Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015826C070206
Original file (20050015826C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        20 July 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050015826


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Karl L. Briales               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Marla J. N. Troup             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. William F. Crain              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the award of the Purple Heart for an accident
while in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

2.  The applicant states while serving in the RVN he was accidentally hit
by a Corps of Engineer 10-ton front-end loader which caused injuries to his
hip and back.  The applicant continues that while being medevac'd, the
helicopter he was being transported in crashed in Japan further
complicating his injuries.

3.  The applicant states that his commander offered him award of the Purple
Heart after witnessing the bruises on his body, however, he refused the
award because of embarrassment.  The applicant further states that he would
like the Purple Heart he was offered in the RVN for use as priority on his
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits claim for injuries
received in the accident in the RVN.

4.  The applicant concludes that if he had accepted the Purple Heart the
waiting time of 54 years for his disability benefits would not have been
necessary.

5.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, his VA and civilian
medical records, 2 statements from friends and letters from previous
employers.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 25 October 1968, the date of his separation from active
duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 5 August 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's records show that he was inducted on 19 January 1967.
He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was
awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 76A10 (Supply Clerk).
The applicant was assigned to the 661st Ordnance Company while in the RVN
during the period 14 December 1967 through 15 October 1968.  The applicant
was honorably separated from active duty on 25 October 1968.

4.  Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214
(Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does
not show award of the Purple Heart.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification
Record) is blank.

6.  There are no medical records available in the applicant’s official
military personnel file that shows he was involved in an accident while in
the RVN.

7.  The applicant’s name does not appear on the Republic of Vietnam
Casualty Roster.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been
made a matter of official record.  This regulation also provides that there
are no time limitations or requests for awards of the Purple Heart.

9.  Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional
awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

10  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of
the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on
Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.

11.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units
serving in Vietnam.  This document shows the unit to which the applicant
was assigned, 661st Ordnance Company, was cited for award of the
Meritorious Unit Commendation based on Department of the Army General
Orders Number 31, dated 1969.

12.  The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service
Medal.  However, his DD Form 214 does not show any bronze service stars
indicating campaign credit.  His records indicate he participated in the
Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, IV, V, and the TET Counteroffensive.

13.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows the applicant
participated in four campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam.  This
same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear
on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is entitled award of the Purple Heart.

2.  There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the
Purple Heart.  There is no evidence in his service personnel records which
shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or
treated for such wounds.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam
Casualty Roster.  In the absence of such evidence, there is insufficient
basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case.

3.  General Orders show the applicant was awarded the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Meritorious Unit
Commendation which is not shown on his separation document.  Therefore, he
is entitled to correction of his records to show two foreign unit awards.

4.  Records show that the applicant participated in the four campaigns
during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of four
bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 25 October 1968; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
24 October 1971.  Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR’s
statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file
based on the fact there are no time limitations on requests for award of
the Purple Heart.

6.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__wdp___  __mjnt__  __wfc___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that it was appropriate to waive failure to timely
file in this case.

2.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned to show award of the Purple Heart.

3.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with
Palm Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation and four bronze service
stars for wear on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal.



                                        William D. Powers
                                  ______________________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050015826                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060720                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0094                                |
|3.                      |107.0034                                |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013987

    Original file (20090013987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of these decorations to the applicant. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that the applicant was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, ARCOM with first oak leaf cluster, Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, Air Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one bronze service star, and the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000425

    Original file (20100000425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The document provided clearly identifies the applicant and shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound that he received from a booby trap on 12 July 1968. c. Despite the absence of any additional evidence in the applicant's military personnel records, it is concluded that the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017422

    Original file (20090017422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart, Bronze Star Medal, and any other decorations to which he is entitled. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, three awards of the Bronze Star Medal, and all other decorations to which he is entitled.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013708

    Original file (20100013708.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DD Form 214 and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) in support of this application. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence on which to base awarding him the Purple Heart and adding this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action on 8 June 1968; b. awarding him the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077787C070215

    Original file (2002077787C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her husband, the deceased former service member's (FSM) records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. She states, in effect, that he was retired for physical disability and ultimately died of his service connected disabilities, but he was never awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007254

    Original file (20100007254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 2 April 1968, to show award of two Bronze Star Medals (BSM's) and the Purple Heart (2nd Award). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the same form shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by the authority of GO Number 119, dated 5 July 1967. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show award of two BSM's and the Purple Heart (2nd Award) was carefully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020518

    Original file (20120020518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his assignment to the RVN his unit was awarded: a. the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 3, dated 1970, for the period 1 September 1968 through 28 July 1969; and a second award based on DAGO Number 53, dated 1970, for the period 29 July 1969 through 17 November 1970; and b. the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017252

    Original file (20080017252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant requests that the Air Medal with 26 Oak Leaf Clusters, the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015656

    Original file (20090015656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant participated in five campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart and Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster for wounds received in action on 21 November 1968; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003192

    Original file (20110003192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal. The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in the RVN on 17 August 1968 * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding to his DD Form 214 the Army...