Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005685C070205
Original file (20060005685C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            22 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20060005685


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland          |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda Simmons                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John Meixell                  |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Jerome Pionk                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the
pay grade of E-7 be reinstated to his prior-service promotion date.

2.  The applicant states that he is a prior-service noncommissioned officer
(NCO) who was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 21 October 1988 and
exited the Army in 1992.  He goes on to state that he reentered the Army
and was again promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 April 2006 and he
desires to have his DOR adjusted to reflect the time he served in that
grade during his prior service.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his promotion orders, enlistment
contract and report of separation (DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted on 27 June 1978 and remained on active duty
through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay
grade of E-7 on 1 November 1988.

2.  On 28 July 1992, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 and the Fiscal Year 1992 Enlisted
Voluntary Early Transition Program.  He had served 14 years. 1 month and 2
days of total active service and received $48,085.28 in Special Separation
Benefits (SSB).

3.  He enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 29 July 1992
for a period of 3 years, in the pay grade of E-7 and remained in the USAR
until he was honorably discharged on 21 June 1994.

4.  On 23 August 2001, he again enlisted in the USAR in the pay grade of E-
6 for a period of 6 years.  He remained in the USAR until he enlisted in
the Regular Army with a waiver on 14 February 2002, in the pay grade of E-
6.  At the time of his enlistment his contract indicated that his DOR would
be adjusted at his first duty station in accordance with Army Regulation
600-20.

5.  He applied to this Board for an adjustment of his DOR in the pay grade
of E-6 and this Board granted his request by adjusting his DOR to 11
February 1993.  He subsequently applied to the Board again and was granted
a Broken Service Selective Reenlistment Bonus as an exception to policy.


6.  On 28 February 2005, he reenlisted in the Regular Army in the pay grade
of E-6 for an indefinite period.

7.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 effective 1 April 2006, with a
DOR of 1 April 2006.

8.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained
from the Human Resources Command in Alexandria, Virginia, which opines that
the applicant was afforded a DOR adjustment when he reentered the Army as a
prior service enlistee and that he was not entitled to any further
adjustments.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for
comment and to date, the staff of the Board has received no response from
the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-20 provides the guidance for establishing the DOR
of enlisted soldiers.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DOR of
prior service personnel will be established at the time a Soldier reenters
the service and if the Soldier had a break in service of more than 90 days,
the DOR of the enlistment grade is the date preceding the enlistment by a
period equal to the length of time previously service in the Regular Army
in the same or higher grade than in which reenlisted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At the time the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, he did so with
the understanding that he would be enlisting in the pay grade of E-6 and
that his DOR would be adjusted.  His DOR was subsequently adjusted to allow
him credit for his prior service in the same and higher grade in accordance
with the applicable regulation.

2.  The applicant’s promotion to the pay grade of E-7 was based on his
being selected by a centralized promotion selection board and his DOR for
promotion to the pay grade of E-7 was determined by his new adjusted DOR to
the pay grade of E-6.

3.  He was properly promoted and given a DOR in accordance with the
applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time, with no indication
of any violations of his rights.  Accordingly, there is no basis to further
adjust his DOR.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy this requirement.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____LS__  ___JM __  ____JP__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





                                  _____Linda Simmons_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060005685                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060822                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |N/A AC Soldier on AD                    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |N/A AC Soldier on AD                    |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |N/A AC Soldier on AD                    |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |N/A AC Soldier on AD                    |
|BOARD DECISION          |(DENY)                                  |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Ar 15-185                               |
|ISSUES                  |315/DOR                                 |
|1.131.0500              |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060001949C070205

    Original file (AR20060001949C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 April 2005, while in Heidelberg, Germany, he was granted a waiver and enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years in the pay grade of E-6. The applicant was originally promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 December 1997 and served in that pay grade for 4 years, 11 months and 6 days before being discharged on 6 November 2002. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071811C070403

    Original file (2002071811C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he separated from the service in the pay grade of E-7 and after a 9 ½ year break, again enlisted in the Regular Army in the pay grade of E-6. In the processing of the applicant’s application to the Board, the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) provided an advisory opinion to the Board, which opined, in effect, that under Army Regulation 140-158, a subsequent contractual reentry into the USAR will not authorize grade restoration. While he is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005580

    Original file (20070005580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank (DOR) for staff sergeant (SSG/E-6) be adjusted from 5 October 2006 to 16 June 2001. While the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) was reviewing the issue of reinstating his rank to sergeant first class (SFC/E-7), he had asked the Board to also review his DOR for SSG/E-6. It states, in pertinent part, that on enlistment in the Regular Army following discharge from the USAR, the DOR of the enlistment grade is the same...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016275

    Original file (20080016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to SSG on 1 September 2002. He was accordingly scheduled to attend BNCOC; however, due to his surgery, he requested a deferment in July 2003 of his August 2003 BNCOC class. However, he provided no evidence to show he informed anyone between November 2003 and August 2004 (when he deployed) that he was medically cleared to attend BNCOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003056C070205

    Original file (20060003056C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he believes that three officer evaluation reports (OER) ending on 28 June 1991, 25 September 1992 and 16 April 1993 were not properly reviewed by the appropriate promotion selections boards which resulted in his promotions being delayed. It provides, in pertinent part, that standby boards are formed to prevent an injustice to an officer or former officers who were eligible for promotion but whose records contained a material error when reviewed by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060001277C070205

    Original file (AR20060001277C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    David Tucker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained in the form of a service computation made by officials of the Human Resources Command – Alexandria, which indicates that the applicant was not credited with 19 days of active duty performed while assigned to the National Guard and thus his BASD was adjusted to 19 July 1985. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001688

    Original file (20090001688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case, on 17 March 2009, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), which explains that the applicant's DOR as a Reserve Component (RC) MAJ was 3 April 1998, which made him eligible for promotion to the rank of LTC on 2 April 2005, based on the 7-year time in grade requirement. The applicant's orders specified that his DOR would be adjusted to the date he entered active duty, which directly affected his promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008409

    Original file (20140008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Entry Grade Credit consists of prior commissioned service (including active duty for training (ADT) and commissioned service in an active status in the RC, and CSC). The evidence of record shows the applicant was - * promoted to CPT (O-3) with a DOR of 1 September 2004 * appointed as a Chaplain in the NHARNG and ARNGUS on 1 March 2010 with his CPT DOR established as 1 March 2010 * appointed in the RA in the rank of CPT (Chaplain) on 22 August 2011 with his ADOR established as 1 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012314

    Original file (20110012314.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was eligible for promotion to CPT but his academic transcripts were not reviewed despite sending three sets of those transcripts * he provided his transcripts through the chain of command and to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * he had served as a first lieutenant (1LT) for 5 years, 3 of which were command time, and he had solid officer evaluation reports (OER) * he out-processed from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in June 1998 * his non-select memorandum...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003552

    Original file (20080003552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military service record shows he was appointed in the ARNG as an Armor officer, in the grade of 1LT/pay grade O-2, effective and with a DOR of 28 September 2006. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, with appointment in the ARNG of the United States, in the grade of 2LT, effective 8 August 1992. b. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned...