Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006411C070205
Original file (20060006411C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        30 November 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060006411


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William Crain                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Alice Muellerweiss            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Donald Lewy                   |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received
in 1968 during his tour in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he was overlooked.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred
on 3 December 1968.  The application submitted in this case is dated 3
April 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 14 September 1966.  He
completed basic combat training at Fort Benning, Georgia and was reassigned
to Fort Polk, Louisiana for advanced individual training (AIT).  At the
completion of AIT, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11C
(Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

4.  The applicant was assigned to Company C, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry,
9th Infantry Division in Vietnam on 25 February 1967.

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he
was awarded the Purple Heart.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification
Record) does not list any wounds as a result of hostile action in item 40
(Wounds).  His name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

6.  The applicant departed Vietnam on 25 February 1968.

7.  The applicant was released from active duty on 3 December 1968.  His
DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with three
bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat
Infantryman Badge, the Air Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and
the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and Pistol
Bar.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) shows that, at the time of the applicant’s
assignment to the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, this unit was cited for
award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by
Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 31, dated 1969.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that, at the time of the
applicant’s assignment to the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, this unit was
cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First
Class Unit Citation by DAGO Number 43, dated 1970.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the
medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  This
regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on
requests for award of the Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders which authorize award of the Purple Heart to the
applicant.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  There
are no medical documents which verify he was wounded as a result of hostile
action in Vietnam in 1968.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to
award the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period it was cited for
award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit
Citation.  Therefore, these awards should be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
errors which do not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative
correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case
Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the
Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section
below.


4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 3 December 1968; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 2 December 1971.  Although the applicant did not file
within the ABCMR's statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive
failure to timely file in this case based on the fact there is no statute
of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

WC______  AM______  DL______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that administrative errors in the records of the
individual concerned should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests
that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the
individual concerned to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with
Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal
First Class Unit Citation.




                                  William Crain_________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060006411                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061130                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY WITH NOTE                          |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |MR. CHUN                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017599

    Original file (20090017599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these badges. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008648

    Original file (20110008648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars; c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart (2nd Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015568

    Original file (20100015568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 shows one award of the Purple Heart * He was injured three times and he only received two awards of the Purple Heart * The awards section on his DA Form 20 is missing a third Purple Heart, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * His DD Form 214 and DA Form 20 should both include all his medals and honors 3. The applicant provides: * page 4 of his DA Form 20 * general orders for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000425

    Original file (20100000425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The document provided clearly identifies the applicant and shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound that he received from a booby trap on 12 July 1968. c. Despite the absence of any additional evidence in the applicant's military personnel records, it is concluded that the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04105982C070208

    Original file (04105982C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither his separation document, nor his Department of the Army Form 20 reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (wounds) on his Form 20 is blank. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show: a. qualification as an expert with the M-14 rifle and award of the associated badge and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040003572C070208

    Original file (040003572C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of these decorations. The evidence confirms that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart, that he is entitled to four bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, a Valorous Unit Award, two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004730C070206

    Original file (20050004730C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 19 September 1967. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was injured a second time as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart (Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster) in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by deleting the Bronze Star Medal from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007757C070208

    Original file (20040007757C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 July 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040007757 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012895

    Original file (20080012895.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012895 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal-First Class Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004633C070206

    Original file (20050004633C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...