Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002025C070205
Original file (20060002025C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        31 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060002025


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William Powers                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Karmin Jenkins                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his secondary military occupational
specialty (SMOS) of 52B20 (Generator Mechanic) be added to his DD Form 214
(Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he had a SMOS of 52B20 which is not listed on his
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his
application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 21 May 1976.  The application submitted in this case is dated
21 January 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 October 1973.  He
completed basic training and was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas for advanced
individual training.  At the successful completion of AIT, he was awarded
primary MOS 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).

4.  The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II)
shows he was a student at Fort Hood, Texas in duty MOS 52B.

5.  The applicant’s Enlisted Efficiency Report for the period covering June
1974 through May 1975 shows his SMOS as 52B20.

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 21 May 1976.  He completed
2 years, 7 months, and 6 days of active military service.

7.  Item 17a (Secondary Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214
shows the entry “None.”


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s Enlisted Efficiency Report shows his SMOS as 52B20.
Although there are no orders, this document is accepted as sufficient to
show he was awarded MOS 52B20.

2.  There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant’s SMOS 52B
was withdrawn.  As a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend his
DD Form 214 to reflect his SMOS 52B20 (Generator Mechanic).

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 21 May 1976; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 20 May 1979.   The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence, it would
be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this
case.

BOARD VOTE:

WP______  JR______  KJ______  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing the entry “52B20 Generator
Mechanic” in item 17a on his DD Form 214.




                            William Powers________
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060002025                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060831                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0500                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015295C070206

    Original file (20050015295C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded 94B as his PMOS and 52B was changed to his SMOS per his request. Therefore, there is no error or injustice and no basis for correction of the applicant's DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023455

    Original file (20110023455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Item 6 (MOS) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows his PMOS as 76D and his SMOS as 67N. Since he held the SMOS of 67N at the time of separation, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this MOS, title, and the date awarded in item 17a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023508

    Original file (20110023508.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 26 July 1976, to show he completed the SAM 31, Small Arms Organization Maintenance, as his secondary military occupational specialty (SMOS). The applicant states the training was given on 29 August 1975 by the Seventh Army Combined Arms Training Center in Germany and it does not appear on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000973

    Original file (20120000973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to lists items 16a (Primary Specialty Number and Title) and 17a (Secondary Specialty Number and Title) in sequence. The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * Certificate of Appreciation * Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) letter dated 1 June 2011 * DD Form 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008514C070205

    Original file (20060008514C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he earned the MOS of 95B and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he was a military policeman. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which occurred on 28 September 1973, the date of his discharge. Item 38 (Record of Assignment), of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows he served as a military policeman, in MOS 95B4O, from 11 August 1971 to 9 July 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017795

    Original file (20110017795.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record clearly shows he did not serve in PMOS 11C1O as shown in item 16a of his DD Form 214. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct item 16a of his DD Form 214 to show PMOS 11B1O and the evaluation score he received in that MOS (i.e., "none"). The evidence of record does not show, nor has the applicant provided evidence showing, he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017179

    Original file (20080017179.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, his records do not show any derogatory information throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. With respect to the applicant’s MOS, the evidence of record shows that he was initially awarded PMOS 63B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004691

    Original file (20120004691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his primary specialty title and number as "71T2O Equipment Maintenance Clerk" instead of "76D Automotive Repairman." His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties), shows PMOS 71T was deleted on an unknown date (but possibly on 1 March 1976 as a result of an MOS conversion). Since the available evidence shows he did not hold MOS 71T at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012793

    Original file (20060012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the entries at Item 11 (Primary Specialty) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected. The records show the applicant entered active duty on 16 February 1973, completed training, and was awarded the MOS 11B. Item 11, on the 28 February 1995 DD Form 214, shows service in MOS 11B5O of 0 years and 0 months and in MOS 63B5O of 17 years and 2 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028667

    Original file (20100028667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). * Item 6a shows "SP4" * Item 6b shows "E4" * Item 7 shows "76-03-05" * Item 17a shows "NA" * Item 17b shows "NA" * Item 26 shows "National Defense Service Medal" 6. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).