Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016466C070206
Original file (20050016466C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        6 July 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050016466


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Eric Andersen                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Michael Flynn                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Dennis Phillips               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank be corrected from
private (pay grade E-2) to private first class (pay grade E-3).

2.  The applicant states his rank is erroneous on his DD Form 214 (Report
of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 1108 (Application for Replacement of
Separation Documents); two service medical records, dated 25 February 1958
and 17 December 1957; and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 28 May 1958.  The application submitted in this case is dated 1
November 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there
were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board
to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

4.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 26 June 1956.  He served as
a field artillery crewman and was released from active duty on 28 May 1958.


5.  Item 3 (Grade) on the applicant's DD Form 214, which was authenticated
in his own hand on 28 May 1958, shows the entry, “PVT E-2 (P).”

6.  There are no promotion orders in the available records which show the
applicant was advanced to private first class prior to his release from
active duty on 28 May 1958.

7.  The applicant provided two service medical records which show his rank
as private first class.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was a private E-2 at the time of
his release from active duty on 28 May 1958.  In the absence of promotion
orders to private first class, the medical records provided by the
applicant are not sufficient as a basis for amending item 3 on his DD Form
214 to show his rank as private first class.

2.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 28 May 1958; therefore, the time for the applicant
to file a request for correction of any error expired on 27 May 1961.  The
applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not
provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

EA_____  _MF_____  _DP_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of



limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the
individual concerned.






                                  ___Eric Andersen______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050016466                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060706                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |102.0200                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003093C070206

    Original file (20050003093C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003093 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. He was honorably discharged from the Army of the United States on 20 July 1952 in the rank of Sergeant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009457

    Original file (20130009457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, ending on 27 January 1958 * Special Orders (SO) Number 5, dated 8 January 1958 * Discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Letter Orders S01-2554, dated 28 December 1962 * Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 31 December 1962 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016764

    Original file (20100016764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 29 August 1952 through 29 August 1955. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006738

    Original file (20120006738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. There is no evidence of record available and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was promoted and/or served as a staff sergeant during his period of active duty. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005676

    Original file (20120005676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a DD Form 256 A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) in support of his request. The rank structure changed in 1958 and showed that members in the pay grade of E-4 held the rank title of SP4 which is the rank title the applicant held at the time of his discharge from the USAR in 1960.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017114

    Original file (20130017114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his Honorable Discharge Certificate and DD Form 214. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains correcting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009876

    Original file (20140009876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008660

    Original file (20110008660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his records be corrected to show he retired in the rank title of sergeant first class. The evidence of record shows that this was the rank and grade he held upon his retirement. The applicant has provided no evidence that there is an error in his official record that can be corrected.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006089C070208

    Original file (040006089C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 11 August 1961 honorable discharge certificate from the United States Army Reserve be corrected to show that his pay grade was E-7 and not E-6. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. On 16 September 1958, at the conclusion of the applicant’s 1955 service contract, an honorable discharge certificate was issued which indicated that the applicant was discharged in the rank of MSgt (master sergeant), grade E-7.