Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007467C070206
Original file (20050007467C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         10 January 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050007467


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Yvonne Foskey                 |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Kenneth L. Wright             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Dale E. DeBruler              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Qawly A. Sabree               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was never issued award of the PH
for the injury he received to his right shoulder while serving in the
Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in April 1969.

3.  The applicant provides a medical treatment record in support of his
application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 31 March 1970.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
12 April 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s records show he was inducted into the Army and entered
active duty on 1 April 1968.  He was trained in, awarded and served in
military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

4.  The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows he
served in the RVN from 29 August 1968 through 25 August 1969.

5.  On 31 March 1970, the applicant was honorably separated after
completing a total of 2 years of active military service.  The DD Form 214
he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards:  National
Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 3 bronze service
stars; Vietnam Campaign Medal; Combat Infantryman Badge; Sharpshooter
Qualification Badge with
Rifle Bar; Marksman Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and 1st Class
Gunner Badge.
6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board staff
reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  This
search revealed an entry on the applicant that confirms he was wounded in
action in the RVN on
13 April 1969.

7.  The applicant provides a medical treatment record that shows that on 14
April 1969, he was treated for a right shoulder injury he sustained from a
grenade fragment.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and
criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the
regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH.  It states, in pertinent

part that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed
in action.  A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an
outside force or agent sustained under conditions defined by this
regulation.  In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary
to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required
treatment by a medical officer.  This treatment must be supported by
records of medical treatment for the wound or injury received in action,
and must have been made a matter of official record.

9.  Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated in 1974,
authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm
Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to the RVN from 8 February 1962
through 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to the PH was carefully considered
and found to have merit.  By regulation, in order to support award of the
PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was
treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a
matter of official record.

2.  The evidence of record includes the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam
Casualty Roster entry confirming the applicant was wounded in action in the
RVN on 13 April 1969.  Further, the medical treatment record provided by
the applicant confirms he was treated for this combat related wound.
Therefore, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the
PH has been satisfied in this case, and it would be appropriate to award
him the PH at this time.

3.  The record also confirms that based on his RVN service, he is entitled
to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Thus, it would also be
appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___KLW_  __DED __  __QAS__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple
Heart for being wounded in action in the RVN on 13 April 1969; by showing
he is entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit
Citation; and by providing him a correction to his separation document that
includes these awards.




                            ____Kenneth L. Wright ____
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050007467                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2006/01/10                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD,                                     |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1970/03/31                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR635-200 . . . . .                     |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |ETS                                     |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |107                                     |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009497C080407

    Original file (20070009497C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Clinical Record (SF 502); Physical Profile Record (DA Form 8- 274); and Separation Document (DD Form 214). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089062C070403

    Original file (2003089062C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, confirmation that the applicant was wounded in action and treated for this wound is provided by an entry on the official DA Vietnam Casualty Roster. Therefore, the Board finds the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support the award of the PH has been satisfied in this case, and it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH and to add this award to his record at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004920C070208

    Original file (20040004920C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Antonio Uribe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) confirms that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 5 December 1969 through 27 August 1970. Notwithstanding the entry in Item 40 his DA Form 20, there are no orders or documents on file in his MPRJ that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067839C070402

    Original file (2002067839C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical officer. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for being wounded in action, while serving as a SGT/E-5 in the RVN, on 18 February 1970;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088882C070403

    Original file (2003088882C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty in the Army on 8 May 1967. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The Board considered the applicant’s claim that Iwo Jima took place before he was born and that he never saw a skylight while he was serving in the RVN, which proves that were errors in the medical treatment record and as a result he should receive the PH.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087327C070212

    Original file (2003087327C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH at this time. Lacking any derogatory information on file and/or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, which would preclude him from receiving the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant served a qualifying period of service that entitles him to receive the first award of the AGCM. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000878C070205

    Original file (20060000878C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. In this case, while it is clear the applicant was medically evacuated from the RVN, there is no evidence of record that indicates this was the result of his being wounded in action. Further, the CIB is not listed with the authorized awards listed on his DA Form 20 and DD Form 214, and there are no orders on file...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050014177

    Original file (20050014177.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received a combat related injury during a combat operation in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 17 March 1969, which he believes entitles him to a second award of the PH. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087100C070212

    Original file (2003087100C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for the PH. The evidence of record provides no confirmation that the applicant was ever wounded in action or that he was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077141C070215

    Original file (2002077141C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the PH for wounds he received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded or recommended for the CIB.