Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013753C070206
Original file (20050013753C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 July 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050013753


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Dean L. Turnbull              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James E. Vick                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Barbara J. Ellis              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Donald L. Lewy                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3
and his Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed to codes which
would allow him to reenlist.

2.  The applicant states that upon receiving his discharge, he was assigned
an RE code of RE 3 and an SPD code of JFW.  He also stated that if his RE-3
code was changed, he would like to serve his country by enlisting into the
U.S. Navy or U.S. Coast Guard.

3.  The applicant provides:

      a.  his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active
Duty);

      b.  a letter from his Doctor with attachment, dated 2 May 2005.  The
Doctor confirmed that the applicant does have a medical condition in his
left ear, due to a left ventilating tube that the applicant had inserted in
his ear at age 18; and

      c.  a DA Form 4707 (Enlistment Physical Standards Board Proceeding
(EPSBD), dated 15 January 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show that he entered active duty on  
9 October 2003.  He was unable to complete basic combat training due to
medical complications.

2.  On 15 January 2004, the EPSBD found that the applicant had a medical
history of recurrent bilateral otitis media with resultant hearing loss.
Based on those findings the EPSBD determined that the applicant was
medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness
standards, and his medical condition had existed prior to his enlistment.
The applicant concurred with these findings and requested to be discharged
from the Army without delay.

3.  On 9 February 2004, the applicant was discharged under the provision of
paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted
Personnel), due to failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards.
He completed 4 months and 1 day of active service that was uncharacterized.



4.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records)
prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records
by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation
provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the
presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of
proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

5.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment
Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for
enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the US Army Reserve.
Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service
applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE
codes, including Regular Army RE codes.

6.  Table 3-1 (U.S. Army reentry eligibility codes) of Army Regulation  
601-210 states that RE-3 code applies to persons who are not considered
fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation,
but disqualification is waivable.  Soldiers discharged for medical
conditions which existed prior to service are assigned an RE code of RE-3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his RE-3 code should be changed so that he
can enlist into the U.S. Navy or U.S. Coast Guard.

2.  The applicant was determined to have a medical condition which was
disqualifying for enlistment.  He concurred with that finding and requested
discharge.  If the applicant believed that finding was in error, he should
not have concurred with his EPSBD.

3.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for benefits.

4.  The statement from the applicant's Doctor does not establish that the  
RE-3 code the applicant was assigned was improper.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must,
or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or
unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy
that requirement.


6.  The applicant is advised that although his RE-3 code was properly
assigned, this does not mean that he is totally disqualified from returning
to military service. The disqualification upon which the RE-3 code was
based may be waived for enlistment purposes.  The applicant is advised that
if he desires to enlist, he should contact a local recruiter who can best
advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  The
military recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs
of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the
applicant’s RE-3 code.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jev___  ___bje___  ___dll___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the
existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ________James E. Vick___________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2005001753                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2006/07/19                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023860

    Original file (20110023860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The EPSBD recommended his separation from military service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010136

    Original file (20100010136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2008, the applicant concurred with the EPSBD Proceedings in Item 21 (Action by Service Member) of the DA Form 4707 and requested to be discharged from the Army without delay. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the proceedings because his condition was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088497C070403

    Original file (2003088497C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: Such conditions must be discovered during the first six months of active duty, and such findings will result in an EPSBD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003514

    Original file (20140003514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry eligibility (RE) code as 1. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by the appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry in the military service had it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510724C070209

    Original file (9510724C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from AD, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. They are required to process a request for waiver under chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001909C070206

    Original file (20050001909C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was diagnosed with bronchitis and given some medication. The applicant's service medical records are not available. The evidence (the EPSBD proceedings) she provided does not state she completed a methacoline challenge test.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029488

    Original file (20100029488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his examination physicians found no substantial evidence to support an asthma diagnosis. The EPSBD determined that the applicant did not meet medical fitness standards for enlistment based on the applicant's history of asthma. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017740

    Original file (20110017740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110017740 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The EPSBD recommended that the applicant be separated from the military due to his diagnosed medical condition. This portion of the EPSBD Proceedings also provided the applicant the opportunity to concur with the proceedings and request retention on active duty; to disagree with the proceedings because his condition did not exist prior to service; or to disagree with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088131C070403

    Original file (2003088131C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander recommended that the applicant be separated based on the EPSBD results in Item 25 (Action by Unit Commander) of the DA Form 4707. The statement from the 94th RSC sergeant confirms that the applicant was processed for enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in 1996, but was denied due to medical reasons. The evidence further confirms that although he had the option to disagree with the EPSBD findings and recommendations and/or to request retention on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076002C070215

    Original file (2002076002C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.