Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014203C070206
Original file (20050014203C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 July 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050014203


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Maria C. Sanchez              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James E. Vick                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Barbara J. Ellis              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Donald L. Lewy                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the United States (US)
Army Human Resources Command, memorandum, dated 30 March 2005, to show she
was promoted to Chief Warrant Officer Three, effective 3 April 2004.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that it is unjust that the effective
date of rank on the above memorandum is almost a year later than her
promotion eligibility date. She continues that in accordance with
applicable regulations, promotion and pay are effective the date the
officer has the qualifying time in grade or the date of the promotion
memorandum, whichever is later.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of U.S. Army Human Resources Command,
memorandum, dated 30 March 2005, in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served as an enlisted member of the Army during the
period 8 October 1985 through 6 September 1989.  Afterwards, she was
commissioned as a warrant officer one in the Army National Guard and later
transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR).  On 24 May 2005, she
was honorably retired from the USAR.

2.  The applicant was considered by the Fiscal Year 2003 Chief Warrant
Officer Three and Chief Warrant Officer Four Mandatory Board for promotion.
 This board convened on 21 April 2003 and the list was approved on 8 August
2003.  The board selected the applicant for promotion to the rank of Chief
Warrant Officer Three.

3.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command memorandum, dated 30 March 2005,
notified the applicant that she was selected for promotion to the rank of
Chief Warrant Officer Three in the USAR.  The letter informed the applicant
of the following:  "Your promotion and pay allowances are effective on the
date of this memorandum or the date shown after A above, whichever is
later."  The date after "A" is 3 April 2004.

4.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was
obtained from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri,
dated 24 April 2006.  The Chief, Special Actions Branch of Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components indicated that the applicant was promoted to
Chief Warrant Officer Two on 3 April 1998 and her promotion eligibility
date to Chief Warrant Officer Three was 3 April 2004.
5.  The Chief, Special Actions Branch indicated that the applicant was
transferred to a unit on 9 December 2003 which was notified by a
memorandum, dated 5 February 2004, that she was selected for promotion.
The Chief, Special Actions Branch continued that the applicant's unit
suspended her promotion because she did not meet weight standards and she
had an outdated Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT).

6.  Further, the Chief, Special Actions Branch states that the Office of
Promotions took over the promoting of officers in units around the
February/March timeframe. On 11 March 2005, the applicant’s unit contacted
this office regarding the applicant's eligibility for promotion.  The
Office of Promotions was advised that as of 20 January 2005, the applicant
had passed her APFT and met weight standards.

7.  The Chief, Special Actions Branch opined that if this branch had been
advised at the time the applicant met all promotion requirements, a
promotion memorandum could have been issued earlier; therefore, recommends
that the effective date for promotion be changed to show 20 January 2005.

8.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant
Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 4-21, states, in pertinent
part, the effective date of promotion may not precede the date of the
promotion memorandum.  An officer is promoted after selection if all
qualifications for promotion are met.  When an officer does not meet the
qualifications for promotion, the effective date of promotion will not be
earlier than the later date all qualifications are met.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that the date on the U.S. Army Human Resources
Command memorandum regarding her promotion to the rank of Chief Warrant
Officer Three be changed to show an effective date of rank of 3 April 2004
instead of 30 March 2005.

2.  Evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion to the rank of
Chief Warrant Officer Three on 21 April 2003 and the list was approved on 8
August 2003.  However, the applicant’s promotion was suspended because she
did not meet the Army weight standards and she did not have an up-to-date
APFT which were requirements to receive the promotion.

3.  Regulations state that when an officer does not meet the qualifications
for promotion, the effective date of promotion will not be earlier than the
later date all qualifications are met.

4.  Contrary to the applicant's contention that she is entitled to
promotion effective 3 April 2004, evidence shows she did not meet the
qualifications for promotion to the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Three
until 20 January 2005.

5.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her records to show her
effective promotion date to the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Three is
20 January 2005.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

_BJE____  _DLL____  _JEV___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by showing the individuals effective date of
promotion to the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Three as 20 January 2005.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
changing the individual’s effective date of promotion to 3 April 2004.




                                     __James E. Vick____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050014203                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060719                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT PARTIAL                           |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.  310  |131.0000.0000                           |
|2.  314                 |131.0400.0000                           |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |

-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004373C070206

    Original file (20050004373C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a MFR, dated 27 September 2004, the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch, Army Human Resources Command – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that the applicant could not be promoted on her PED of 20 June 2003, because all promotion qualifications were not met. Army Regulation 135-155, also specifies that an officer's records will be screened to determine eligibility for promotion to first lieutenant far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date promotion service is completed. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016118C070206

    Original file (20050016118C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Memorandum of Record states the applicant's effective date of promotion to 1LT was 2 October 2004 when the APFT and MAW promotion qualifications were met IAW Army Regulation 135- 155, paragraph 4-8. The applicant completed the AMEDD Officer Basic Course (Reserve Component) on 13 June 2003 and her DA Form 1059 indicates she met the height and weight standard at that time. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004549C070206

    Original file (20050004549C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum, dated 21 February 2003, the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch, HRC, advised the 81st RSC, and the applicant, that she was not in a promotable status due to the following disqualifications found in the database: she did not have a current qualifying Physical Examination (less than 5 years old), she did not possess a valid security clearance, and she was not assigned to a valid position. A Promotion Memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, was issued to the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005994C070206

    Original file (20050005994C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his mobilization orders, his troop program unit (TPU) to TPU transfer orders, his notification of promotion to major, and his promotion memorandum for major. Promotion action could not be completed due to the following disqualifications: he must pass an APFT within 12 months of the date of promotion, he must meet height/weight standards as prescribed by Army Regulation 600-9 within 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002120C070206

    Original file (20050002120C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In an advisory opinion, dated 13 July 2005, the Chief, Promotions Branch, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) – St. Louis, Missouri, stated that based on the applicant's corrected date of rank for first lieutenant of 23 February 2000, her promotion eligibility date (PED) for captain was 22 February 2005. No captain AMEDD selection board prior to the 2004 board considered first lieutenants for promotion to captain with a date of rank later than 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004956C070205

    Original file (20060004956C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his date of rank for captain from 17 December 2003 to 26 April 2003, the date he completed his physical examination. He was issued a promotion memorandum, dated 6 October 2004, indicating his promotion to captain with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 17 December 2003. However, because he was not assigned to a captain's position until 17 December 2003, he was not eligible for an earlier promotion effective date and date of rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001421C070205

    Original file (20060001421C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was notified of her eligibility for promotion to 1LT in February 2003, and she completed the required Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) in June 2003, and as a result she met the promotion requirements at that time. This official confirms the effective date of the applicant's appointment into the USAR was 7 March 2002, which made her Promotion Eligibility Date (PED) to 1LT 6 March 2004. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant did not meet...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002347C070206

    Original file (20050002347C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 135-155, paragraph 4-18(2) further specifies that an officer unqualified for promotion for failure to pass the APFT or failure to take and pass the APFT within the period required by Army Regulation 350- 41, will have a date of rank and promotion effective date of the date the officer passes the APFT. The evidence of record shows the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002582

    Original file (20120002582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record includes a Personnel Qualification Record (Officer), dated 14 August 2007, showing his promotion eligibility date as 9 November 2003. His self-authored statement follows: After notification of selection in [April] 2002, I requested that my unit (the 8th Medical Brigade) submit the documentation to award my promotion. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to COL/O-6 in 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...