Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007260C070206
Original file (20050007260C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           1 December 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050007260


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Maribeth Love                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Richard G. Sayre              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH and he needs his
military records to reflect this award.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214)
in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 1 October 1953.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
26 April 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed
that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This
case is being considered using the applicant’s DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army and
entered active duty on 25 January 1952.  It further shows that he served on
active duty for 1 year, 8 months, and 7 days until being honorably
separated on
1 October 1953.

5.  The applicant’s separation document also confirms he served overseas
for
1 year, 1 month, and 12 days, and that he earned the following awards:
Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Korean Service Medal (KSM) with 2 bronze
service stars, United Nations Service Medal, and National Defense Service
Medal.  The PH is not included in the list of authorized awards contained
on the DD Form 214.
6.  Item 29 (Wounds Received as a Result of Action with Enemy Forces) of
the applicant’s DD Form 214 contains the entry “None”.

7.  During the review of this case, a member of the Board staff reviewed
the Korean War Casualty Roster.  The applicant’s name was not included in
this Department of the Army (DA) list of Korean War Casualties.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy,
criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military
awards.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to
awarding the PH.  It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to
any member of an Armed Force who is wounded or killed in action.  A wound
is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or
agent sustained under conditions defined by this regulation.  In order to
support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the
wound, for which the award is being made, required treatment by a medical
officer.  This treatment must be supported by records of medical treatment
for the wound or injury received in action, and must have been made a
matter of official record.

9.  On 20 August 1999, the Department of Defense approved acceptance and
wear of the Korean War Service Medal (KWSM) to eligible veterans of the
Korean War.  Responsibility for distribution of the KWSM was given to the
Department of the Air Force.  An application should be submitted, with a
copy of a DD Form 214, to the Awards and Decorations Section, Headquarters,
Air Force Personnel Center, 550 C Street West, Suite 12, Randolph Air Force
Base, Texas 78150-4714.  Once the KWSM has been authorized by the
Department of the Air Force, application may be made to this Board to add
this award to his DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim of entitlement to the PH was carefully
considered.  However, by regulation, in order to award a PH, it is
necessary to establish that a member was wounded in action, that the wound
required treatment by a medical officer and this treatment must have been
made a matter of official record.

2.  The available evidence includes a DD Form 214 that contains an entry
showing the applicant was never wounded in action.  Further, the PH is not
included in the list of authorized awards contained on this separation
document; and his name is not included in the Korean War Casualty Roster,
the official
DA list of Korea battle casualties.  Therefore, the regulatory burden of
proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this
case.
3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 1 October 1953, the date of his
separation from active duty.  Therefore, the time for him to file a request
for correction of any error or injustice expired on 30 September 1956.
However, he failed to file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has
not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be
in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JTM _  ___ML __  ___RGS _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            ____John T. Meixell_______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050007260                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/12/01                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1953/10/01                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 615-363                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.  61   |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008032C070208

    Original file (20040008032C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The available evidence in this case includes OTSG hospital admission record information contained in a NARA report that confirms the applicant was wounded in action and treated for his wounds while serving in Korea. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was wounded in action in Korea, and to award him the PH.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009898

    Original file (20060009898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009898 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. However, absent any evidence (medical treatment records, eyewitness statements, or record entries) that show his injuries were the result of enemy action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007800C070206

    Original file (20050007800C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA documentation confirms the applicant was granted service connection and a disability rating for a knee injury he received while serving on active duty. While the applicant’s current medical conditions, as documented in the VA file, are unfortunate, absent any evidence of record to corroborate his claim that he was wounded as a result of enemy action, or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel, the regulatory burden of proof...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002722C070206

    Original file (20050002722C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who is wounded or killed in action. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was wounded in action in Korea, and to award him the PH.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007737C070206

    Original file (20050007737C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The evidence of record includes an OTSG Hospital Admission Record that confirms the applicant was admitted to a medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007444C070206

    Original file (20050007444C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, the PH should be included in the list of awards entered on his separation document (DD Form 214). It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who is wounded or killed in action. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by showing his entitlement to the National Defense Service Medal; and by providing him a correction to his separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083042C070215

    Original file (2002083042C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for a wound suffered on 30 November 1950 during the Korean War. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. Based on the documentation provided by the applicant and the information contained on the Korean...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015757C070206

    Original file (20050015757C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no indication that these wounds were received as a result of enemy action, and the military medical records used for this determination were not included with the application. The evidence does show that based on his service in Korea, he is entitled to KWSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Korean War Service Medal; and by providing him a correction to his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012699

    Original file (20050012699.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050012699 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The PH is not included in the list of authorized awards contained on the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012102C071029

    Original file (20060012102C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Notwithstanding the entries in Item 29 of the applicant's 25 July 1952 separation document, the letters responding to the applicant's PH inquiries in 1952 and 1953 verify that the applicant's entitlement to the PH could not be established by TAG or his unit at that time, when all relevant documents, orders, and medical treatment records should still have been available. Therefore, the Board requests that...