Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004639C070205
Original file (20060004639C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 September 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060004639


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Anderholm               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Maribeth Love                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Thomas Ray                    |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of
Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Air Medal.


2.  The applicant states he was wounded around 30 May 1969, evacuated to
Japan for medical treatment, and later treated at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

3.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 13 February 2006, from the
Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command; a letter, dated
19 September 2005, from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis,
Missouri; a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); a DA
Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record); hospital message orders for
reassignment of medical evacuees; and Letter Orders Number 06-10, dated 13
June 1969, for convalescent leave.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged errors which occurred
on
26 June 1970.  The application submitted in this case is dated 19 August
2005; however, the application was received in this office on 24 March
2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the
Air Medal.  There are no orders or other evidence authorizing this
decoration to the applicant.  In the absence of a proper award authority
for this decoration, the applicant may request award of the Air Medal under
the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code.  The
applicant has been notified by separate correspondence of the procedures
for applying for this decoration under Section 1130 and, as a result, they
will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

4.  The applicant enlisted on 28 June 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He
successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual
training (AIT) and was awarded MOS 67A (aircraft maintenance crewman) and
later awarded MOS 67N (helicopter mechanic).  He arrived in Vietnam on 31
October 1968.  He served as a security platoon guard assigned to
Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 11th Combat Aviation Combat
Battalion in Vietnam from 4 November 1968 through 12 January 1969.  He
served in MOS 67N as a helicopter mechanic assigned to the 173rd Assault
Helicopter Company in Vietnam from 13 January 1969 until he was
hospitalized and transferred to the United States on 13 June 1969 for
further medical treatment.  On 26 June 1970, the applicant was released
from active duty.

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal,
the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with
Device 1960, the Good Conduct Medal, one award of the Overseas Service Bar,
and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as
authorized awards.

6.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

7.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not
show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20
is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty
Roster.

8.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided an installation
clearance record which shows he was evacuated from Vietnam to the 106th
General Hospital; hospital reassignment orders; and orders which show he
was granted 30 days of convalescent leave on 13 June 1969 while assigned to
the Army hospital at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.  However, there is no evidence
his illness or injury was the result of hostile action.

9.  There are no service medical records available.

10.  Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

11.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award
of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to
Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units
during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,
U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965
to
28 March 1973.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the
Aircraft Crew Member Badge may be permanently awarded for successful
completion of formal AIT in career management field 67 MOSs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The documentation provided by the applicant does not show that he was
hospitalized as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  There is no
evidence of record which shows that the applicant was injured or wounded as
a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient
evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  The applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in
Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four
bronze service stars.

3.  The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was
awarded to all units which served in Vietnam.

4.  Evidence of record shows the applicant completed AIT in MOS 67A;
therefore, he is entitled to award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge and
correction of his DD Form 214 to show this badge.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 26 June 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant
to file a request for correction of any error expired on 25 June 1973.
Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's statute of
limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file based on the
fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple
Heart.

6.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
errors which do not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative
correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the Case
Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the
Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section
below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JA_____  _ML_____  _TR_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that administrative errors in the records of the
individual concerned should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests
that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the
individual concerned
to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze
service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit
Citation, and the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.



                                  ___James Anderholm____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060004639                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060919                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0018                                |
|3.                      |107.0000                                |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007191C070206

    Original file (20050007191C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was an observer/gunner and was wounded in action. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the Aircraft Crew Member Badge; b. by deleting the Air Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 July 1973; c. by adding award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017810C070206

    Original file (20050017810C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 September 1966 through 6 September 1969; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010432

    Original file (20060010432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her husband’s records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received during action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080844C070215

    Original file (2002080844C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 22 October 1970, shows entitlement to award of the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with a "Device." The applicant's discharge documents show entitlement to award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016776

    Original file (20090016776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The available evidence shows the applicant suffered a foot injury in the Republic of Vietnam on 13 September 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017271

    Original file (20080017271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that the FSM should be awarded the Purple Heart for being injured during a combat operation on 8 August 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 8 August 1970; b. deleting the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014830C070206

    Original file (20050014830C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to the following units: a. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069419C070402

    Original file (2002069419C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086884C070212

    Original file (2003086884C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. The applicant's military records show that he participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008747

    Original file (20070008747.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded twice in the Republic of Vietnam. There is no evidence in his service personnel records that show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. Evidence of records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.