RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        5 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060004213


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Gunlicks                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Michael Flynn                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Scott Faught                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request for a
second award of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart with
First Oak Leaf Cluster).

2.  In addition, the applicant requests, in effect, that the DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) administratively
reissued on
17 February 2006 be corrected to show the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal
(Dominican Republic) instead of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.  He
also requests the issuance of his awards and decorations, which are new
issues.

3.  The applicant states he is eligible for a second award of the Purple
Heart for wounds he received in combat to his right shoulder in March 1966.
 He also states that his updated DD Form 214 fails to show the time he
served in the Dominican Republic, which is clearly shown on his original DD
Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).

4.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letter,
dated
7 October 1975; a DVA clinical record, dated 5 June 1975; and page 2 of his
Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 22 March 1967.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were
summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number
AR20040008715, on 26 July 2005.

2.  The applicant provided a DVA letter, dated 7 October 1975, which states
he was granted service connected disability for residuals of a right
shoulder wound (10 percent).

3.  The applicant provided a DVA clinical record, dated 5 June 1975, which
states, in pertinent part, that he was “transferred to the Republic of
Vietnam where he received shrapnel wounds to his left neck and right
shoulder.”

4.  The applicant also provided page 2 of his Standard Form 89, dated 22
March 1967.  Item 32 (Have you had or have you been advised to have any
operations) on this form shows the applicant reported that “around 21 March
66 I received a piece of shrapnel from a hand grenade while in Vietnam.
(Right shoulder).  Shrapnel still in right shoulder.”

5.  The applicant’s submissions are new evidence which will be considered
by the Board.

6.  The applicant enlisted on 23 July 1964 for a period of 3 years.  He
served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam from 4 October 1965
through 1 October 1966.  On 21 July 1967, the applicant was released from
active duty.

7.  The applicant’s original DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service
Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
with Device 1960, the Parachutist Badge, the Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal (Dominican Republic), the Purple Heart, and one award of the Overseas
Service Bar as authorized awards.

8.  Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) General Orders Number
922, dated 29 March 1966, show the applicant received the Purple Heart for
wounds received in action on 23 February 1966.

9.  Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification
Record) shows he was wounded on 23 February 1966.  Item 41 (Awards and
Decorations) on his DA Form 20 shows entitlement to one award of the Purple
Heart.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster shows the applicant was wounded in
action on 23 February 1966.

10.  There are no orders for a second award of the Purple Heart in the
applicant’s service personnel records.

11.  A DD Form 214 was administratively reissued on 17 February 2006 which
shows the Purple Heart, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam
Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit
Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960, one
award of the Overseas Service Bar, the Air Medal, the Good Conduct Medal,
the Parachutist Badge, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Republic
of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge, the Expert
Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar, and the Sharpshooter
Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the
medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  The
regulation states that the bronze oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the
second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the
Purple Heart.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant received the Purple Heart for wounds received
in action on 23 February 1966.  Although the applicant contends that he was
also wounded in action in March 1966 in Vietnam, and he reported this on
his Standard Form 89 on 22 March 1967 (without indicating that the wound
was the result of enemy action), there are no orders for a second award of
the Purple Heart.  The DVA letter provided by the applicant does not show
that his right shoulder wound was the result of hostile action in Vietnam.
The Vietnam Casualty Roster shows he was wounded only on 23 February 1966.


2.  In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the
applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action
in March 1966 in Vietnam, the entry on his Standard Form 89 is not
sufficient as a basis for a second award of the Purple Heart.  Therefore,
there is insufficient evidence on which to base a second award of the
Purple Heart in this case.

3.  The applicant’s original DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Armed
Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in the Dominican Republic (i.e., the
Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Dominican Republic)).  However, when his
DD Form 214 was reissued on 17 February 2006, it appears the entry
“(Dominican Republic)” was left off of the Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal.  While the new entry appears to be technically correct, it would be
appropriate to correct the DD Form 214 issued on 17 February 2006 to show
he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Dominican Republic).


4.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records does not issue
medals.  The applicant may receive the awards shown on his DD Form 214 by
submitting a request in writing to the following address: National
Personnel Records Center, ATTN:  Army Medals, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis,
Missouri 63132-5100.  A copy of the DD Form 214 should be included with the
request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

JG_____  _MF_____  _SF____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation of partial relief.  As a result the Board
recommends that his DD Form 214 issued on 17 February 2006 be corrected to
show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Dominican
Republic).

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result the
Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the
applicant’s request for reconsideration of his request for a second award
of the Purple Heart.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this portion of the case are insufficient as a basis to amend the
decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20040008715, dated 26
July 2005.




                                  __James Gunlicks__________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060004213                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |20050726                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061005                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |100.0000                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]