Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000804C070205
Original file (20060000804C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        15 August 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060000804


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Shirley Powell                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Rose Lys                      |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. John Heck                     |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of
Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal
but not the Purple Heart.  He contends that he discovered the error when
applying for benefits, that he has the medal, and that he would like the
error corrected.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his
application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 28 January 1970.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 6 January 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted on 29 January 1968.  He arrived in Vietnam
on
20 April 1969.  He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to
Company D, 1st Battalion, 77th Armor of the 1st Brigade in Vietnam from 28
April 1969 until he was hospitalized on 14 August 1969 and transferred to
the United States on
9 September 1969 for further medical treatment.  On 28 January 1970, the
applicant was released from active duty in the temporary rank of specialist
four after completing 2 years of creditable active service with no time
lost.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal
and the Vietnam Service Medal as authorized awards.

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not
show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20
is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty
Roster.

7.  A service medical record, dated 12 January 1970, shows the applicant
fractured his right femur on 8 August 1969 in Vietnam.  However, there is
no evidence which shows this injury was the result of hostile action.

8.  The applicant’s Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated
14 January 1970, shows he reported that he was wounded in Vietnam in August
1969 and that he fractured his right femur and hand.

9.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by
his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.  His records do
not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency
ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

10.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

11.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award
of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to
Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units
during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,
U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965
to
28 March 1973.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.

13.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and
criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the
Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted
active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and,
for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June
1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's
conduct and efficiency ratings must
have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service
except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic
proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was
not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal
until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award
and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant
was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
Contemporaneous medical evidence does not show that his fractured right
femur was the result of hostile action.  In the absence of orders or other
evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for
any wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the entry on his
Standard Form 89 which shows he was wounded in Vietnam is not sufficient as
a basis for an award of the Purple Heart.  Regrettably, there is
insufficient evidence on which to base any award of the Purple Heart in
this case.

2.  The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with 2 years
of creditable active service with no time lost.  Therefore, it appears the
applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal for the period 29 January 1968 through 28 January 1970 based
on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination
of a period of Federal military service.

3.  The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in
Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two
bronze service stars.

4.  The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was
awarded to all units which served in Vietnam.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 28 January 1970; therefore, the time for the
applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 27
January 1973.  Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's
statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file
based on the fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award
of the Purple Heart.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

SP_____  _RL____  JH______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by:


      a.  awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the
period 29 January 1968 through 28 January 1970; and

      b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal and to show
that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service
stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Purple Heart.



                            ____Shirley Powell____
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060000804                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060815                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0000                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003690

    Original file (20130003690.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a second Purple Heart. An undated newspaper article from an unknown source which appears to be a Hometown News Service release and which states the applicant: * left California for Vietnam on 18 October 1968 * was seriously wounded in Vietnam on 11 May 1969 * received emergency treatment in Vietnam and he was flown to Japan where he went through two major operations within the past week * was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001613C070206

    Original file (20050001613C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade General Orders Number 6271, dated 3 December 1969, announcing award of the Bronze Star Medal for Heroism to the applicant for actions on 24 June 1969; and, a certificate awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant for wounds received in Vietnam on 2 December 1968. There are no orders, or other form of evidence, in the applicant’s records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001613C070206

    Original file (20050001613C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade General Orders Number 6271, dated 3 December 1969, announcing award of the Bronze Star Medal for Heroism to the applicant for actions on 24 June 1969; and, a certificate awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant for wounds received in Vietnam on 2 December 1968. There are no orders, or other form of evidence, in the applicant’s records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016038

    Original file (20110016038.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on or about 23 August 1969; b. adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 7 May 1973 one bronze service star for wear on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03092681C070212

    Original file (03092681C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the award of the Purple Heart be reflected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device, the Bronze Star Medal, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012497

    Original file (20100012497.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he was informed at the time he was not entitled to the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds he incurred on 5 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004181

    Original file (20110004181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the FSM’s record of service, it appears that the FSM should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 10 December 1968 through 22 December 1970. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the FSM from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the FSM’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005407C070205

    Original file (20060005407C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for any wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the clinical record provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for an award of the Purple Heart. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208

    Original file (2004104598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017049

    Original file (20070017049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served 13 months in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. deleting from Item 26 of his DD Form 214 the Good Conduct Medal; and b. adding to Item 26 of this DD Form 214 the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award), Meritorious Unit...