Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011689C070206
Original file (20050011689C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        18 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050011689


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Yvonne Foskey                 |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests in effect, removal of Headquarters, United
States Army Medical Department Center & School and Fort Sam Houston, Texas
General Court-Martial Orders Number (#) 3, dated 27 March 2002, from his
Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he continues to be punished by having
the GCM order on file in his OMPF.  Further, the GCM order being on file in
his OMPF adversely impacts his opportunity for promotion.

3.  The applicant provides the following in support of his application:
Commander Memorandum of Support; Command Sergeant Major (CSM) Memorandum of
Support; Army Legal Services Agency Letter, dated
18 April 2002; Headquarters, United States Army Medical Department Center &
School and Fort Sam Houston GCM Orders #3, dated 27 March 2002;
Four Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOERs); Enlistment
Document (DD Form 4/1); Statements for Enlistment (DA Form 3286-E); and
Request for Reenlistment or Extension (DA Form 3340-R).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s record shows he is currently serving on active duty, in
      the
rank of staff sergeant (SSG), and is serving as a member of Task Force Med
115, Abu Ghraib, Iraq.

2.  The applicant’s record contains a copy of Headquarters, United States
Army Medical Department Center & School and Fort Sam Houston, GCM Orders #
3 , dated 27 March 2002.  These orders confirm the applicant was found
guilty of two specifications of violating Article 92 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (UCMJ) by wrongfully having an inappropriate relationship
with two Soldiers of a different rank (trainees).

3.  The applicant provides memoranda of support from his commander and CSM
in Iraq.  Both command officials give the applicant their highest
recommendation and support his request to remove the GCM order from his
OMPF, or moved from the performance portion (P-Fiche) to the restricted
portion (R-Fiche) of the applicant’s OMPF.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management
/Records) prescribes the policies and mandates operating tasks for the
Military Personnel (MILPER) Information Management/Records Program of the
Military Personnel System.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the OMPF.  Table
2-1 outlines the composition of the OMPF.  It states, in pertinent part,
that
Court-martial orders will be filed in the P-Fiche of the OMPF when there is
an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification.  There are no
provisions for transferring court-martial orders to the R-Fiche portion of
the OMPF.

5.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) sets forth policies
and procedures on the authorization for placement of unfavorable
information about Army members in individual official personnel files.  It
also contains the policy for appealing/petitioning for removal from or
transfer of documents in the OMPF.  It provides provisions for
removing/transferring letters of reprimand, admonition, censure, and
Article 15s.  However, there are no provisions provided for the removal or
transfer of a court-martial order.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to remove the GCM orders in question from his
OMPF, or to transfer these orders from the P-Fiche to the R-Fiche of his
OMPF, and the supporting documents he submitted were carefully considered.
However, regulations governing the composition of the OMPF and the
removal or transfer of unfavorable information provide no provisions that
allow removal of court-martial orders from the OMPF, or their transfer to
the R-Fiche.

2.  The supporting statements from the applicant’s commander and CSM are
noteworthy and were also carefully considered.  However, the evidence of
record confirms the applicant’s court-martial was accomplished within the
governing laws and regulation and his rights were fully protected
throughout the process.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary
basis to support removal or transfer of this properly filed document from
the OMPF.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JNS__  ___LDS_  ___KWL_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____John N. Slone______
                                            CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050011689                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005-10-18                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |N/A                                     |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |Active Duty                             |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |N/A                                     |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |N/A                                     |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |126.0400.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007674C070206

    Original file (20050007674C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Headquarters, United States Army Communications Electronics Command and Fort Monmouth, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey General Court-Martial (GCM) Orders Number (#) 1, dated 22 November 2002 be removed from, or transferred to the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant’s request to remove the GCM orders in question from his OMPF, or to transfer them to the R-Fiche of his OMPF, and the supporting documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013467

    Original file (20070013467.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a self-authored letter, dated 15 September 2007; a copy of General Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 5 January 2001; and two letters of recommendation from his battalion commander and battalion command sergeant major (CSM), in support of his application. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that General Court-Martial Orders are filed on the P fiche when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010271C070205

    Original file (20060010271C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-37, also provides that a LOR or MOR, regardless of issuing authority, may be filed in the OMPF only upon the order of a general officer. In April 2006, based on a request by the applicant for removal of the MOR from his OMPF or transfer of the OMPF to his R-fiche, the DASEB concluded that the MOR had served its intended purpose and it would be in the best interest of the Army to transfer the document to the R-fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010350C070206

    Original file (20050010350C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests in effect, removal or placement into his restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) of Headquarters, United States Army Communications Electronics Command and Fort Monmouth, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey General Court-Martial Orders Number (#) 1, dated 22 November 2002. The applicant’s request to remove the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010780C070208

    Original file (20040010780C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that a summary court-martial (SCM) Order be transferred from the performance (P-Fiche) to the restricted (R- Fiche) portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There are no provisions for transferring court-martial orders to the R-Fiche portion of the OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087017C070212

    Original file (2003087017C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 May 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087017 The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request that a GCM order filed on the R-Fiche of his OMPF that contains a not guilty finding be removed from his record because it continues to show up on his P-Fiche.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014443C070206

    Original file (20050014443C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) be removed from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). However, the evidence of record confirms that the disposition and filing of the record of NJP he accepted on 25 August 1994, while he was serving in the rank of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011754C070206

    Original file (20050011754C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, because the promotion boards can see his restricted fiche, the GOMOR has prevented him from being selected for promotion to the pay grade of E-7. Army Regulation 600-8-19, Enlisted Promotions and Reductions, serves as the authority for the conduct of selection boards. Promotion boards for selection to the pay grades of E-7 and E-8 are not routinely provided information from the restricted fiche of eligible Soldiers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060691C070421

    Original file (2001060691C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 5 September 1997, and all other documents pertaining to the GOMOR be transferred from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) to his restricted fiche (R-Fiche). DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011732C070206

    Original file (20050011732C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This supervisor supports transferring the GCM order in question to the R-Fiche of the applicant’s OMPF to allow for the applicant’s advancement in the Army. The GCM order in question is filed in the P-Fiche of his OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulation.