Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008799
Original file (20060008799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 March 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060008799 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz 

Acting Director

M

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Kenneth L. Wright

Chairperson

Mr. Chester A. Damian

Member

Ms. Ernestine I. Fields

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1.

2.  The applicant states the RE-4 code entry is a typographical error and he would like to have it corrected.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 2 September 1984, the date of his separation from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 17 May 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The record shows the applicant entered active duty on 3 September 1981, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 68G1O (Aircraft Structural Repairer).

4.  The applicant was advanced to private first class on 3 September 1982.

5.  On 19 August 1983, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15 Uniform Code of Military Justice, for illegal use of marijuana.  His punishment was reduction in grade to private two (PV2), a forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 1 month, and 30 days of extra duty. 

6.  On 23 May 1984 his command imposed a bar to promotion. 

7.  On 2 Sept 1984, the applicant was honorably separated from active duty, as a PV2, and transferred to the Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had 3 years of creditable service with no lost time noted.
8.  His DD Form 214 lists the narrative reason for separation as expiration of term of service, the separation code as LBK, and the RE code as an RE-4.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-2 (Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions [Flags]), paragraph 1-14 states, in pertinent part, that when a flag is properly imposed, promotion and reenlistment are prohibited.

10.  Army Regulation 601-280 (Personnel Procurement Army Retention Program) prescribes criteria for the Army Retention Program.  In pertinent part it states that the reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes contained on military discharge documents determine whether or not one may reenlist or enlist in a military service at a later time.  In general, those who receive an RE Code of "1" may reenlist in the Army or another service with no problem.  Individuals with an RE Code of "2" may usually reenlist in the Army or another service with various restrictions, or if the circumstances which resulted in the code no longer apply.  Individuals with an RE Code of "3" can normally reenlist in the Army or another Service, but will probably require a waiver to be processed.  Individuals with an Army RE Code of "4" are normally not eligible to reenlist in the Army, nor join another service.  An RE-4 applies to persons separated with a nonwaivable disqualification, this includes persons separated in pay grade E-2 and below and those separated with a Department of the Army imposed bar to reenlistment in effect.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was flagged for promotion and was in pay grade E-2 at the time of his separation from active duty.  Both of these factors result in his being disqualified for reenlistment and the RE 4 is appropriate.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 2 September 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 September 1987.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KLW__  __EF____  __CD___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__    Kenneth L. Wright____
          CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060008799
SUFFIX

RECON
 
DATE BOARDED
20070327 
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
 )
DATE OF DISCHARGE
 
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
 
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.03
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003328

    Original file (20080003328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests lifting of a suspension of favorable personnel actions (FLAG) imposed against him as a result of criminal charges, and restoration of all rights and privileges, to include grade advancement, pay increases, and death benefits for the death of his dependent child. The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 19 January 1984. The evidence of record shows that at the time of the applicant's military service, the Army did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018532

    Original file (20120018532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 199 documenting the PEB Proceedings shows his rank as PFC at that time. (1) The advisory official stated the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 October 2008 for a $30,000.00 enlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show 5 November as his anniversary date for the purpose of bonus installment payments and paying him the $4,000.00 bonus installment he would have been due on 5...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019074

    Original file (20080019074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his records show he did not complete 55D MOS training and was reassigned to Fort Bliss, TX, where he completed training for MOS 14J (Early Warning System Operator). When the commander denies promotion, he or she may promote the Soldier on the next automated Enlisted Advancement Report, provided the Soldier is otherwise qualified. By regulation, he should have been automatically advanced to PV2 six months after his entry on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008076

    Original file (20130008076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) to: * remove non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 15 March 2012, (hereinafter referred to as the contested NJP) * restore his date of rank (DOR) to 1 August 2011 as his DOR to staff sergeant (SSG) * remove the Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the period ending on 24 March 2012 2. He provided a Memorandum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007930

    Original file (20080007930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007792

    Original file (20080007792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army Reenlistment Eligibility Codes (RE codes): a. RE–1, applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055498C070420

    Original file (2001055498C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD From 214, be corrected to show her rank and grade as Private, E-2 (PV2), her date of separation as 7 February 2001, her net active service as 1 year, 2 months, and 18 days of service, and that she was a high school graduate or equivalent. In December 2000, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for failing to go to her appointed place of duty. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013294

    Original file (20120013294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence to show the applicant was recommended for promotion to SPC/E-4 during his period of service. e. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. The applicable regulation states that promotion to SPC is automatic with 24 months TIS provided the Soldier is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024399

    Original file (20110024399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was presented the Army Commendation Medal and Army Good Conduct Medal, at the end of his tour in Germany. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. In addition, in the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013519

    Original file (20130013519.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military record to: * show her rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 instead of private PV1/E-1) * show her correct time in service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * fulfill her Student Loan Re-payment Program (SLRP) agreement 2. The applicant states: * her rank of E-1 was given after a commanding officer in another unit made them give her a rank * her time in service is incorrect; she completed her 2-week drills and one weekend a month drills * she had...