RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002159
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | |Senior Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Patrick McGann | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. David Gallagher | |Member |
| |Mr. Roland Venable | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his time in the stockade be
counted in his overall military service time.
2. The applicant states his time in the stockade was not added to his
overall military time. He states it was at least 8 or 9 additional months
out of his life. In separate correspondence he notes he was confined two
separated times at Fort Riley, Kansas.
3. The applicant also notes that he had a hearing problem before he came
into the military and should never have been in the Army. He also suggests
that he was never paid.
4. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his
request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 15 June 1971. The application submitted in this case is
dated
24 January 2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted and
entered active duty on 19 May 1969. His induction physical examination
does note a slight hearing problem, but did not result in a permanent
physical profile and did not preclude his being found medically qualified
for induction.
4. Approximately 14 days later, on 3 June 1969, the applicant departed
AWOL (absent without leave) and was subsequently dropped from the rolls of
the Army.
5. The applicant returned to military control on 1 October 1969 and was
apparently placed in confinement at Fort Riley, Kansas. On 28 December
1969 he again departed AWOL, was dropped from the rolls, and returned to
military control on 13 April 1971.
6. Upon his return to military control following his second period of AWOL
he was again placed in confinement at Fort Riley, Kansas. On 15 June 1971
the applicant was discharged under other than honorable condition in lieu
of being tried by court-martial.
7. The applicant's separation document shows 5 months and 27 days of
creditable service which would have included his initial 14 days of service
between the date of his induction and his first period of AWOL, his
approximately 2 months in confinement at Fort Riley between 1 October 1969
and
27 December 1969 and his second period of confinement following his return
to military service in April 1971 and his discharge on 15 June 1971. He
had more than 500 days of lost time.
8. There were no pay records available to the Board.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's separation document does show creditable service for
the applicant's two periods of confinement while at Fort Riley.
2. While the applicant may have had a hearing problem at the time of his
induction it was not severe enough to warrant a permanent profile, nor did
it preclude his being found medically qualified for induction.
3. There were no pay records available to the Board and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary it is presumed the applicant was paid
appropriately for the limited amount of service with which he was credited.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.
5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 15 June 1971; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on
14 June 1974. The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___PM __ __DG ___ ___RV __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____Patrick McGann________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060002159 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20061011 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |110.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008233
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge and correction of his records as follows: a. correction of entries pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969 and 1 May 1969 to 13 June 1969), in Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); b. correction of an entry pertaining to lost time (4 April 1969 to 7 April 1969), in Item 44 (Lost Time) of his DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); c. correction of the entry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064297C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct (fraudulent entry, conviction by civil court, and absence without leave or desertion).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084845C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no indication in the available records that the applicant suffered from any psychological disorders at the time of discharge. The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066391C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Although there is no evidence, in available records, regarding disciplinary actions following this last period of AWOL, the applicant's records do indicate that he was confined from 8 December 1969 through 3 March 1970 when he was assigned as a duty soldier at Fort Riley, Kansas and promoted to pay grade E-2. Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, noted that a general...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711121
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004196
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004196 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Senator states, in effect, that the applicant served honorably in the Republic of Vietnam for 7 months prior to his return to the United States on rest and recuperation leave. Army Regulation 630-10 (Absence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068225C070402
In support of his application, the applicant submitted copies of his honorable discharges, DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Immunization records, and a letter to his congressman requesting help in getting his discharge upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 6 months, and 2 days of honorable military service and 12 months of Vietnam service from 15 January 1969 thru 14 January 1970. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083515C070212
APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for an upgrade of his Undesirable Discharge to an Honorable Discharge. The applicant failed to return to Vietnam and was reported as being AWOL effective 4 December 1969. On 20 April 1971, the applicant was advised that proceedings to discharge him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness were being initiated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608830C070209
The first specification covered the period the applicant was AWOL from Fort Ord, 7 September-18 October 1971 and the second specification was for an AWOL period 21-22 October (1 day) from Fort Leonard Wood. Accordingly, on 19 October 1972 the applicant was discharged while in an AWOL status after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 15 days of active military service and accruing 121 days of time lost. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106958C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 January 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004106958 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by...