Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015259C070206
Original file (20050015259C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        8 AUGUST 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050015259


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Anderholm               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Dale DeBruler                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James Hastie                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 4-b (pay grade) on his
January 1994 separation document be corrected to show 0-3E vice 03 and that
his military identification card also be corrected to reflect that same pay
grade.  He also asks that his retired pay be recalculated accordingly.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served more than 12 years as
an enlisted Soldier and retired as a captain in 1994 after a total of more
than 20 years.  He states when he retired his separation document reflected
a pay grade of 0-3 vice 0-3E and as a result his retired pay was based on
the basic pay rate of an 0-3 vice and 0-3E.

3.  The applicant provides a statement indicating his retired pay is being
paid based on the pay grade 0-3 and has since his retirement in 1994.  He
also provides copies of his enlisted separation documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 31 January 1994.  The application submitted in this case
is dated
17 October 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant entered active
duty as an enlisted Soldier in June 1973 and served continuously in that
capacity until January 1986 when he was discharged and ordered to active
duty as a second lieutenant as a result of a direct appointment as a
commissioned officer.





4.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of captain in July 1990 and
retired for length of service on 31 January 1994 after a continuous
military career spanning approximately 20 years and 7 months.  Item 4-b on
his 1994 separation document reflects a pay grade of 0-3.  His Department
of Defense Form 2 (Retired Identification Card) reflects that same pay
grade.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5, which prescribes the policies and provisions for
the preparation of the Department of Defense Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) states that item 4 will reflect the
“active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.”

6.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation states that
effective 20 May 1958 commissioned officers in pay grades 0-1, 0-2, or 0-3,
who are credited with at least 4 years and 1 day of prior active service as
an enlisted member are entitled to the special rate of basic pay grade 0-
1E, 0-2E, or 0-3E.  In effect, such commissioned officers are entitled to
count such service for the purposes of computing basic pay for longevity
purposes.

7.  Service regulations which govern the preparation of the Department of
Defense Form 2 note that the official grade and rank will be entered in the
grade block on the retired identification card.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence confirms that the applicant had more than 4 years of active
enlisted service when he was ordered to active duty as a United States Army
Reserve officer and as such, at the time of his discharge he would have
been serving in the recognized pay grade of 0-3E.  His records should be
corrected accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

__JA____  __DD ___  __JH ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing he was serving in pay grade 0-
3E at the time of his release from active duty in January 1994.





                            ____ James Anderholm_______
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050015259                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060808                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002163C070206

    Original file (20050002163C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By regulation, the rank and pay grade held on the date of separation from active duty will be entered in Item 4 of the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held the rank and pay grade of MSG/E-8 on the date of his REFRAD for retirement. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his retirement, the applicant only had completed 22 years 10 months and 27 days of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002869C070208

    Original file (20040002869C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 MARCH 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040002869 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be correct to show that he now goes by the hyphenated first name of “Paul-Andrew” vice the first name of “Paul” and a middle name of “Andrew.” The applicant also states that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091607C070212

    Original file (2003091607C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence confirms that the applicant had more than 4 years of active enlisted and warrant officer service when he was ordered to active duty as United States Army Reserve officer and as such, at the time of his separation he would have been serving in the recognized pay grade of 0-2E. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008112

    Original file (20070008112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070008112 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his total service for pay as 17 years, 6 months, and 2 days. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served for more than 4 years as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002326

    Original file (20150002326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DFAS Summary of Retired Pay Account, dated 23 December 1996, wherein it shows: * his retired rank as CPT * his service for basic pay was 20 years, 1 month, and 26 days * the active duty pay rate for a CPT with 20 years of service effective 1 January 1996 was $3,600.00 * the percent multiple for 20.08 years was 50.20 percent (%) * his retired pay was calculated at $3,600.60 X .5020 and equaled $1,807 * the cost of living adjustment was $45 for a gross monthly pay of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054828C070420

    Original file (2001054828C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that his retired pay grade is 0-3E instead of 0-3. Based on the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show his retired pay grade as 0-3E, not 0-3. Correction of the DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 5 May 1992, to show the applicant completed over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member in item 29 (Basic Pay); and

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016927

    Original file (20080016927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was advanced to the pay grade of O-3 on the Retired List but should have been advanced to the pay grade of O-3E based on his prior enlisted and warrant officer service. This service may consist of combined active service and service in the USAR Control Group (Retired), and the Army Grade Determination Board is the agency that reviews the records and/or applications for advancement on the Retired List in behalf of the Secretary for those who have attained 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085741C070212

    Original file (2003085741C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS officials have requested that the Board change its original recommendation to indicate that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in the rank of CPTE , effective 1 March 2001, and that he be provided retired pay based on the formula most favorable to him based on his satisfactory active duty service in both pay grades 0-3E and W-3, to include any back pay due as a result. The Board believed at the time that all the evidence of record confirmation contained in its Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075585C070403

    Original file (2002075585C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As supporting evidence he provides a Personnel Action, DA Form 4187, showing he was promoted to Specialist, E-4 effective 1 February 1994; an email dated 11 April 2000 showing he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List in the grade of Sergeant; and a copy of his retired identification card showing his rank as Sergeant, E-5. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The email message information stating he was placed on the disability retired list as a Sergeant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096501C070212

    Original file (03096501C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his SSAN (social security account number) on his November 1975 National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard of Maryland) and on his August 1980 Department of Defense Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected and that his date of birth on the August 1980 separation document also be correct. By July 1996 the applicant’s diagnosis of schizophrenia was determined to rendered...