RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 October 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005862
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Wanda L. Waller | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Carmen Duncan | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Jerome Pionk | |Member |
| |Ms. Rea Nuppenau | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the
Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge).
2. The applicant states that he was not awarded the Combat Infantryman
Badge for his service in France and Belgium from late November/early
December 1944 until he was evacuated for frozen feet in late December
1944/early January 1945. He contends that he is also entitled to the
Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record
and Report of Separation).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of alleged errors which occurred
on
10 July 1945. The application submitted in this case is dated 14 April
2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for
review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the
applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there
were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board
to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.
4. The applicant was inducted on 1 April 1944. His WD AGO Form 53-55
shows his military occupational specialty as 761 (scout). He served in the
European Theater of Operations from 25 October 1944 through 2 February
1945. On 10 July 1945, he was honorably discharged by reason of
physical disability.
5. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the European-African-Middle
Eastern Campaign Medal with one bronze service stars as an authorized
award.
6. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available
records.
7. War Department Circular 269-1943 established the Combat Infantryman
Badge and the Expert Infantryman Badge to recognize and provide an
incentive to infantrymen. The Expert Infantryman Badge was to be awarded
for attainment of certain proficiency standards or by satisfactory
performance of duty in action against the enemy. The Combat Infantryman
Badge was awarded for exemplary conduct in action against the enemy. War
Department Circular 186-1944 further provided that the Combat Infantryman
Badge was to be awarded only to infantrymen serving with infantry units of
brigade, regimental or smaller size.
Additionally, World War II holders of the Combat Infantryman Badge received
a monthly pay supplement known as combat infantry pay and holders of the
Expert Infantryman Badge were entitled to expert infantry pay. Therefore,
Soldiers had economic as well as intangible reasons to ensure that their
records were correct. Thus, pay records are frequently the best available
source to verify entitlement to this award. The Awards Branch, U.S. Army
Human Resources Command, has advised in similar cases that, during World
War II, the Combat Infantryman Badge was normally awarded only to enlisted
individuals who served in the following positions:
a. Light machine gunner (604)
b. Heavy machine gunner (605)
c. Platoon sergeant (651)
d. Squad leader (653)
e. Rifleman (745)
f. Automatic rifleman (746)
g. Heavy weapons NCO (812)
h. Gun crewman (864)
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded for heroism and for meritorious
achievement or service in military operations against an armed enemy. The
Bronze Star Medal is authorized for each individual who was cited in orders
or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat between
7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945 or whose achievement or service,
during that period, was confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July
1947. An award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Medical Badge
is considered to be a citation in orders. This means, in effect, that the
Bronze Star Medal is to be awarded to individuals who were authorized
either badge for service during World War II.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the
World War II Victory Medal. It is awarded for service between 7 December
1941 and 31 December 1946, both dates inclusive.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge and there is no
evidence of record which shows that the applicant performed exemplary
conduct in action against the enemy while serving in a prerequisite
position. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base
award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Bronze Star Medal (based on
award of the Combat Infantryman Badge) in this case.
2. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the
World War II Victory Medal.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged errors
now under consideration on 10 July 1945; therefore, the time for the
applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 1 January 1950
(3 years after the Board was established on 2 January 1947). The applicant
did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and based on the
available evidence it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
4. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain an administrative
error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
CD_____ __JP____ ___RN___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
3. The Board determined that an administrative error in the records of the
individual concerned should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests
that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the
individual concerned
to show that he was awarded the World War II Victory Medal.
__Carmen Duncan_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060005862 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20061024 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |107.0111 |
|2. |107.0014 |
|3. |107.0000 |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002175
The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Service) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the American Campaign Medal, the World War II Victory Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and/or the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the World War II Victory Medal and the American Campaign Medal, neither of which is shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55; therefore,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001344
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 31 (Military Qualifications and Date) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001184
The applicant states that his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) should read "Combat Infantryman Badge" not "Expert Infantry Badge." The applicant contends he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge during World War II and that the Expert Infantryman Badge reflected on his WD AGO Form 53-55 was a typographical error. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089788C070403
Based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the applicant is entitled to an award of the Bronze Star Medal. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records but only as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge), the EAME with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006584
Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he was in combat in the Philippines in 1945 but, his discharge says nothing about the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Victory Ribbon and the APT Ribbon, with one bronze service star, from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001585
However, evidence provided by the applicant shows that he was an infantryman and served in a infantry unit. The WD Form 372A is accepted as sufficient evidence to show the applicant's eligibility for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in lieu of the Expert Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 31 of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 the Expert Infantryman Badge; b....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016590
The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his WD Form 53-55 to show this award. The applicant is also entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal based on award of this Combat Infantryman Badge and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show the Bronze Star Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015586
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 17 November 1944 in Germany; b. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; and c. amending his WD AGO Form 53-55 to add the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018588
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show he is entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this award. Records show he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Bronze Star Medal based upon award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 the EAME Campaign...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001654C070206
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. Based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the applicant is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal.