RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 November 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050009741
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Eric N. Andersen | |Member |
| |Mr. Joe R. Schroeder | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
rated disability for impaired hearing be approved for Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states that he was not given hearing protection during
field artillery exercises or during combat firing while in Germany and in
Vietnam. He was treated for ringing in his ears by a field medic, but the
ringing would return during the next firing session.
3. The applicant provides the partial denial of his request for CRSC.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, provides for the payment
of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for
combat related disabilities if it wasn’t for the statutory prohibition for
a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension. Payment is made by
the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free. Eligible members are
those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or
20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at age 60) and who
have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially
hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by
an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA
and rated at least 10% disabling. For periods before 1 January 2004 (the
date this statute was amended), members had to have disabilities for which
they have been awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled
or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war,
or caused by an instrumentality of war. Military retirees who are approved
for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since
CRSC consists of the Military Department returned a portion of the waived
retired pay to the military retiree.
2. On 10 March 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s
request for CRSC.
3. In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.
2. The applicant has not stated that a particular injury caused his
impaired hearing. He believes that prolonged exposure to artillery and
small arms fire caused his impaired hearing. However, impaired hearing can
be caused by a number of things. As such, his belief that his impaired
hearing was caused by weapons fire is speculative at best.
3. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the
applicant’s impaired hearing to war or the simulation of war, there is
insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jrs___ ___ena__ ____tap__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_________Thomas A. Pagan__________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050009741 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20051122 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003557C070206
Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hearing impairment be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). On 11 February 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s request for CRSC for impaired hearing.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004885C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for impaired hearing be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s impaired hearing to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003955C070206
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for impaired hearing (100 percent) and tinnitus (10 percent) be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, excerpts from his military records, and VA rating decisions. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s hearing loss and tinnitus to war or the simulation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001982C070205
Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013338
There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided evidence which shows that he sustained a VA Rated disability as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006010C070205
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for impaired hearing and tinnitus be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). By the time he returned from Vietnam his hearing had deteriorated to the point where he had to be issued hearing aids. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001445C070205
Gerald J. Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, military medical records showing that he was given physical profile limitations because of hearing loss, and VA rating decisions. Tinnitus is the medical term for "hearing" noises in your ears when there is no outside source of the sounds.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003507C070206
Leonard G. Hassell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 20 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s loss of motion of two fingers and traumatic arthritis were not combat related and denied his request for CRSC. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007804C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, the applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hearing loss and tinnitus be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD advisory opinions indicate that CRSC is generally intended for military retirees who can show that their disabilities were caused by a specific incident which has been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003554C070206
robe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that the VA made a correction to his disability rating. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.