RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 August 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002872
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. William D. Powers | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member |
| |Ms. Karmin S. Jenkins | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that on 8 May 1943, his tank destroyer was
demolished by enemy fire – one round entering just to the rear of his
position as tank commander.
3. The applicant provides his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating
decision, a statement from his former commander, and his Combat Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) partial denial.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
30 November 1965, the date of his release from active duty for years of
service. The application submitted in this case is dated 7 February 2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Army
National Guard and entered on active duty on 10 March 1941.
4. The applicant served in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of
Operations and was promoted to First Sergeant. He was honorably released
from active duty due to demobilization on 14 October 1945. The separation
document he was issued shows that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal and
the Bronze Star Medal. It also shows that he served in the Tunisia, Naples-
Foggia, Rome-Arno, Rhineland, and Central Europe campaigns. Item 34 of his
separation document, Wounds Received in Action, has “None” entered.
5. The applicant’s military records are remarkably complete. However,
there are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding
him the Purple Heart and there is no mention of him being wounded.
6. In the statement from the applicant’s former commander, he stated that
while the applicant was engaged in enemy fire on 8 May 1943, his tank
destroyer was destroyed.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Purple
Heart.
2. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was
wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action.
3. The statement from the applicant’s former commander only states that
the applicant’s tank destroyer was destroyed in combat. He did not say
that the applicant was wounded.
4. The Board notes that the applicant has not stated that he was wounded
in action. He only states that his tank destroyer was destroyed by enemy
fire.
5. In summary, the applicant’s separation document states that he was not
wounded in action; his separation document does not show the award of the
Purple Heart; the applicant’s remarkably complete military records do not
contain any evidence or indication that the applicant was wounded or
awarded the Purple Heart; and neither the applicant nor his commander state
that the applicant was wounded. As such, there is insufficient
documentation in which to award the applicant the Purple Heart.
6. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1965, the date of his
release from active duty. Therefore, the time for the applicant to file a
request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 November
1968. Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's statute of
limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file in this case
based on the fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award
of the Purple Heart.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jcr___ ___wdp__ ____ksj__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_______William D. Powers_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060001605 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20060831 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100679C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation) be corrected to show two awards of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster), the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018545
The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record confirms the applicant received an injury as the result of enemy action in the European theater on 12 October 1944 as annotated on his WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for injuries received due to hostile action in the European theater on 12 October...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03092669C070212
That form does not show award of the Purple Heart, nor that he was wounded in action. There is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart for her deceased husband. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded, the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device, the World War II Victory Medal, the Army of Occupation Medal with "Germany" clasp, the American...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004168
He feels that the injury to his knee was a direct result of hostile action which should entitle him to the Purple Heart. However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005703C071029
The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the ETO. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action in Northern France in September 1944 and showing his entitlement to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070457C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records, but only as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016666C071029
James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010951
The applicant requests, correction of his Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge (WD AGO Form 53-55) to show award of two Purple Hearts for wounds received during World War II, campaign credit for duty in Okinawa and Korea, and completion of tank destroyer training school. The applicant's military records are not available for review. There is no available evidence to show that the applicant attended tank destroyer training or that the reason and authority for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065867C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016783
His DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in action, and his service record is void of orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that show the hospital commander awarded him the Purple Heart. With respect to the applicant's argument that other Soldiers received the Purple Heart as a result of friendly accidents, the ABCMR decides cases on the evidence of record and each case is considered on its own merits.