Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001971C070205
Original file (20060001971C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        28 September 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001971


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Paul M. Smith                 |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Alice Muellerweiss            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be allowed to retain all the monies he
received for military service from 12 December 2003 though 10 February
2004.

2.  The applicant states he was erroneously called up to go to Iraq when
his records should have shown that he had been discharged in April 2002.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 22 April 2002; his
Honorable Discharge certificate dated 22 April 2002; a 20 December 2004
letter from Headquarters,  U. S. Army Reserve Command; a letter of
indebtedness from the U. S. Department of the Treasury; active duty orders
dated 18 December 2003; release from active duty orders dated 6 February
2004; Headquarters, 88th Regional Readiness Command (RRC) Orders 04-336-
00040 dated 1 December 2004; and a 1 December 2004 letter from an unknown
agency (but probably Headquarters, U. S. Army Reserve Command) to the
applicant.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 18 February
1999.  He served on initial active duty for training from 16 March 1999
through
30 August 1999.  On 24 August 2001, he requested enlistment in the Regular
Army.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 September 2001.  On 22 April
2002, he was honorably discharged due to physical condition, not a
disability.  He was erroneously assessed into the Individual Ready Reserve,
and, on           4 December 2003, he was erroneously assigned to a Troop
Program Unit (TPU) within the 88th RRC.

2.  On orders dated 18 December 2003, the applicant was “ordered to Active
Duty as a member of your Reserve Component unit” for 545 days.  Orders
dated 6 February 2004 released the applicant from active duty effective 7
February 2004.

3.  The 88th RRC apparently issued orders dated 19 November 2004
discharging the applicant from the USAR effective 10 February 2004.  After
discovering that the applicant had been discharged from the USAR in April
2002, the 88th RRC revoked its 19 November 2004 orders.  The U. S. Army
Human Resources Command – St. Louis then corrected its records to show he
had been discharged on 22 April 2002.

4.  The applicant has been charged with a debt (for “erroneously” received
pay and allowances for the period from on or about 4 December 2003 to on or
about 10 February 2004) in the amount of approximately $1,069.98.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative
Separations), paragraph 5-3 (Secretarial plenary authority) states that
separation under this paragraph is the prerogative of the Secretary of the
Army.  Ordinarily, it is used when no other provision of this regulation
applies and early separation is clearly in the best interest of the Army.

6.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), paragraph
14-1, (Secretarial plenary authority) states that separation under this
paragraph is the prerogative of the Secretary of the Army.  Ordinarily, it
is used when no other provision of this regulation applies and early
separation is clearly in the best interest of the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After the applicant’s 22 April 2002 discharge for having a physical
condition, not a disability, he was erroneously placed in the Individual
Ready Reserve.  Based upon this error, the applicant was further
transferred to a TPU for mobilization in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom
effective 4 December 2003.  He was then ordered to active duty effective 3
January 2004.

2.  The error was discovered shortly after the applicant entered active
duty.  He was released from active duty effective 7 February 2004, and he
was discharged from the USAR effective 10 February 2004.  However, the
discharge orders were later revoked (properly, as technically he never had
a military status from which to be discharged).  Unfortunately, the
revocation of those orders resulted in a “debt” to the Government, even
though he actually performed service.

3.  The applicant’s records should be corrected to show he enlisted in the
USAR on 4 December 2003; to show he performed active duty from 3 January
2004 through 7 February 2004, at which time he was honorably released from
active duty by reason of Secretarial Authority; to show he was transferred
to the USAR effective 8 February 2004; and to show he was honorably
discharged from the USAR effective 10 February 2004 by reason of
Secretarial Authority.

BOARD VOTE:

__lds___  __pms___  __am____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  showing he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve on 4 December 2003;

     b.  showing he performed active duty from 3 January 2004 through 7
February 2004, and he was honorably released from active duty by reason of
Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,
paragraph 5-3;

     c.  showing he was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve effective 8
February 2004;

     d.  showing he was honorably discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve
effective 10 February 2004 by reason of Secretarial Authority under the
provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 14-1; and

     e.  paying to him all pay and allowances due as a result of the above
correction.




                                  __Linda D. Simmons____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060001971                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060928                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |112.00                                  |
|2.                      |110.00                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002479C070205

    Original file (20060002479C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he should have been promoted to CPT during the September 2004 position vacancy board, but he was not promoted because his unit improperly placed him in the new TTHS (Trainee, Transient, Holdee, and Student) account. USAR position vacancy promotion consideration to fill a TPU position vacancy is authorized (1) when the Commander, USAHRC – St. Louis notifies a TPU commander that no qualified Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) officer of the authorized grade is geographically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001832

    Original file (20150001832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 10 January 2003, she received her promotion order. The show cause board stated there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he requested to be relieved from his command and/or failed to prepare his command for mobilization during a crucial time; however, the OSRB did find evidence of a clear and convincing nature that he did request to be removed from command by saying he could not serve for his commanders. Contrary to counsel's contention that the show cause board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007586

    Original file (20130007586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was recommended for promotion to master sergeant by the August 2007 Senior Enlisted Promotion Board and integrated onto the PPRL managed by the 88th RRC. There is no evidence the applicant was placed in an E-8 position or that orders were published promoting him to pay grade E-8. c. Paragraph 5-44f of Army Regulation 600-8-19 states before submitting removal action, commanders will promptly advise the convening authority of any Soldier whose name appears on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014250

    Original file (20090014250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 30 April 2008, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) corrected his DOR to captain (CPT) from 25 June 1998 to 25 June 1997. ABCMR Docket Number AR20080000528, dated 29 April 2008, approved the applicant's request to adjust his DOR to CPT from 25 June 1998 to 9 June 1997, thereby making him eligible for promotion consideration to MAJ one year earlier. Therefore, in the interest of equity and justice, it would be appropriate to adjust the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019181

    Original file (20100019181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be placed in the Retired Reserve to allow for continued payment of his earned Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) benefit. The applicant states, in effect: * the FSM was recruited into the active Reserve, from the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), around September 2002 * the FSM informed the Army of the fact he was receiving VSI,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020836

    Original file (20090020836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As relates to the issues raised in the subject OER, the board found there was insufficient evidence to show he: * displayed poor judgment and an inability to make decisions * demonstrated a lack of interpersonal and managerial skills in coordinating the actions of his officers and NCOs during mobilization * requested relief from his command * failed to prepare his command for deployment The board recommended he be retained in the Army and reassigned to a different unit. The board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003890

    Original file (20090003890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his 17 March 2006 discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date in lieu of being discharged. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that each Reserve component Soldier who completes the service required to be eligible for retired pay at age 60 will be notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012708

    Original file (20090012708.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090012708 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that his promotion packet was erroneously removed from consideration by a position vacancy board (PVB). Although the regulation does not provide for promotion consideration by an SSB for erroneous non-consideration by a PVB, as matter of equity his DOR should be corrected to show 16 January 2008, the date of approval of the October 2007 PVB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005016

    Original file (20090005016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be updated as follows: a. removal of the following documents from his OMPF: (1) DA Forms 5248-R (Report of Unfavorable Information for Security Determination), dated 17 and 22 October 2002; (2) DA Forms 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Actions (flag)), dated 12 December 2002 and 8 February 2003; and (3) General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 March 2004. b. reinstatement of his security...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010700

    Original file (20060010700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records show the ARNG transferred the applicant to the IRR instead of discharging him. The branch manager also stated that based on the fact that the Soldier was never actually discharged and was transferred into the IRR instead, per Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 5-53, enlisted members may receive a medical waiver for enlistment provided they can show that their physical condition has improved to meet retention criteria. On 18 August 2006, the CAARNG issued the applicant a...