Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003423C070205
Original file (20060003423C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        26 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060003423


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. John J. Wendland, Jr.         |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Marla J.N.Troup               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert Rogers                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. John G. Heck                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, 2 years and 8 months of reserve
service credit.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the U.S. Army did not fulfill its
contract with him because he did not receive a medical examination at the
time of his separation from active duty.  He also states, in effect, that
his medical records show that he began seeing a medical doctor at the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) shortly after his separation from the
Army.  He further states, in effect, that if he had received a medical
examination prior to his separation, his benefits may have started at that
time.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form),
dated 21 May 1982, subject:  Statement of Option Pertaining to Medical
Examination for Separation/Retirement; VA Form 21-6789 (Deferred Rating
Decision), dated 19 May 2004; VA Form 119 (Report of Contact), dated 7 June
2004; and Department of VA, VA Regional Office, Waco, Texas, case filing
(pertaining to the applicant), dated 26 October 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 22 July 1982; the date of his release from active duty.  The
application submitted in this case is dated 21 February 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the
U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 28 March 1979 for a period of 6 years and
entered active duty in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 3 years on 18
July 1979.  Upon completion of basic combat training and advanced
individual training, the applicant was awarded military occupational
specialty (MOS) 31J (Teletypewriter Repairman).  The applicant was
honorably separated from the RA on 22 July 1982 after serving on active
duty for a total of 3 years.
4.  The applicant's military service records contain a copy of
Headquarters,
573rd Personnel Service Company, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Orders 68-6,
dated 6 April 1982, and Orders 91-56, dated 7 May 1982.  These documents
show, in pertinent part, that the applicant was released from active duty
on
22 July 1982 and that his Military Selective Service Act obligation ended
on
27 March 1985.

5.  The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DA Form
664 (Service Member's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation
from the Veterans Administration), dated 20 May 1982.  Item 2 (Instructions
to Personnel Being Separated) of this document shows, in pertinent part,
that the applicant was informed "[y]ou are further advised that, if you do
not apply for compensation from the Veterans Administration by completing
VA Form 21-526e at the time of separation, you may do so at any time
thereafter, that, if you do intend to file, it is advisable to do so before
you leave the service as at that time your medical records are more easily
obtainable and action by the Veterans Administration on your claim will be
expedited thereby; and that filing VA Form 21-526e will in no way delay
your separation.  Item 3 of the document shows that the applicant placed
check marks next to the statements, "I have not filed application for such
compensation on VA Form 21-256e" and "I understand that I may file after I
separate from the Army."  Item 5 (Signature of Member Being Separated) of
this document also shows that the applicant affixed his signature to the
document.

6.  The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DA Form 31
(Request and Authority for Leave) which shows that the applicant departed
on terminal leave on 22 May 1982 and remained on leave through his
separation date of 22 July 1982.

7.  The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form
214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an
effective date of 22 July 1982.  This document shows that at time of his
separation from active duty the applicant completed 3 years of net active
service and had completed
3 months and 20 days of prior inactive service.  Item 29 (Dates of Time
Lost During This Period) contains the entry "800818-800822."  This document
also shows that the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group
(Reinforcement), Reserve Components, 9700 Page Boulevard, St. Louis,
Missouri  63132, and that his Reserve Obligation Termination Date was
27 March 1985.

8.  The applicant's military service records contain a copy of
Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, DARP-
AIR-R(N1) Orders D-03-021196, dated 27 March 1985.  This document shows, in
pertinent part, that the applicant was honorably discharged from the Ready
Reserve, effective 27 March 1985, based upon completion of his Military
Selective Service Act obligation.  This document also contains an
annotation at the bottom of the order that reads "[s]ubject being
discharged although assigned to this organization, is not present for duty.
 Discharge certificate and discharge orders are being mailed to last known
address this date, 19 April 1985."

9.  The applicant's military service records are absent documentation
related to his Health Treatment Records.

10.  In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of a DA
Form 2496, dated 21 May 1982, subject:  Statement of Option Pertaining to
Medical Examination for Separation/Retirement which shows, in pertinent
part, that the applicant indicated he did not desire a separation medical
examination.  This document also shows, that the doctor or physician
assistant indicated that a medical examination for the applicant's
separation was required.  The VA Form 21-6789, VA Form 119, and Department
of VA case file pertaining to the applicant show, in pertinent part, that
the applicant received a medical examination upon entry in the Army, that
there is no record of a separation medical examination, and that on 18
August 2005 the VA confirmed and continued denial of service connection for
the applicant's stomach condition and other medical conditions that he
claimed.

11.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) governs medical
fitness standards for enlistment, induction, and appointment of officers;
medical fitness standards for retention and separation, including
retirement; and physical profiles and medical examinations.  Chapter 8
(Medical Examinations - Administrative Procedures) provides general
administrative policies relative to military medical examinations and
requirements for periodic, separation, mobilization, and other medical
examinations.  Paragraph 8-23 (Separation and retirement examinations)
provides, in pertinent part, that Soldiers separating from the Army will
receive a separation medical examination if the Soldier requests it, or if,
on review of the medical records or a medical interview, a physician, a
physician assistant, or a nurse practitioner feels an examination is
appropriate.  Table 8-2 (Schedule of Separation Medical Examination)
provides, in pertinent part, that a medical examination is not required
upon expiration of term of active service (separation or discharge, less
that 20 years of service); however, a medical examination can be requested
by the Soldier in writing.  This document also provides, in pertinent part,
that a medical examination is required if, upon review of health record,
the evaluating physician or physician assistant at the servicing medical
treatment facility determines that, because of medical care received during
active service, medical examination will serve the best interests of the
Soldier and Government.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that he should be credited with 2
years and 8 months of reserve service because the U.S. Army did not fulfill
its contract by ensuring he received a medical examination prior to his
separation from active duty.  He also contends, in effect, that had he
received a separation medical examination, his medical benefits may have
started at that time.  However, the applicant provides insufficient
evidence in support of his claim.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served on active duty
for a period of 3 years.  The evidence of record also shows that he
completed
3 months and 20 days of inactive service prior to this period of active
duty.  The evidence of record further shows that the applicant fulfilled
his 6-year Military Selective Service Act obligation by serving 2 years, 8,
months, and 6 days in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) subsequent to
his release from active duty.  Consequently, the applicant's active and
inactive military service is properly documented in his military service
records.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to
show additional creditable reserve service.

3.  The evidence of record shows that on 20 May 1982 the applicant was
informed that it is advisable to apply for compensation from the VA at the
time of separation because his medical records would be more easily
obtainable and action by the Veterans Administration on his claim would be
expedited.  The evidence of record also shows that on 21 May 1982, the
applicant declined (in writing) a separation medical examination, despite a
determination by the reviewing medical official that the applicant undergo
a separation medical examination.  The evidence of record further shows
that on 22 May 1982, the applicant voluntarily departed his unit on
terminal leave and remained on leave through the date of his separation
from active duty.  In essence, the applicant declined a separation medical
examination in writing, chose to ignore the medical official's
recommendation to undergo a separation medical examination by departing
from his unit on terminal leave the day following the medical official's
recommendation, and willingly foreclosed on his opportunity to receive a
separation medical examination by remaining on leave through the date of
his separation from active duty.  In view of all the foregoing, and despite
being advised of the benefits of undergoing a separation medical
examination and the timely submission of applying for compensation from the
VA prior to separation, by his own actions the applicant materially and
directly contributed to any delay that may have resulted with respect to
his post-service medical benefits.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 22 July 1982; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on
21 July 1985.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_MJNT___  ___RR__  __JGH __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____Marla J.N.Troup_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060003423                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061026                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19820722                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200, Chapter 2                   |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Completion of Required Service          |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |135.0100.0000                           |
|2.                      |124.0000.0000                           |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017582C070206

    Original file (20050017582C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    An original VA Form 21-526e is filed in the applicant’s personnel records. Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry, “PHYSICAL DISABILITY WITH SEVERANCE PAY.” He had completed 3 months and 5 days of creditable active service and 5 months and 29 days of service for pay. An error might have been made, in that an original VA Form 21-526e is filed in the applicant’s personnel records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000741

    Original file (20090000741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (1) The VA award letters, rating decisions, and rating code sheet, in pertinent part, show the applicant’s degenerative joint disease lumbosacral spine service-connected condition is rated 20-percent disabling and that he received an overall or combined evaluation of 30 percent from the VA. (2) The applicant’s SMR, in pertinent part, document the applicant’s symptoms, diagnoses, and treatments pertaining to his lower back pain (LBP) and, in particular, contain the following documents: (a) a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009608

    Original file (20080009608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the examination the applicant stated that the mass had been present since he was 3 years old and the physician noted that he was not sure if the mass could be removed. The applicant's Report of Medical History, dated 25 June 1975, shows that at the time of his examination, the applicant stated that he had two operations on his neck. It states, in pertinent part, that individuals who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for induction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000893

    Original file (20070000893.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was permanently retired from the military by reason of physical disability. Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. The medical evidence of record supports the determination that the applicant's unfitting condition was properly diagnosed and rated at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000113

    Original file (20140000113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and his counsel contend that the applicant's military records should be corrected to show he was diagnosed with unfitting conditions that were incurred during military service and are combat-related, and that he was placed on the PDRL with a disability rating of at least 30-percent. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant's medical conditions (individually or in combination) were medically unfitting for retention under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001891C070208

    Original file (20040001891C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB concluded, “based on a review of the objective medical evidence of record” that the applicant’s medical and physical impairment, which were rated at 10 percent, prevented reasonable performance of the duties required by his grade and military specialty. The evidence available to the Board indicates that all of the applicant’s medical conditions were considered during his disability processing, but only his PTSD and major depressive disorder were determined to render him unfit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506129C070209

    Original file (9506129C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he should have been medically retired from the military when he was released from active duty in 1991. He states that he is suffering from medical conditions (right ankle and shoulder pain and asthma) for which he received treatment while on active duty. It appears that the applicant was a member of the Army Reserve following his release from active duty and underwent several periodic medical examinations; all of which found him medically qualified for continued service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011901

    Original file (20080011901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011901 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, the evidence of record provides no evidence to suggest the applicant was suffering from a disabling mental or medical condition at the time of discharge that would have supported his separation processing through medical channels.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003880

    Original file (20080003880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This examination report gives no indication that the applicant suffered from a mentally or physically disabling condition that would have warranted his separation processing through medical channels. The evidence of record contains no indication that the head injury the applicant suffered disqualified him from further active duty service, or that it was sufficiently disabling to support his processing through the Army's PDES at the time of his discharge processing, as evidenced by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086420C070212

    Original file (2003086420C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Medical records, which she submits with her request, show that she was treated for right knee and thigh pain in April 1980, and in May of that year was diagnosed with chondromalacia, a softening of the articular cartilage.