharged the applicant from the USAR on 
3 October 2002.  This order also stated, in pertinent part, that all of the applicant’s Reserve of the Army and Army of the United States appointments were terminated on that date.  

7.  On 16 February 2005, the applicant was commissioned in the rank of captain in the Tennessee Army National Guard.  He has been a member of the Army National Guard to this date.  

8.  The officer did not have an affiliation with the Armed Forces of the United States from 4 October 2002 through 15 February 2005.  Basic office computation translates that into a break in service of 2 years, 4 months, and 12 days.

9.  Using the MRD calculator found on the United States Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri website, the applicant’s rank, date of birth, original appointment date, and the length of his break in service in years, months, and days were entered.  From that, it was determined that his MRD, taking his break in service into account, should be 1 January 2019.  The reason for his MRD is that he will have surpassed 28 years of service on that date.  If the applicant attains the rank of colonel before his MRD, it will then move to 
1 January 2021, as he would then have surpassed 30 years of service on that date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his MRD should be corrected. 

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was originally appointed on 
8 December 1988, but that he was discharged, and had all of this officer appointments terminated on 3 October 2002.  The officer had a break in service of 2 years, 4 months, and 12 days, and his current MRD has not been adjusted to account for his break in service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show that his new MRD is 1 January 2019.  If the applicant is 

promoted to colonel prior to his new MRD, his MRD will be adjusted again to 
1 January 2021.

BOARD VOTE:

__LE____  __LB ___  ___MF __  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adjusting his current MRD from 1 January 2017 to 1 January 2019.  





______Lester Echols________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060008823
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070329
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
AR 15-185
ISSUES         1.
100.0000.0000
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015754

    Original file (20130015754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * ROTC contract * Sworn statement * DD Form 1870 (Request for Personnel Security Investigation) * Oath of office * Report of medical examination * Promotion orders * JAGC commission offer * Application for active duty * Appointment as Reserve commissioned officer * Active duty report * Email from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command * Excerpt from Army Regulation 601-25 (Delay in Reporting for and Exemption from Active Duty, Initial Active Duty for Training, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021467

    Original file (20130021467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This number of years is incorrect because his GME contract states that his other active duty time (non-GME from ROTC) can be served concurrently, making his current ADSO ending on 30 June 2017, not 30 June 2021. d. The error was made by the Tripler GME office for incorrectly stating his ADSO on the contract and by himself for signing a contract with an incorrect starting date. d. While the GME obligation and the ROTC/HPSP scholarship obligations may be served concurrently, the discharge of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016406

    Original file (20140016406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The applicant's record is void of orders or any evidence that shows his resignation was accepted and processed by AR-PERSCOM or that shows he was ever issued orders discharging him from the USAR Control Group. On 1 May 2014, the applicant submitted a request to HRC requesting his MRD be adjusted to account for his breaks in service from 19 January to 16 August 1993 and from 27 October 2003 to 2 November 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020310

    Original file (20120020310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 May 1990, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of 2LT. He requested transfer to the USAR Control Group (IRR) to attend law school, attended law school from August 1993 to May 1996, graduated with a J.D., and was appointed into the JAG Corps on 7 April 1997. c. there is no indication the applicant applied for a post-graduate delay in accordance with Army Regulation 601-25 (Delay in Reporting for and Exemption from Active Duty, Initial Active Duty for Training,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013642

    Original file (20090013642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be granted service credit for his participation in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP) and that his pay entry basic date (PEBD) be adjusted accordingly. The applicant's NGB Form 22 confirms he was discharged from the PAARNG on 27 December 1987 and was credited with 1 year, 3 months, and 26 days of service in the SMP. The DODFMR, volume 7A, subparagraph 010101.B, states that for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006343

    Original file (20110006343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD), from 31 August 2016 to 30 November 2019 * adjustment of his date of rank (DOR), from 17 December 2000 to 31 March 2004 2. The applicant states, in effect: a. he was reappointed and promoted in accordance with the provisions of the Wxxxxx lawsuit (Settlement Agreement, Lxxxx J. Wxxxxx vs. Fxxxxxx J. Hxxxxx, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, U.S. District Court for the Western District of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067761C070402

    Original file (2002067761C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show he participated in the SMP as a member of the Middle Tennessee State University ROTC and the ARNG from 14 October 1985 until his commissioning on 8 May 1987. On 14 October 1985, the applicant enlisted in the Tennessee ARNG. Public Law (PL) 104-201, Section 507, dated 23 September 1996, amended the provisions of the law to provide service credit to officers commissioned from the ROTC Advanced Course program who also participated in the SMP, retroactive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014117

    Original file (20140014117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a memorandum from the Chief, Officer Division, Department of the Army Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, to HRC, dated 30 September 2011, which states: * the request to retain the applicant beyond his MRD was returned without action * the applicant reached his MRD on 1 August 2011 and must be transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged as soon as possible * there is no other legal authority for him to remain on the RASL 7. The evidence shows he was granted an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022266

    Original file (20110022266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * Extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to 30 September 2011 * Service credit and recalculation of retired pay to include all service completed between his current MRD of 7 May 2010 through the adjusted MRD * Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to include the creditable service as well as award of the Meritorious Service Medal 2. The applicant states: * His MRD was 7 May 2010 prior to changing his status from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001599

    Original file (20150001599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the Board finds that he was improperly discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2007 * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to reflect the breaks in service * restoration of his highest rank achieved, lieutenant colonel (LTC), and that he be allowed to continue to serve in that capacity until mandatory retirement at age 60 * service credit in the rank of LTC retroactive to the date of his enlistment on 21 February 2014 2. On 3 April 2013, by email,...