Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002016C070205
Original file (20060002016C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        24 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060002016


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Jeanette McCants              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Scott Faught                  |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Rowland Heflin                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the separation code on his DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed so he can
keep the enlistment bonus he was given.

2.  The applicant states he was never informed that the money given was to
be paid back.  He states that he was graciously allowed to end his military
career to help take care of his mother, who was diagnosed with cancer in
August 2005.  He also states he did not have any disciplinary problems and
was given an honorable discharge.  He has no financial assistance and
wishes to be free of this debt.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and his DFAS-DE Form 0-641
(Statement of Military Pay Account).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 27 March 2003 under
the delayed entry program (DEP).  His Statement for Enlistment shows he
enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 98H (Morse
Interceptor).

2.  The applicant’s Statement of Enlistment shows he enlisted for the U.S.
Army Incentive Enlistment Program for a cash bonus in the amount of $9,000.


3.  His Statement of Understanding-United States Army Incentive Program
Enlistment Program indicates he acknowledged and understood that he was
enlisting for an incentive of a cash bonus in the amount of $9,000.  Item 4
(Statement and Conditions) states, “I must stay qualified in my incentive
MOS for the duration of my initial enlistment, unless otherwise directed by
Headquarters, Department of the Army.”

4.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 August 2003 for a
period
of 6 years.  He completed basic training and advanced individual training
and was awarded MOS 98H.

5.  The applicant’s Service School Academic Evaluation Report (DA Form
1059) shows he completed the required training and was awarded MOS 96B
(Intelligence Analyst) in May 2005.

6.  The applicant underwent a mental status evaluation on 22 August 2005.
The psychiatrist stated the applicant had a longstanding pattern of
maladaptive coping skills making him unsuitable for continued military
service and recommended separation under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, paragraph 5-13 for personality disorder, and a bar to
reenlistment.

7.  The unit commander notified the applicant of pending separation action
under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 for
personality disorder, date unknown.  The unit commander stated that the
applicant was diagnosed as having a character and behavior disorder as
outlined in Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 and described in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) of Mental Disorders, 4th
Edition.  The unit commander stated that the extent of the disorder was so
severe that the applicant’s ability to function effectively in a military
environment was significantly impaired.  The applicant was advised of his
rights.

8.  The applicant acknowledged notification of the separation action,
consulted legal counsel, and did not submit statements in his own behalf.

9.  On an unknown date, the separation authority directed that the
applicant be separated from the service prior to the expiration of his
current term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
paragraph 5-13 with issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

10.  The applicant was discharged on 13 September 2005 under the provisions
of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 for personality disorder with an
honorable discharge.  He served 2 years and 23 days total active military
service.

11.  Item 26 (Separation Code) on his DD Form 214 shows a Separation
Program Designator (SPD) code of "JFX" (Personality Disorder).

12.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 shows the
narrative reason as "PERSONALITY DISORDER."

13.  The applicant’s Statement of Military Pay Account covering the period
1 to 13 September 2005 shows $4,592.13 of his enlistment bonus was
recouped.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific
authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for
the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes
to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation, in effect at the
time, showed that the SPD code “JFX” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form
214 specified the narrative reason for separation as involuntary release or
transfer for “Personality Disorder” and that the authority for separation
under this separation program designator was “AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-13."


15.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier
may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability
under Army Regulation 635-40 that interferes with assignment to or
performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a
deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that
interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty.  The regulation also
directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in Chapter 5 in
lieu of disciplinary action.  The service of a Soldier separated per this
paragraph will be characterized as honorable unless an entry level
separation is required under chapter 3, section III.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 27 March 2003.  His Statement of
Enlistment indicates he enlisted for training in MOS 98H and was authorized
entitlement to a cash bonus in the amount of $9,000.  At the time of his
enlistment, he acknowledged that he would remain qualified in his incentive
MOS for the duration of his initial enlistment.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant reclassified into MOS 96B in
May 2005.

3.  The applicant was separated from active duty on 13 September 2005 under
the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13 based on
personality disorder.

4.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in
compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural
errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects he was separated with a
separation code of "JFX" in accordance with the governing regulation in
effect at the time.

6.  It appears that the applicant’s enlistment bonus was recouped due to
his discharge from active duty.  Since he did not remain qualified in his
incentive MOS for the duration of his initial enlistment, there is no basis
for changing his separation code so he can keep the enlistment bonus.

7.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the
evidence of record that the narrative reason given to his was in error or
unjust.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JM______  SF______  RH______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  Jeanette McCants______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060002016                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060824                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |110.0200                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010360C070208

    Original file (20040010360C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Her Record of Military Processing (DD Form 1966 series) shows that she recertified her enlistment in MOS 98C; however, DD Form 1966/4, Section VI, Remarks, shows that the statement, “I understand that I will be trained in either MOS 98CL or 98GL and that MOS 98Xl is an enlistment MOS only. On 15 October 2003 action was taken to separate the applicant from the Army because of her personality disorder, and on 12 November 2003...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008382

    Original file (20060008382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. On 6 May 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), chapter 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. Based on the Army G-1 opinion and the in the interest of justice, it would now be appropriate to correct the record to show that applicant requested and was granted a waiver of recoupment of his unearned portion of his bonus incentive prior to his discharge from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061836C070421

    Original file (2001061836C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he is authorized an enlistment bonus of $14,000 plus interest. The Board agrees with the applicant that he made a contract in good faith with the government that he would enlist for 4 years in the Regular Army for training in MOS 88M with the understanding that the government would pay him bonuses totaling $14,000. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017904C070206

    Original file (20050017904C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Peguine Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s DA Form 3286-59 (Statement of Enlistment) shows he enlisted for the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program for a cash bonus in the amount of $5,000. His Statement of Enlistment indicates he enlisted for training in MOS 68S and was authorized entitlement to a cash bonus in the amount of $5,000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014208

    Original file (20080014208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, the reason for his separation is incorrect and his discharge has been classified as service connected because of an adjustment disorder by the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). The examining psychiatrist strongly recommended that the applicant be separated expeditiously because he met the criteria in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-13, administrative separation for personality disorder. On 29 January 2007, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023422

    Original file (20110023422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 5-13, Personality Disorder. Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder, not amounting to disability under Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), that interferes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021601

    Original file (20110021601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge) on 30 March 2000 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct (pattern of misconduct). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty. The letters submitted on behalf of the applicant fail to show his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006091

    Original file (20080006091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 NOVEMBER 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006091 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His enlistment contract shows that he enlisted for a period of 4 years and 16 weeks for the United States Army Training Enlistment Program and the United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program (U.S. Army Cash Bonus, 4-Year Enlistment, Critical Shortage Accession Bonus). The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 4 is the applicable RE code assigned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002661C070206

    Original file (20050002661C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his enlistment contract to show he is authorized an enlistment bonus. The applicant's DD Form 1966/3 indicated he was authorized a cash bonus of $3,000 per DA Message 120730Z November 1998. Based on the advisory opinion provided by the Chief of the Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, there was a $3,000 seasonal bonus in effect on the date of the applicant's enlistment in November 1998 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021646

    Original file (20090021646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021646 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that on 12 March 2007 he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)...