Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007706C070205
Original file (20060007706C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            17 January 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20060007706


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland          |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Meixell                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. William Powers                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Roland Venable                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be
corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the
Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and three awards of the Army Commendation
Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states that he was awarded the CIB, the AAM and three
awards of the ARCOM (ARCOM w/2nd OLC [oak leaf cluster]); however, he did
not receive orders for all of the awards.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and copies of awards
certificates for one award of the AAM and three awards of the ARCOM.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He enlisted in the Regular Army in Raleigh, North Carolina on 9 May
2001 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his one-station unit training
(OSUT) at Fort Benning, Georgia and was awarded the military occupational
specialty (MOS) of an indirect fire infantryman.  Upon completion of his
training he was transferred to Korea, where he served until being
transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, for duty in an armor battalion.

2.  He deployed to Iraq on 8 April 2003, was advanced to the pay grade of E-
4 on 1 September 2003, and returned to Fort Hood on 16 April 2004.

3.  On 8 May 2004, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due
to completion of required service.  He had served 3 years of total active
service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates that
he was awarded the Army Lapel Button, the Global War on Terrorism
Expeditionary Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, the
National Defense Service Medal, the Korea Defense Service Medal, the Army
Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

4.  A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant was
awarded the CIB or that he met the criteria for award of the CIB.
Additionally, there are no orders present in the available records showing
that he was awarded an AAM or ARCOM.  It is also noted that there is no
derogatory information contained in his records that would serve to
disqualify him for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).

5.  The copies of awards certificates submitted by the applicant indicate
that he was awarded the AAM for the period of 8 May 2001 to 7 May 2004 by
orders number 057-01, issued by Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 67th Armor
Regiment in Iraq.  He also submits certificates showing that he was awarded
two ARCOMs on permanent order number 036-39, one for the period of 1
September 2003 to
12 September 2003 and one for the period of 9 April to 30 October 2003.  He
also provides a certificate showing that he was awarded the ARCOM in
permanent orders number 050-95 dated 19 February 2004 for the period of
1 September to 12 September 2003, the same period covered in the ARCOM
issued in permanent order number 036-39.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to
enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military
occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground
combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade,
regimental or smaller size.

7.  AR 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to
individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and
fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This
period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award
ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.
Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal,
disqualification must be justified.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 further states that only one decoration will
be awarded to an individual for the same act, achievement, or period of
meritorious service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The Board accepts the applicant’s contention that he was awarded the
AAM.  Therefore. It would be appropriate to enter that award on his DD Form
214 at this time.

2.  However, the applicant’s three awards of the ARCOM include two awards
for the same period, which is precluded by the applicable regulation.
Accordingly, it would be appropriate to enter only two awards of the ARCOM
(ARCOM w/1OLC) to his DD Form 214 at this time.

3.  The applicant’s contention that he was awarded the CIB has been noted;
however, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his
application or the evidence of record that he was awarded the CIB or that
he met the criteria for that award.  Therefore, absent evidence to show
that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned to an infantry unit,
there appears to be no basis to award him the CIB at this time.

4.  A review of the applicant's records revealed no disqualifying
information that would result in denial of the Good Conduct Medal to the
applicant.  There are no entries or documents indicating that he was ever
disqualified from award of the Good Conduct Medal by any of his unit
commanders.  There is no evidence of a breach of good order or discipline
in the applicant's service personnel records, and it appears that the
failure to award this Soldier the Good Conduct Medal was an administrative
oversight and not related to anything he did to disqualify himself from
this award.  The applicant is therefore entitled to award of the Good
Conduct Medal or the period of 9 May 2001 through 8 May 2004 and to have
this award added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

__JM ___  ___WP__  ___RV __  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 9 May
2001 to 8 May 2004 and by showing that he was awarded the AAM and ARCOM
w/1OLC.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the CIB and ARCOM w/2nd OLC.



                                  _____   John Meixell____
                                            CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060007706                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |YYYYMMDD                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(PARTIAL GRANT)                         |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES                  |46/DE                                   |
|1.107.0000              |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090949C070212

    Original file (2003090949C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has failed to show through the evidence presented and the evidence of record that he was awarded the CIB. However, the evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015003

    Original file (20060015003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the award of Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and any awards for his service in Iraq. Records show the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show in item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 "Service in Kuwait (Operation Desert Spring) From 20020519 – 20021202; and Service in Iraq...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005065

    Original file (20070005065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM and the AAM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show in item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 Service in Iraq 20040110 – 20050112. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of ARCOM, AAM, CIB, in item 12f (Foreign Service) the entry 0001 00 03, and in item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 Service in Iraq...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005281

    Original file (20090005281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM with 1st oak leaf cluster (OLC)) and two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM with 1st OLC). Therefore, it is accepted as evidence that the applicant was awarded one ARCOM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018353

    Original file (20080018353.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-4h(13) of Army Regulation 635-5 states to list awards and decorations for all periods service and paragraph 2-4h(14) states that formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214 will be listed in Item 14. The evidence of record also shows that when the applicant received his first ARCOM award, he had no previous awards listed. There is also no evidence of record that shows official orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011591C070208

    Original file (20040011591C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also establishes that the applicant is entitled to award of the Iraq Campaign Medal for his service in Iraq. Accordingly, he will be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 11 January 2001 to 10 January 2004 and the Iraq Campaign Medal and by showing that he was awarded the CIB, the ARCOM and the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010629C071029

    Original file (20060010629C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his foreign service from December 2003 to May 2004 and to show he was awarded the Parachutist Badge, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), two awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and any other awards that may have been given to his unit. The evidence shows the applicant was awarded two ARCOMs. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012548

    Original file (20100012548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * award of two Army Achievement Medals (AAM) [properly known as the AAM with First Oak Leaf Cluster (AAM w/1OLC)] * award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCM) * completion of the Combat Lifesaver Course * her foreign service 2. She provides copies of: * a DD Form 214 * two DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award) * an Eligibility...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012784

    Original file (20140012784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his deployments and awards. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007687

    Original file (20080007687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show he was “put in for promotion to E6,” that he was “put in” for the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and that he is entitled to unit awards. However, even though the applicant may have participated in additional flights after the award of the 23rd OLC to his AM, there is no evidence or indication that he had sufficient assault missions to warrant any additional awards of the AM. As a result, the...